But your account may also be valid its just the other side of the story, it however does relate to my assertion about resistance to change in India in the other thread where I wanted to contribute and asked if you'd be able to prevent it turning into a heap of garbage which attracts every sort of critter, anyways.
I recognised your account immediately on reading; it is that purveyed by those Sikhs abroad who feel dispossessed in the Punjab, for reasons that no one can quite understand.
Let me first recite the facts.
There was, in independent India, a great deal of territory to be rearranged and formed into administrative blocs. This was done by taking the old hill states and forming them into Himachal Pradesh. The remainder stayed Punjab. But that was not good enough, and the Akalis wanted a state where the Sikh was in the majority; it was not even a situation where they might have felt threatened, as they were already prominent in every single walk of life, without exception. So again, administrative arrangements were made, and they were appeased by the carving out of the state of Haryana, gerrymandered to provide the Sikhs their Sikh majority state.
In this state, in which I served for a number of years, the Hindus who were part of the state were always on the defensive, always aware that it was the land of the Jat Sikh, and their party, the Akali Dal, and that in their own country, they were treated as second class citizens. They started locking themselves into their identity by speaking Hindi, that had never had any ground in any of these states; it was now a question of retaining cultural identity.
Where and how they convinced themselves that the tide was against them is difficult to say. Their culture and their religion were dominant, their vehicle was the party that ruled the state, their gurdwaras had been rescued from the Mahants a generation ago. Right through the entire period from 1947 on till 1984, there was nothing to hold back the Sikh.
The trouble that was caused that they may have referred to, apparently, was the time of troubles in the Punjab. I wonder if they mentioned that this was that period to you in their conversations.
(to be cont.)