FOOLS_NIGHTMARE
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2018
- Messages
- 18,063
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As their first modern fighter they had to start somewhere; in that way it reminds me of the SAAB Viggen. They got better and made the J-20, but like you said a design based on the consideration that they had to fit the Al-31 into the airframe.I've never liked the hunch back bulge of the J-10, makes it look squat and disproportioned, unlike the clean lines of the Viper. An outcome of having to adapt the AL-31 series engines for a single engine fighter design.
Hi, is there any review from PAF pilots regarding J-10CP capability? I want to read it
I dont visit regularly. What is your question about ? Lylka engines or AECC engines. If your question is with ref to AECC engines, the answer is yes, they r all based on Lylka engines upto all preturbine stages & chinese need russian permission.Not saying you're lying, but how reliable is this information? Because some members have been talking about the WS-10B engine being used.
We are not manufacturing aero-engines. Russians have agreed with china to transfer Lylka based technology to foreign customers eg malaysia, pakistan. Engine manufacturing is a different level. Too late for us now. Miltary mind and technical mind operate at different levels. Personally i am not happy with J10 in our colors.@messiach
Ma'am. Aap kay muh mein ghee shakar!! Just to confirm, are you saying ToT for production of Al-31 in Pakistan from raw materials or higher depot level maintenance? If its the former that ought to be the best news in a long time. Thank you for sharing!
Why not happy with j10 in paf?We are not manufacturing aero-engines. Russians have agreed with china to transfer Lylka based technology to foreign customers eg malaysia, pakistan. Engine manufacturing is a different level. Too late for us now. Miltary mind and technical mind operate at different levels. Personally i am not happy with J10 in our colors.
She is happyWhy not happy with j10 in paf?
In addition to local assembly of AESA, J10 comes with AL-31 ToT. We are looking towards a greater russian input in our NGFA program.
Not saying you're lying, but how reliable is this information? Because some members have been talking about the WS-10B engine being used.
Not even sure why such misinformation is being tolerated, regardless of the members background.I really don't understand why are you still claiming such BS!?
Really!? Once you have been such a valuable contributor, credible, reliable and honest ... and why now this?
Yes, plain and simple, she is lying!
And not "some members have been talking about the WS-10B engine being used", it is simply a fact.
Anyone who denies that these are WS-10B engines and even more spreads such BS, these would be AL-31 is either plain stupid and stubborn or a troll who deliberately spreads lies!
This is a WS-10B, there's nothing to deny anymore.
View attachment 880528
Not even sure why such misinformation is being tolerated, regardless of the members background.
J-10's aerodynamics are different to F-16, and are similar to Eurofighter and Rafale. Such canard designs are inherently unstable, and require their flight computer to keep them stable.This instability is useful to attain enhanced maneuverability, this might also be the reason for the shape.I've never liked the hunch back bulge of the J-10, makes it look squat and disproportioned, unlike the clean lines of the Viper. An outcome of having to adapt the AL-31 series engines for a single engine fighter design.