What's new

Royal Navy sends its mightiest ship to take on the Iranian

It depends on where the fight happen . to be honest Iran army projection power is nearly nil
but when it come to operating near Iran it can be quiet a headache for the aggressor

when it come to defense I doubt if Iran want to sink all the ship that uk have in persian gulf
then the English can do any thing about it . Iran can hit them with Persian gulf ballistic missile
at the same time we can throw as many as we like of Anti Ship cruise missiles from shore
batteries at them we also can use our fast boat to fire Kowsar missiles from 20-30 mile away
at them (the missile is weak only 20-30 kg warhead but when used in number they can be
Ugly)also we can use those boats and our midget subs to fire Hoot Torpedo at them which
have a speed more than 250 km/h and a range of 10 miles. and don't forget from the weapon
Iran got from China you can find Some EM-52 Mine.

You see in persian gulf we have the advantage . but let say we want to confront them in Indian Ocean
then we loose the use of those fast boats and shore batteries . what remain is several Frigate and 3
Kilo class subs .to be honest it would be a fight that I prefer avoid no matter what the cost is .

HMS Daring will help air defence of south-west gulf aerospace...you won't make naval battle...
think about F-22, B-2 and cruise missiles..
 
.
:rofl:
in 2007, 15 British marines got arrested by Revolutionary guards on small boats
:argh: They could have blown you away. They just did not want to create a serious incident and cause loss of life.
Yet you are hailing it as a great victory.
 
. . .
Whatever gets you off my friend. I can see you and your friends receive intense pleasure from the capture of those sailors.

Those sailors should not have been there in the first place!! They never found any WMD's!! Your greedy, masters were after the oil and nothing else!! It's such a pity that you believe the BS the feed you!! Thank you for letting us know your level of intellect!!
 
.
Those sailors should not have been there in the first place!! They never found any WMD's!! Your greedy, masters were after the oil and nothing else!! It's such a pity that you believe the BS the feed you!! Thank you for letting us know your level of intellect!!
Classic.
In this particular case whether they were in Iranian or Iraqi waters is disputed, as for being there in the first place...I'm sure there are a 1000 other threads on that.
What BS have I mentioned?? In fact what has anything I have said got to do with oil or anything you have said?
As for intellect...might want to brush up on your grammar.
 
.
HMS Daring will help air defence of south-west gulf aerospace...you won't make naval battle...
think about F-22, B-2 and cruise missiles..

well to be honest you can deal with Cruise missiles and Iran showed that it
can deal with the Guidance system of those cruise missiles .also you can have
effective point defense against them

about B2 and F22 I don't think they will be to much effective against the
weapons I mentioned . if you want to detect and destroy those shore
Batteries then you must wait for them to open fire at first and when they
do that at least I believe it'll be a little late to do anything to them ,at least
from the view point of the target ships , more importantly those missiles
are small and have mobile Launchers so they must be very fast to catch with
the launcher after they opened fire.

and against those midget subs and fast missile and torpedo boat I'm 95% sure F22 and B2
are not ideal measure.and also 110% sure Those airplanes are useless against ay sort of
marine mine even the ones from the era of US Civil War
 
.
:argh: They could have blown you away. They just did not want to create a serious incident and cause loss of life.
Yet you are hailing it as a great victory.

How could they have blown us away? I wonder.
 
. .
How could they have blown us away? I wonder.

By emitting foul gas from their behinds! This is one reason why they have so much bad breath!!:azn:

---------- Post added at 01:29 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:27 AM ----------

Well, the sailors had just come from HMS Cornwall.

And finally seeing the light of day, they were so impressed by the Iranians, they decided to go on holiday in Iran!:rofl:

---------- Post added at 01:30 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:29 AM ----------

Classic.
In this particular case whether they were in Iranian or Iraqi waters is disputed, as for being there in the first place...I'm sure there are a 1000 other threads on that.
What BS have I mentioned?? In fact what has anything I have said got to do with oil or anything you have said?
As for intellect...might want to brush up on your grammar.

1) Irrespective of whether they were in Iraqi territorial waters or Iranian territorial waters, they weren't supposed to be in either! But fact is that they were there, and got caught with their pants down, whether you like it or not!

2) "There may be a 1000 other thread on that" - Then you shouldn't have said in post#32 ""They could have blown you away. They just did not want to create a serious incident and cause loss of life." Could have, would have, maybe,....!!! After the death of thousands of people around the globe, because of your greed, spare us your jibber jabber nonsense and go howl and moan somewhere else!

3) Everything that you have said on this thread (including post#32) is BS, and reflects your subservient mentality!

