What's new

what will be pakistan's answer to rafale

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can J-10c compete with rafale?

and what about the typhoon, how good are they and what's the probability of us getting them?
 
Last edited:
.
there's another option..... PAF better buy some more used F-16s in cheap price while inducting Jf and save some cash and induct Chinese stealth fighter i hear next year or in 2018 they're going to be mass produced... i don't know if the stealth fighter is banned fro exports,,,.. but if not or if pakistan can procure them then better add few stealth.... that'll be a better counter again Rafale

Just few commandos will do the job and they wont be able to see the sky line ever again

Stop kidding yourself man... do read what happened the last time when PAF airdropped your commandos into an IAF airbase.. our foot soilders chased them away while few of the SSG's were caught
 
.
The closest asset would be J-10C in terms of performance, electronics, deployment, and role.
 
.
Stop kidding yourself man... do read what happened the last time when PAF airdropped your commandos into an IAF airbase.. our foot soilders chased them away while few of the SSG's were caught

Do you have any proofs of this claims or yours ... ????
 
.
Realistically F-16's newer versions or Su-35 (that too a hardsell), otherwise Chinese J10 etc. is no match for Su-30 let alone Rafales, and J-31 is just wishful thinking .

But really, we should push US hard to sell those juicy F-16's to us, our pilots love them and are expert in flying them .

I don't see why the J-10C cannot give the Rafale a run for its money; the two share similar upgrade schemes in terms of electronics, weapons, airframe changes, and engines.
 
.
Do you have any proofs of this claims or yours ... ????

ofcourse i've proof... and its well known by senior pdf pakistani users... since most of the blunders not published to Pakistani public i'll let you research this one. look up what happened to SSG's ops in 3 Indian airbases in 1965
 
.
ofcourse i've proof... and its well known by senior pdf pakistani users... since most of the blunders not published to Pakistani public i'll let you research this one. look up what happened to SSG's ops in 3 Indian airbases in 1965

lol - hidden from Pakistani public and available to indian public from the propaganda channels and sources which are only Indian ...
 
.
Can J-10c compete with rafale?

and what about the typhoon, how good are they and what's the probability of us getting them?

J-10 c .Good in paper and specs .But when it comes to real time experience Rafale is a mammoth .That fighter already saw actions in Libya and against IS in Iraq and Syria .
Then again.It has western avionics .So except J 31 or J 20 ,there is no rival for Rafale in Asia for now .
EFT of course can be good.But you have to convince 4 nations and a good load of money .

there's another option..... PAF better buy some more used F-16s in cheap price while inducting Jf and save some cash and induct Chinese stealth fighter i hear next year or in 2018 they're going to be mass produced... i don't know if the stealth fighter is banned fro exports,,,.. but if not or if pakistan can procure them then better add few stealth.... that'll be a better counter again Rafale



Stop kidding yourself man... do read what happened the last time when PAF airdropped your commandos into an IAF airbase.. our foot soilders chased them away while few of the SSG's were caught


Chinese banned the exports of their J 20 .But I think J 31 options is in there.
 
.
lol - hidden from Pakistani public and available to indian public from the propaganda channels and sources which are only Indian ...

lol i'll give you a pakistani source... read well



Anyway lets not go off topic... please do not feel the necessity to quote me..

I don't see why the J-10C cannot give the Rafale a run for its money; the two share similar upgrade schemes in terms of electronics, weapons, airframe changes, and engines.

Don't take in a wrong way but i think PAF has big doubts in the capability of J-10.. that's why even though they've better relations with China, they're not going for J-10. i don't know what J-10 gives that f-16 doesn't !!!
 
Last edited:
.
Care to explain..
the mki has a poor servicing and very low availability rates, whilst the rafale isnt, and will have availability rate of at least 80% which is significantly higher than the mki .not to mention the rafale is more advanced.
 
.
We are atomic state and we need not to worry from Rafale. We already have F16 and JF17 and we should plan for J31 only. No need to Panic. Baniya can never attack us. They know we will turn their bharat mata into nuclear wasteland.
Only this atom bomb is enough indeed. I hope these fanatic pakistani's realise that we dont need to worry what every the indians buy we already have something to keep giving them thoughts of not attacking us.
 
.
the mki has a poor servicing and very low availability rates, whilst the rafale isnt, and will have availability rate of at least 80% which is significantly higher than the mki .not to mention the rafale is more advanced.

Sir, MKI's availability rate is being pushed to 75%... by next year this goal will be achieved, current availability rate is around 60-65% and in 2014 it was 55%

Mostly mki's main mission would be for deep penetration an strike while Rafale would be used for SEAD ops befor mki go in
 
.
Sir, MKI's availability rate is being pushed to 75%... by next year this goal will be achieved, current availability rate is around 60-65% and in 2014 it was 55%

Mostly mki's main missile would be for deep penetration an strike while Rafale would be used for SEAD ops befor mki go in
ok..... i thought the service rate was 60% in 2014 but if it's 55% then thats near enough the best part of half of the fleet inactive. why dont they build the parts in house instead of relaying on Russia well if india builds them, then im sure it makes sense to make the parts right?
 
. . .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom