What's new

Pakistan Vs Bangladesh

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
So Pakistan again lives upto the reputation of making heroes out of unknown debutants like was the case in past.... two time dropped and then finally allowed to make a century .....so annoying
 
.
So Pakistan again lives upto the reputation of making heroes out of unknown debutants like was the case in past.... two time dropped and then finally allowed to make a century .....so annoying
Thats why Pakistani team stand as a true entertainer...
 
. .
Good game, congratz to Nasir Hossein, as for Pakistan, keep it up :thinktank:
 
.
Assalam alaikum

mubarak pak team ko and a big mubarak to bangladesh they fought well

TARIQ

They were made to fought well after dropping 3 catches otherwise they would have been all out under 100 runs ...it was 19-4 at one stage ...Nasir was dropped by younus in slip, then again he was dropped by the keeper when the team score was in early 30's ...that was a sitter ...even a non-regular keeper would have taken that...let alone the specialist one...had that catch been taken it would have bangladesh 31-5 then Sakib was dropped by hafeez

Sarfraz's position in the team is really getting ambiguous as he has not contributed much with the bat in all the matches he has played...his batting average is 10 ...and his wicket keeping is too getting fragile .... I think Pak team should try Umar akmal as a wicket keeper and include Asad shafiq
 
.
They were made to fought well after dropping 3 catches otherwise they would have been all out under 100 runs ...it was 19-4 at one stage ...Nasir was dropped by younus in slip, then again he was dropped by the keeper when the team score was in early 30's ...that was a sitter ...even a non-regular keeper would have taken that...let alone the specialist one...had that catch been taken it would have bangladesh 31-5 then Sakib was dropped by hafeez

Sarfraz's position in the team is really getting ambiguous as he has not contributed much with the bat in all the matches he has played...his batting average is 10 ...and his wicket keeping is too getting fragile .... I think Pak team should try Umar akmal as a wicket keeper and include Asad shafiq

Totally agree with you. Now we have made a hero out of a mediocre player thanks to our pathetic fielding. Umar should be the wicketkeeper of Pakistan. That would give us the place to try an extra player. Someone talented like Hammad Azam.
 
.
They were made to fought well after dropping 3 catches otherwise they would have been all out under 100 runs ...it was 19-4 at one stage ...Nasir was dropped by younus in slip, then again he was dropped by the keeper when the team score was in early 30's ...that was a sitter ...even a non-regular keeper would have taken that...let alone the specialist one...had that catch been taken it would have bangladesh 31-5 then Sakib was dropped by hafeez

Sarfraz's position in the team is really getting ambiguous as he has not contributed much with the bat in all the matches he has played...his batting average is 10 ...and his wicket keeping is too getting fragile .... I think Pak team should try Umar akmal as a wicket keeper and include Asad shafiq
Sarfraz's as a batsman is very good player, I don't know what is problem with him ?not responding wat all efforts he had done to get back in team as a batsman WK . I don't know why shoib malik or Imran farhat are in team ? Asad shafiq is a pretty much talented and I wonder why selectors are wasting Hammad Azam too... Lots of blunder are still going on but its doesn't matters if team is performing well.... :pakistan:
 
.
They were made to fought well after dropping 3 catches otherwise they would have been all out under 100 runs ...it was 19-4 at one stage ...Nasir was dropped by younus in slip, then again he was dropped by the keeper when the team score was in early 30's ...that was a sitter ...even a non-regular keeper would have taken that...let alone the specialist one...had that catch been taken it would have bangladesh 31-5 then Sakib was dropped by hafeez

Sarfraz's position in the team is really getting ambiguous as he has not contributed much with the bat in all the matches he has played...his batting average is 10 ...and his wicket keeping is too getting fragile .... I think Pak team should try Umar akmal as a wicket keeper and include Asad shafiq

Agreed

actually i thought bangladesh was due to an embarassing defeat but our guys came to their help but still they built on that
the main objection of kamran was he didnot do his real duty that is wicket keeping though he was not bad on batting but sarfraz could not do any good in either roll.

TARIQ
 
.
Sarfraz's as a batsman is very good player, I don't know what is problem with him ?not responding wat all efforts he had done to get back in team as a batsman WK . I don't know why shoib malik or Imran farhat are in team ? Asad shafiq is a pretty much talented and I wonder why selectors are wasting Hammad Azam too... Lots of blunder are still going on but its doesn't matters if team is performing well.... :pakistan:

There have been many players who have done well in domestic cricket but haven't performed well at all in international arena examples are Shahzaib hassan, Imran Farhat, Taqufeeq Umer , Khalid Latif etc and now Sarfaraz Ahmed

If a player performs well in domestic cricket doesn't necessarily mean that he will do the same in international cricket ...its hell a lot different ball game ....

I was and am never in favor of Imran Farhat .... i should better go with Asad shafiq as an opener and Hamad Azam or Abdul Raazaq at lower middle order in place of Imran Farhat and Sarfaraz while trying Umer akmal as a wicket keeper like Sangakara do for SL
 
.
There have been many players who have done well in domestic cricket but haven't performed well at all in international arena examples are Shahzaib hassan, Imran Farhat, Taqufeeq Umer , Khalid Latif etc and now Sarfaraz Ahmed

If a player performs well in domestic cricket doesn't necessarily mean that he will do the same in international cricket ...its hell a lot different ball game ....

I was and am never in favor of Imran Farhat .... i should better go with Asad shafiq as an opener and Hamad Azam or Abdul Raazaq at lower middle order in place of Imran Farhat and Sarfaraz while trying Umer akmal as a wicket keeper like Sangakara do for SL
No! When I said sarfraz had worked hard that I meant to say I had seen sarfraz and how he started to increase his batting average , Sarfraz improved his batting by working hard , while if you talk about Akmal brothers as a batsman They are God Gifted. sarfraz is not like shazaib hassan,.. He is a ideal player for difficult condition and his speciality is to take care of one end
and keep taking single doubles...
Yea ODI, t20 and test all are different ball game and sarfraz and Adnan are ideal as Keeper.
 
.
They were made to fought well after dropping 3 catches otherwise they would have been all out under 100 runs ...it was 19-4 at one stage ...Nasir was dropped by younus in slip, then again he was dropped by the keeper when the team score was in early 30's ...that was a sitter ...even a non-regular keeper would have taken that...let alone the specialist one...had that catch been taken it would have bangladesh 31-5 then Sakib was dropped by hafeez

Sarfraz's position in the team is really getting ambiguous as he has not contributed much with the bat in all the matches he has played...his batting average is 10 ...and his wicket keeping is too getting fragile .... I think Pak team should try Umar akmal as a wicket keeper and include Asad shafiq

ary yaar how much matches sarfraz has played???, he has a good technique and thats important, in the last matches with sarfaraz, akmal has also downed his performace except that 90 runs

umer akmal keeping is very pathetic, he cant catch anything

sarfaraz has taking some awesome catches, last match, and his stumping is awesome, catches win matches and so does stumping, his stumping of jayawardene was the turning point of an already lost match

he averages big time in the domestic and he needs to be properly settled, because if we try shuffling players, nobody is gonna settle and thus not a properly settled team
 
.
ary yaar how much matches sarfraz has played???, he has a good technique and thats important, in the last matches with sarfaraz, akmal has also downed his performace except that 90 runs

umer akmal keeping is very pathetic, he cant catch anything

sarfaraz has taking some awesome catches, last match, and his stumping is awesome, catches win matches and so does stumping, his stumping of jayawardene was the turning point of an already lost match

he averages big time in the domestic and he needs to be properly settled, because if we try shuffling players, nobody is gonna settle and thus not a properly settled team

He has played enough matches in UAE and now here is BD and seriously speaking his performance is pathetic both in batting and wicket keeping. Yes he is a good keeper but certainly not the best. And his batting is just ordinary. Umar is a massively talented batsman and can't be compared with Sarfaraz as far as batting is concerned. And if you have checked his wicket keeping then it is good not extra ordinary though. So I would go with Umar Akmal any day since it would give us a place for an extra all rounder.
 
.
He has played enough matches in UAE and now here is BD and seriously speaking his performance is pathetic both in batting and wicket keeping. Yes he is a good keeper but certainly not the best. And his batting is just ordinary. Umar is a massively talented batsman and can't be compared with Sarfaraz as far as batting is concerned. And if you have checked his wicket keeping then it is good not extra ordinary though. So I would go with Umar Akmal any day since it would give us a place for an extra all rounder.

since how many times sarfaraz has batted?? he has played in only 15 ODIs over all and in only 9 times he actually batted and remained not out in 2, so in total 7 innings , shut up now!!

Sarfraz Ahmed | Pakistan Cricket | Cricket Players and Officials | ESPN Cricinfo
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom