Yes, Zionism consider others subhuman and gentile. Im from brooklyn, ive dealt and met more Zionst than you ever would. I know their reality first hand.
I already did and didn't find the word India won you start trolling/ insulting Pakistan Military 30% b@rking that in fornt of India Pakistan armed force is nothing and continually b@rking this rants and off-topic discussions
you're reported your rants/trolling @patman
So we are to believe indians like you whom lying, deception and extreme hatred towards Pakistanis/Muslims is hard-wired into your dna?...........
Also, are we to believe a member of the race who vehemently proclaimed that Pakistan would NEVER EVER become a nuclear weapons state with or without Chinese assistance?.........
indian leaders and other prominent figures have repeatedly called for the destruction of the Pakistani race and nation. But they have NEVER had the courage or capability to even try despite india being 7x bigger than us and having abundant access to the world's most advanced weapons systems whilst we are denied this privilege. If and when they do then come and talk. Otherwise just more retarded indianisms.
Not surprised.
you start trolling/ insulting Pakistan Military 30% b@rking that in fornt of India Pakistan armed force is nothing and continually b@rking this rants and off-topic discussions
It is important for Pakistan to pick its mid-term strategic direction. Does it see an opportunity for an conventional offensive or is it better to position for defence? I think the latter positioning is the best for the short to mid term.Appreciate your detailed response. My thoughts on this subject -
- Up to late 1960s the conventional disparity was insufficient for India to 'cull' Pakistan. Although india still had superiority in numbers but it was nominal and this is reflected in how Pakistan was the aggressor in 1965.
- However from 1971 the disparity increased. From mid 1970s onwards was opportune time for India to destroy - not conquer/annex as that is beyond India but to destroy the Pakistani state. [India has over half a million soldiers stationed to pacify few million Kashmiri's]. This window lasted from 1971 on to early 1990s. Nothing ever is perfect. No war as been fought in ideal circumstances. From perspective of India it was 'the moment' missed. I think this was down to internal weakness in the Indian society. Both countries are not suited for long term, heavy wars of attrition like Europe/Japan were in both WWs.
- Post 1998 and the nuclear dawn the possibility of India attacking or posing a existential threat is in my opinion zero. I cannot see India attacking now when the cost of such mis-adventure would be nuclear war. If India did not do this when the 'window was open' from 1971 to 1990 when the military disparity was the greatest the chance of that now is zero.
- However I think the rivalry between both countries will focus on geo-strategy and the economic field. The critical factor will be which of these countries creates a fair, social, economic, safe, secure and stable internal environment. This is where the rivalry will be played out. This is where Pakistan is losing. We have a reputation as terrorist, radical, misogynist, crazed country on earth and this is reflected in the stock value of Pakistan's passport which lingers right at the bottom with Afghanistan and Syria. This makes Pakistam's position in my estimation even worse then both those countries. At least they are at war and have foreign armies trampling ove them.
- The problem in Pakistan is there is little appetite to tackle this problem. To begin with the in your face use of religion as a commodity has to stop. But the problem is the very elite that should tackle the problem has been cultivating this beast. Religion has been the red flag that has been used to distract and hypnotize the bull called the Pakistani masses. However the good news is with increasing Chinese influence we have a outside party that has the means and the reasons to push the elite to sort out the madhouse we call Pakistan. I am placing lot of store on the China factor in taming the rampent fake religious piety that has wrought destruction and obfuscated from what needs to be done instead Pakistan. Some of that is apparent even on this forum.
- To be sure Pakistan should have enjoyed the nuclear dividend. That is with MAD in place and Indian threat efectively checkmated the conventional size of Pak military should have been drastically cut by as much as 30%. We do not need masses of armour when huge tank protracted tank battle will not take place as soon the nuclear 'click' will kick in. However because of no civilian oversight of Pak armed forces and the institutional inertia - no organizations likes saying 'look we need to downsize' this has not happened. The resources saved could be spent on beefing up internal security forces and establish the effective law and order within the country.
- I think the rivalry between Pakistan and India is not neccassrily a bad thing. Only we need to focus on the economic, health and sports. This can only help both peoples to rise. We have too many poor people.
- On another note your post brings out what I have been saying for a long time. Pakistan does have a geographic reality underpining it. You alluded to it. The Indus Valley is effectively differantiated from rest of South Asia by first the Rann of Kutch which I have shown as red and the [ii]Thar Desert which I have shown as yellow. Only in the northern portion of both Punjabs does the divide become fuzzy. For vast majority of Pakistan/India border there exists the real physical differantiation.
@Cybernetics @Joe Shearer