4) "My grammar "- is that all could find to b***h and moan about? I'll fix my grammar when you show me the WMD's in Iraq!
 
.
By emitting foul gas from their behinds! This is one reason why they have so much bad breath!!:azn:

---------- Post added at 01:29 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:27 AM ----------



And finally seeing the light of day, they were so impressed by the Iranians, they decided to go on holiday in Iran!:rofl:

---------- Post added at 01:30 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:29 AM ----------



1) Irrespective of whether they were in Iraqi territorial waters or Iranian territorial waters, they weren't supposed to be in either! But fact is that they were there, and got caught with their pants down, whether you like it or not!

2) "There may be a 1000 other thread on that" - Then you shouldn't have said in post#32 ""They could have blown you away. They just did not want to create a serious incident and cause loss of life." Could have, would have, maybe,....!!! After the death of thousands of people around the globe, because of your greed, spare us your jibber jabber nonsense and go howl and moan somewhere else!

3) Everything that you have said on this thread (including post#32) is BS, and reflects your subservient mentality!

4) "My grammar "- is that all could find to b***h and moan about? I'll fix my grammar when you show me the WMD's in Iraq!

Abu - well said buddy. I think your answer is well supreme and certainly beyond jamies brain capacity!!!!!!!
 
.
well to be honest you can deal with Cruise missiles and Iran showed that it
can deal with the Guidance system of those cruise missiles .also you can have
effective point defense against them

about B2 and F22 I don't think they will be to much effective against the
weapons I mentioned . if you want to detect and destroy those shore
Batteries then you must wait for them to open fire at first and when they
do that at least I believe it'll be a little late to do anything to them ,at least
from the view point of the target ships , more importantly those missiles
are small and have mobile Launchers so they must be very fast to catch with
the launcher after they opened fire.

and against those midget subs and fast missile and torpedo boat I'm 95% sure F22 and B2
are not ideal measure.and also 110% sure Those airplanes are useless against ay sort of
marine mine even the ones from the era of US Civil War

There is another angle to be considered, IF Iran is attacked, Iran could unleash a whole new wave of attacks in Afghanistan against NATO forces with or without Taliban. This is something US/UK have to consider very carefully, can they afford another Vietnam in Afghanistan?

IF memory serves me right Gulbadin Hekmatyar lived in Tehran for quite a few years, after the Taliban came to power. Don't know if he is still there, nonetheless he and his network is an asset the Iranians can still use in Afghanistan.

So this sabre rattling by the west, might actually turn into a disgraceful retreat!!
 
.
That ship is f*cking mine and other tax payers money! :angry:
WTF is it doing there floating in other waters?

Defense spending is fine as long as it's for defense, nothing more nothing less.
It really pisses me off to see that both the torries and labour here are willing to wage wars for no apparent reason.
First it was Afghanistan, then nuke huntin' with George Texas ranger Bush.

I invite you Londoners! To attend this protest in 2 weeks time... I will be attending it along with a few of my buddies.

Sat 28 January 2pm-4pm Picket at US Embassy: No western intervention in Iran or Syria
 
.
By emitting foul gas from their behinds! This is one reason why they have so much bad breath!!:azn:

---------- Post added at 01:29 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:27 AM ----------



And finally seeing the light of day, they were so impressed by the Iranians, they decided to go on holiday in Iran!:rofl:

---------- Post added at 01:30 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:29 AM ----------



1) Irrespective of whether they were in Iraqi territorial waters or Iranian territorial waters, they weren't supposed to be in either! But fact is that they were there, and got caught with their pants down, whether you like it or not!

2) "There may be a 1000 other thread on that" - Then you shouldn't have said in post#32 ""They could have blown you away. They just did not want to create a serious incident and cause loss of life." Could have, would have, maybe,....!!! After the death of thousands of people around the globe, because of your greed, spare us your jibber jabber nonsense and go howl and moan somewhere else!

3) Everything that you have said on this thread (including post#32) is BS, and reflects your subservient mentality!

4) "My grammar "- is that all could find to b***h and moan about? I'll fix my grammar when you show me the WMD's in Iraq!
You seem angry. I'll ignore your stereotyping and holiday 'joke'.
Well we were part of the occupying force in Iraq at the time, we had every right to be there in that sense. My 1000 thread remark was in regards to the debate as to whether the entire Iraq war was justified.
Subservient? To whom in this case? As for everything being BS, you can look some of my points up, they are true.
Jeez you insulted my intellect, so what did you expect? As for the WMD's, I agree with Blair's stance in that I would have gone to war anyway in order to remove Saddam.
I can't wait for your response which will no doubt mention: zionist media, propaganda, western puppets, US dogs/devils. etc etc etc.
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom