@ ganimi kawa
I'm sorry mate, but it seems to not really read my posts!
It is from the official and final FAB report (not the early fake that placed the Gripen at first!), this was even confirmed from Brazilian MoD officials and I was even in contact with one of them. The parts I marked proves the figures I gave before for Gripen, SH and Rafale and that's what you asked me for right? So it was relevant, moreover the part for Rafale clearly said, that the initial fly away cost that was proposed at the begining was $136 millions, but later was reduced to $78 and now take point 1. to account that I gave you in my first post:
1. The costs for the developing country, or the partners are different to costs for normal export customers, because costs for R&D are not included!
So when France (the developing country) pays $82.3 millions without R&D...$136 fly away for an export customer with R&D...proves exaclty what I said. It's obvious that Dassault tries everything to seal the first export deal and therefor reduced the cost, but as I said, the final price will depend on the numbers Brazil really want to order at the end.
Another figure from the Saudi deal:
96 Rafales F2 were offered for $8.32 billions => $86.66 millions each
72 EFs T2 were offered for $8.86 billions => $123.05 millions each
Arabian Aerospace - D-Days for Rafale
Saudis Pay 4.43 Billion Pounds for 72 Eurofighters (Update5) - Bloomberg
Even in the recent report of the British Telegraph, it was stated:
The disclosure is a significant boost for the Typhoon consortium, but it must now address Indian concerns that the Eurofighter is more expensive than its competitors in upfront costs. British, German, Spanish and Italian officials are confident however that it will be cheaper than its competitors over the lifetime of its deployment.
UK closes in on $11bn fighter deal - Telegraph
As you can see the Rafale is cheaper than the EF and even the partners can't say anything against it but that it will be cheaper in time.
Btw, you are contradicting yourself, because although you wanted to prove that EF is cheaper, your own sources confirmed that EF partners pays $106 millions fly away (only the fighter and engines) each unit, while France only pays $82 million!
As I said I am not joining the discussion, because I knew it would end up like this, active cancellation is not proven for Rafale, neither was PIMAWS ever integrated into EF! This discussion of you guys will lead nowhere when you not base it on available facts, that are cleared for the EF T3 and Rafale F3+ versions that are on offer for MMRCA and instead speculate about things that are not real.
Have fun guys but keep the discussions fair and don't get rude!
....
to eurofighter 
