Your explanation is wrong.
You are entitled to your opinion but it would help if you actually tried to rationalise, or is it your wet dream that americans jsut hate us for no reason
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your explanation is wrong.
Isn't that the true question afterall... Why did US Chose that scenario????
that was a face saver.Robert Grenier's actions can be called disaster management.
You are entitled to your opinion but it would help if you actually tried to rationalise, or is it your wet dream that americans jsut hate us for no reason
Okay , Pak Army did not know , the ISI did not know , Pak Govt did not know and the world buys this version and of course, we are very naive.
Thank you very much for the clarification !
I already explained. The Americans didn't trust you enough. They thought the information will be certainly compromised, they believed that parts of your army and ISI are hands in glove with AQ/Taliban.
They had good reasons to think so.
So what? They believed Iraq had WMDs too.
Your explanation is wrong.
They got it right this time. They had the weight of evidence.
Bin ladin was in bed with ISI for many years now as he was seen as a state asset everyone knew he was in Pakistan all along.
Mobile phone links Pakistan's ISI to Osama bin Laden courier - Telegraph
Bin ladin was in bed with ISI for many years now as he was seen as a state asset everyone knew he was in Pakistan all along.
Mobile phone links Pakistan's ISI to Osama bin Laden courier - Telegraph