I am obviously not privy to all the details, especially the really sensitive ones, and I suspect nor are you.
What we know is that the US administration didn't trust Pakistan enough with the information, even at the risk of greatly complicating the operation.
We also see the comments from senior US officials including the president which reinforces the same point.
So there are issues of trust and it is based on information which is not all in the public domain.
Dear poster,
For some reason you missed this point:
ISI/Pak army and US army have performed 1000s of missions together. And if the best you could come with is the stuff above, then I say my dear poster, it is flawed conclusion at best.
Killing Ben Fing Ladeen was a very sensitive mission from many many different angles both political and military.
There was fear (miscalculation) that Paksitani Mullahs will fill the streets, burn down the cities, and bring down AZ government.
Luckily this didn't happen. But the fear were not totally misplaced.
There was a plan in place to make sure it would be USA only operation. Even Saudis refused to have anything to do with it. They too were worried about backlash in Saudi.
You want to look at this affair only from one angle, but the US admn and Pak army was looking at it from many many angles.
Prez Obama never accused anyone in Pak if you want to imply this in your post.
Only some mid- low level advisers did the chest thumping and BTW they were strongly admonished by State department and the DOD.
No one even US admn had realized that 10 years afer 9/11 Qaida has become irrelevant in Arab streets. Especially after Arab spring, who gives an f to Qaida and its dead leader.
However stabilization of Afghanistan and Pak FATA is a serious work that will take years if not decades to come. And that my dear poster cannot be done without the help of Pak army.
This is why I said earlier, it is a team effort. One team member scoring one goal doesn't mean we should start infighting and destroy the team from within.
peace.