What's new

Why India Occupied Siachen?

Really ? Who were the 20 poor souls that were buried by avalanche just a month before ?

Yes you are , but what threat do you post to us ? :azn: ... Can you threaten Skardu or KKH ? :no:

you are poor troll..:lol:
that incident dint happen in siachin ..it was some where in kashmir;)
so try hard buddy and they were not 20 ..they were near 12 and we salute them
 
you are poor troll..:lol:
that incident dint happen in siachin ..it was some where in kashmir;)
so try hard buddy and they were not 20 ..they were near 12 and we salute them
How is that trolling ? :what: ...
 
Yar jaagte hua bhi sapne dekhte ho ???

Isn't that what you lot are doing? Dreaming to take Kashmir because it supposedly "belongs" to you (not even in your dreams :lol:).

Kashmir rightfully belongs to Pakistan. You indians have proven to be aggressors when you forcefully took Hyderabad against the will of the leader, but you claim the people had your support and therefore your aggression was justified.

Now when we Pakistanis apply the same rule to Kashmir, you bharatis come up with the false excuse: "oh, but the mahraja wanted accession to india :-)blah:)".


There goes your bharati hypocrisy.
 
Isn't that what you lot are doing? Dreaming to take Kashmir because it supposedly "belongs" to you (not even in your dreams :lol:).

Take? lol what do we have to 'take'?

We have your 'Sheh Rag' already and we've sucessfully managed to sweep it under the rug.

We control the river, the heights etc. :lol:
 
If it didn't happen in Siachen and you try to portray it as a loss suffered because of Siachen, then that IS trolling.
Some Indian member mentioned it in the main Avalanche accident thread ... I didn't know though ...
 
Take? lol what do we have to 'take'?

We have your 'Sheh Rag' already and we've sucessfully managed to sweep it under the rug.

We control the river, the heights etc. :lol:

Oh so now you decided to troll aye?

You think cutting out most of my post and quoting me out of context to make your retarded argument look valid is a justifiable thing to do? It only makes you look like a desperate fool trying to grab on to any straws to prove your point, which you didn't since your post is nothing but a egotistic rant.

Well guess what, i will post this in response to your egotistic rant.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWwBbBhHV0w

and we can continue on like this if this is what you call a valid way of debating?
 
As a part of J&K it has historically belonged to us. What's there to occupy in it?

Historically? It belonged to Kashmiris, and most of the Kashmiris have "historically" been mostly Muslims. That's one thing.

The other thing: The Muslims of Kashmir (especcially those of the Kashmir valley) have had a shared culture with that of the Punjabis (Muslims) and most Muslim Punjabis are part of Pakistan today.

Thirdly: Kashmir belongs to you lot as much as Hyderabad, Junagadh and Manavadar belongs to us. Which is none.

Don't forget you're the ones that attacked these 3 states, removed the kings from power and annexed the states into your Union. If you cared about the people's wishes so much, might as well hold a referendum in Kashmir and see which side they'll wish to join

But no, India won't do that; it knows Kashmir doesn't belong to them, and neither did it in the past.
 
I never wanted to go this way..

Nehru’s statement in Lok Sabha on March 5, 1963 which said that “Pakistan’s line of actual control reached the Karakoram pass" In other words what Pakistan believes is correct - straight line in a northeasterly direction from NJ 9842 up to the Karakoram pass on its boundary with China

Now tell me who violated accords? Pakistan?

As per Nehru statement that galcier belongs to us, as we think it is ours.

That is a loosely worded statement.

What is more relevant is the agreement Pakistan signed in 1972.
 
This thread with no disrespect meant to the starter is a perfect example of completely avoidable posting.

This subject has been discussed to the bone so many times with both sides convinced that they have done right..& so shall the attitudes remain.

Precious lives have been lost & we squabble over a piece of land close to 99.9 % people here have never seen or would build up the courage to visit.
 
Its funny, Indians have J&K and Siachin to themselves but they won't feed their poor with clean fresh water...
Whats the point when Indians are proven to be natural misers?
 
Its funny, Indians have J&K and Siachin to themselves but they won't feed their poor with clean fresh water...
Whats the point when Indians are proven to be natural misers?

What has Siachen & J&K do with clean water ?

Proven ? Can you share the proof of the claim above ?
 
What has Siachen & J&K do with clean water ?

Proven ? Can you share the proof of the claim above ?

No need to argue. Go and study Geography of the state and history behind Kashmir issue shah bash go now... :lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom