Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2017
- Messages
- 28,401
- Reaction score
- -82
- Country
- Location
Yeah and F-16s are better. In an Israeli-Syrian case, both in crew and aircraft.
Not necessarily. Both are Semitic speakers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah and F-16s are better. In an Israeli-Syrian case, both in crew and aircraft.
Not necessarily. Both are Semitic speakers.
It's true. They make that halahala sound when they speak. Only Semitics talk like that.
retired and replaced with what? can you get it and do you have the money to buy it?I agree with you in theory, but not in reality.air defense which cannot differ between own and enemy plane should be retired
russia use old technology.u.s has modern sensors which can accurately differentiate between targetsretired and replaced with what? can you get it and do you have the money to buy it?I agree with you in theory, but not in reality.
Russia is not there for Assad. Russia(like many other global powers) is in Syria for regional military strategic advantage.Those 15 crewmates had never thought that they will die due to the fire of their own allies. I don't know why Russian have a so much love for Assad that they are giving their lives away for his crown. strange love
What you dont get is that Russia isnt looking for intelligence. Russia is looking for strategic advantage. As long as Syria under Assad can provide that Assad/SAA can be as dumb as a rock. As a matter of fact, you can take better advantage of a "stupid ally"and that is advantageous.This is what happens when you fight for a stupid ally.
Your point agrees with mine too- Assad doesnt have access to better AD technology, so SAA is using what it has for the time being. Why get rid of "bad weapons"in the middle of a war? Before this incident no one had told SAA to get rid of S-200s. lol. War usually = some collateral damagerussia use old technology.u.s has modern sensors which can accurately differentiate between targets
What you dont get is that Russia isnt looking for intelligence.
Even if i agree with people who say Assad is a : 1) Stupid ally 2) Butcher 3) terrorist, 4) all of the above, what must pain those people now is that Assad as won. so who is stupid?
Not necessarily. Both are Semitic speakers.
"YES, SHOOTING DOWN OUR AIRCRAFT WAS ALL A PART OF OUR GENIUS PLAN TO ARM THE SYRIANS WITH NEW SAM MISSILES, AS IF WE COULDN'T DO IT WITHOUT KILLING 15 RUSSIANS"Here is my honest assessment of the situation. It was a setup and now Russians will give Assad better air defence system.
The plane which was shot down is capable of jamming and incoming SAM.
With USA and NATO preparing for a false flag chemical attack this one jet going down will favor Russia more than any thing to upgrade weaponry under Assad's command.
Israel USA and NATO are screwed now. In next week a plane loaded with new RADAR and SAM will be delivered to Syria.
I wish iran and turkey reach to some consensus and stop the butchry committed by world powers in syria. If it happened then consider your forces a victor because if you both don't care no one else will. Syrian war must need to end now, all sides have equally suffered the losses.Russia is not there for Assad. Russia(like many other global powers) is in Syria for regional military strategic advantage.
whenever USA wont to war with enemy , you can find examples of their system failed to distinguish enemy from friends ,there are many cases they could not detect civilian planes from fighter jets , there are cases they could not even distinguish their own airplane from enemies and had to destroy air defense system or lost a plane , there are cases they bombed their own forces or their allies , there are cases they bombs weddings or school buses ,.......russia use old technology.u.s has modern sensors which can accurately differentiate between targets
its not that S-200 ,had problem , there are cases of patriot lock on friendly airplanes or even lock at Ghosts and fire at nothing , Syria must get rid of S-200 because of other problems not this one.Your point agrees with mine too- Assad doesnt have access to better AD technology, so SAA is using what it has for the time being. Why get rid of "bad weapons"in the middle of a war? Before this incident no one had told SAA to get rid of S-200s. lol. War usually = some collateral damage