Quite pathetic. A few people do crap and you condemn a whole nation and hope innocent people die. Can't get much lower than this.
He is not blaming the "few people" who did drastic things, because such "few people" are there in every country. In total, there might be more terrorist sympathizer in India, than in Canada because of the large population.
He is directly blaming the Canadian government because the actions of blocking Indian investigators to terrorist cells are undertaken by the Canadian government, which directly represents the Nation of Canada. It's been practiced by the nation of Canada like a policy. Hence, the blame on the entire nation.
As far as innocent people are concerned, some are bound to die depending on whom do the terrorists choose. If some innocents don't die in Canada, then some are sure to die in India. So out of these two innocent groups, which one is the more deserving candidate, the one that voted for politicians who openly harbor and protect these terrorists, or the one whom these terrorists want to target and dream of turning that country into an Islamic Caliphate? No problem as long as it's not Canada.
No one likes for innocent people to die. But just for strategic inroads, Americans couldn't care less about the massacres of the world before 9/11 took place. Even Australians had to wait and have a relook at their immigration policies and conduct that infamous raid but... AFTER the plot of beheading WITHIN Australia surfaced.
What are the chances Canada would be any wiser?