Assuming that they haven't but I assume they also haven't said "Please let them kill Pakistanis". The protection of your airspace is a given. Furthermore it goes back to overthrowing Zardari first, because Zardari is a US puppet and Kiyani is now believed to be one too. So remove Zardari and see what happens. Imran has has shamed the COAS he has not called for his resignation, yet.
The government could not even prosecute a CIA contractor, I think you know the answer to 'will it order the PA and PAF to shoot down US aircraft.
Protection of airspace is a given, but wikileaks indicate that an unofficial agreement between Pakistan and the US exists on the issued of drone strikes - I believe Zardari was quoted quite explicitly in favor of US operated drone strikes. As such, there is no doubt that the GoP needs to come clean with the Pakistani people and issue a clear command to shoot down the drones if the US does not stop drone strikes in Pakistan, and we can hold Kiyani and Rao Qamar Suleiman (ACM) responsible if those orders are no implemented.
The problem emerges when you look at Pakistan as a fake democracy. Is Kayani running the government like a Kaakar government? Put a gun to everyone's head and make them do and say whatever he wants to?
Look - the Army has always derived its power and influence through the support of the people, and typically it has influenced the elected governments to support hawkish foreign and nuclear policies, that have the support of most Pakistanis.
The Army will have no power if it tries to force an elected government to implement policies that Pakistanis find deeply unpopular - Zardari and Nawaz Sharif would probably welcome such an attempt by the Army, since they could run to the media and bash it endlessly, and the Army would be helpless in the face of public pressure and outrage.
There can be little doubt that the PPP at least is supporting drone strikes, and the Army is going along under Kiyani.
Kiyani himself is the one who stoked the issue by giving the statement intolerable - there by giving the impression there is no Pakistani sanctioning to the Drones, there by automatically reverting to the defaults.
Sure, and Gillani seconded him - so lets see Gillani issue an official statement for the US to end drone strikes or have them shot down. I will hold Kiyani and Suleiman responsible then if they refuse to implement the GoP's orders.
And lets face it, when the revolution happens it won't be in a court of law. Either you get straight, or else our avaam isn't as shareef as the Egyptians, it will also break into everyone's "houses" and do some literal overthrowing. So hiding behind semantics may would not necessarily work. Moreover let me bring you back again, that the emphasis was on overthrowing Zardari, and the Kiyani statement was a mockery over his Oscar winning performance of indignation over the last post-Raymond Davis drone attack.
If you want proper change, then focus on the correct institution - the government. The Army is not running the show. Pressure the government to comply with the demands of Pakistanis, and then the ball is in the court of the military - will they respect the decision of the civilian government to take on the US or not? Until then there is no justification for criticizing the Army - they are not in power anymore, and we should stop acting like they are and force our elected leadership to be honest and straight with us.
The kicking out would be more in the form of overthrowing than anything peaceful. The option of voluntarily quitting has been given to them which is quite democratic once you can see you have lost the confidence of the nation. If they refuse to do so, the nation can opt to overthrow them as well. It won't be process oriented but at that time no one would really care.
Please see my previous posts on the fact that 'kicking out' does not have any feasible plans for a replacement government.
They could have presented a charge, given a statement other than "They don't know Davis". Again the issue is clear when you think in terms of intent. If they wanted to, they could've ensured that they make the Espionage claim sure. There would be enough pressure on the DAG to ensure that the espionage charge stuck.
Do we want a proper democracy where every institution functions as it should or do we want to continue playing these games with ISI/Army subterfuge and lack of transparency in governance? Hold the PPP and PML-N responsible, they are the ones elected to do these jobs. If the ISI/Army does not cooperate, summon them to court and point it out and shame them and remove the leadership of those institutions for not complying with the law
Enough of this 'cloak and dagger' nonsense - lets focus on the fact that Pakistanis elected these people to govern, and they are failing miserably and we need to kick them out and bring in fresh faces. When the Army refuses to listen to the civilian government that Pakistanis elected, we can hurl , abuse and criticism at them as well. But not right now, when the Army is in fact acting constitutionally.