What's new

Vietnamese vs Cantonese: Guangdong-Guangxi alliance vs Vietnam, which one is more powerful?

Status
Not open for further replies.
:lol: you want to compare these few insignificant purchase compare to lenevo bought over of IBM? I am talking about multi billion purchase of MNC not those insignificant low price buy over. Vietnam has no major MNC in global scale. How many vietnam company listed in nasqad like alibaba?

Mayor? What is so significant about those low post mayor? Will it dictate US economy? I am asking for Apple and you used an orange to try challenge me? :lol:

He intentionally forgot to mention that in US, some small towns have little population and little economic activities. If you have money, you can buy the town and become mayor. Clint Eastwood is the mayor of the town he purchased.
 
.
Does a few bad egg means all? So by your theory, all Muslim shall be killed becos of ISIS or al Qaeda?

Most ROC support one China policy and investment continue to pour into China. We are well integrated.

He is right, KMT is a bunch of traitors.

They also invest 'color revolt.' in mainland China with US's support. Love to see Chinese fighting each other for 'democracy'. Just give TW more time and support, they will surely ruin China badly :pop:

But one thing you failed to mention here.

CPC has proven itself that the communist party is far superior to its capitalist counterpart in China, that's why most Chinese people right now are still pro-CPC and anti-KMT.

However, VPC has failed to prove how the communist party in Vietnam is better than the old ROV regime. That's why the color revolution is closer to you than to China.
 
Last edited:
.
He is right, KMT is a bunch of traitors.

PRC should nuke them all.

.
Good, at least we see an honest Chinese here.
But one thing you failed to mention here.

CPC has proven itself that the communist party is far superior to its capitalist counterpart in China, that's why most Chinese people right now are still pro-CPC and anti-KMT.

However, VPC has failed to prove how the communist party in Vietnam is better than the old ROV regime. That's why the color revolution is closer to you than to China
CPC with its terrible corrupted -poorly trained- coward army will lead China to No where. Remember your lastest humiliated lost in oil rig conflict when a huge China ship forces had to withdraw sooner than expect ??

VN is small country, so its very easy to handle all kind of revolt while China is much bigger and facing with much bigger revolt incited by US-TW, so, we can sit and watch who fall into chaos by 'umbrella revolt' faster :pop:
 
. .
Good, at least we see an honest Chinese here.

CPC with its terrible corrupted -poorly trained- coward army will lead China to No where.

VN is small country, so its very easy to handle all kind of revolt while China is much bigger and facing with much bigger revolt incited by US-TW, so, we can sit and watch who fall into chaos by 'umbrella revolt' faster :pop:

This is not true.

CPC right now at least has stopped the privatization, and they are taking back all the money.

The local government debt is going down, and last year, there were more than trillion of booty getting collected from the anti-corruption/graft operation.

Can VCP do the same?

Now the privatization is going rampant in Vietnam, and if you cannot control the ongoing process of the privatization, then your communist government will soon be gone, and a major color revolution conspired by the corrupt officials and the US will come after you.

Before laughing at China, you should look after yourself.
 
Last edited:
.
This is not true.

CPC right now at least has stopped the privatization, and they are taking back all the money.

The local government debt is going down, and last year, there were more than trillion of booty getting collected from the anti-corruption/graft operation.

Can VPC do the same?

Now the privatization is going rampant in Vietnam, and if you cannot control the ongoing process of the privatization, then your communist will be soon gone, and a major color revolution conspired by the corrupt officials and the US will come after you.

Before laughing at China, you should look after yourself.
We need money, so the privatization is inevitable , but the government still hold 51 % in all important joint stock companies, so its still OK.

And No one want a color revolt happen in VN, so the anti-Govt parties dont have any support while 'umbrella revolt' in China got a very strong support from TW-US :pop:
 
.
We need money, so the privatization is inevitable , but the government still hold 51 % in all important joint stock companies, so its still OK.

And No one want a color revolt happen in VN, so the anti-Govt parties dont have any support while 'umbrella revolt' in China got a very strong support from TW-US :pop:

When the privatization is complete, the color revolution will come after VCP.

Since you keep calling yourself a supporter of Marxism, but shame on you for supporting the privatization.

Even Putin right now is not communist in the name, but he is also against the privatization of the state-owned economy.

Being a communist nation, meanwhile to support the privatization, your country will die in a very ugly way.

The USSR had experienced this lesson at the end.
 
Last edited:
.
When the privatization is complete, the color revolution will come after VCP.

Since you keep calling yourself a supporter of Marxism, but shame on you for supporting the privatization.

Even Putin right now is not communist in the name, but he is also against the privatization of the state-owned economy.

Being a communist, meanwhile to support the privatization, your country will die in a very ugly way.

The USSR had experienced this lesson at the end.
Pls, Read the NEP if u wanna understand more abt communism, and bcz NEP is suitable with VN, thats why we support communist .

USSR forgot NEP, thats why its economy reform failed and collapse :pop:
 
.
Pls, Read the NEP if u wanna understand more abt communism, and bcz NEP is suitable with VN, thats why we support communist .

USSR forgot NEP, thats why its economy reform failed and collapse :pop:

Holding 51% of the share is not the true privatization. When some SOE is not functioning properly, so every communist government will sell off some of the share to inject more capital, but the bottom line is to keep 51% of the controlling share. While your government is calling for the full privatization which is to sell off more than 51% of the government share.

Privatization of Vietnam’s Port Infrastructure to Boost Efficiency and Lower Prices - Vietnam Briefing News

BTW, China is always your teacher, since you has chosen China's path of reform, not USSR's.

And USSR won't collapse if they didn't choose the full privatization path as their reform.

China has made many mistakes during its reform, but now we are fixing our mistakes.

If your VCP wanna survive, then you better to learn more from CPC.
 
Last edited:
.
Holding 51% of the share is not the true privatization. When some SOE is not functioning properly, so every communist government will sell off some of the share to inject more capital, but the bottom line is to keep 51% of the controlling share. While your government is calling for the full privatization which is to sell off more than 51% of the government share.

Privatization of Vietnam’s Port Infrastructure to Boost Efficiency and Lower Prices - Vietnam Briefing News
.
Full privatization only happen to some unimportant companies while its still 51% in important companies like oil-electricity .
BTW, China is always your teacher, since you has chosen China's path of reform, not USSR's.

And USSR won't collapse if they didn't choose the full privatization path as their reform.

China has made many mistakes during its reform, but now we are fixing our mistakes.

If your VPC wanna survive, then you better to learn more from CPC
No, we start applying NEP during 80's , we dont bow down, accept US's rule on our island,lands and beg for US-JP support like China in 1979.

If China think he is a teacher, then he is a very bad teacher who only can teach the others how to bow down to US and accept US's rules on TW and now he's facing with 'umbrella revolt' incited by TW-US :pop:
 
.
Full privatization only happen to some unimportant companies while its still 51% in important companies like oil-electricity .

To privatize those profitable non-strategic SOEs will also cause the wealth discrepancy, the rich will get richer and the poor will get poorer.

CPC has made the same mistakes during the 1990s by privatizing those non-strategic small SOEs which still resulted million of workers losing their job.

No, we start applying NEP during 80's , we dont bow down, accept US's rule on our island,lands and beg for US-JP support like China in 1979.

If China think he is a teacher, then he is a very bad teacher who only can teach the others how to bow down to US and accept US's rules on TW and now he's facing with 'umbrella revolt' incited by TW-US :pop:

Nope, we have applied the NEP, while USSR has gone down to the path of the full privatization.

During the 1980s, Vietnam was a stooge of USSR, so you will follow the policy what USSR has implemented.

During the late 1980s, there were two models for you to choose, China's NEP model and USSR's privatization model.

You chose China's model at the end, just admit this fact.
 
Last edited:
. .
To privatize those profit non-strategic SOEs will also cause the wealth discrepancy, the rich will get richer and the poor will get poorer.

CPC has made the same mistakes during the 1990s by privatizing those non-strategic small SOEs which still resulted million of workers losing their job.
It also happen during NEP in USSR, thats why it was stopped. But we have no choice, we need money to buy more weapons to fight with u guys.

We need money now, when we have enough, we may stop Full privatization in non-strategic small SOEs :)
 
.
It also happen during NEP in USSR, thats why it was stopped. But we have no choice, we need money to buy more weapons to fight with u guys.

We need money now, when we have enough, we may stop Full privatization in non-strategic small SOEs :)

Nope, that traitor Gorbachev had chosen to 100% privatize the state-owned economy, which also resulted the collapse of USSR.

China had also privatized those small SOEs, but we have kept those large ones, that's why we have survived, but million of Chinese workers had still lost their job because of our mistakes.

When USA wanna convince you to 100% privatize your strategic SOEs, then what are you going to do with this?
 
Last edited:
.
Nope, that traitor Gorbachev had chosen to 100% privatize the state-owned economy, which resulted the death of USSR.

China had also privatized those small SOEs, but we have kept those large ones, that's why we have survived, but million of Chinese workers had still lost their job because of our mistakes.

When USA wanna convince you to 100% privatize your strategic SOEs, then what are you going to do with this?
Before Gorbachev chose 100% privatize, USSR was already on high risk of bankruptcy, thats why they reduced aid to VN during 80s. 100% privatize the state-owned economy only made USSR collapse faster.

USA is not convincing VN to 100% privatize your strategic SOEs coz they need a strong VN to contain China in East sea now. As I said: VN dont bow down and accept US's rule on our island like China, so we will do what is good for VN despite US like or not :pop:
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom