What's new

Is it time India rethinks her policy of supporting cross-border terrorism?

[..]
Since then, the insurgency has spread like wildfire over 40% of India’s land area, encompassing 20 of the country’s 28 states, including 223 districts (up from 55 in 2003) out of a total of 640. The seven most affected Indian states in terms of fatalities are Chattisgarh, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Maharashtra, Orissa, Bihar, and Andhra Pradesh, in that order. These regions comprise the “Red Corridor.” About 10,000 people have been killed in the expanding civil war since 1980. The Maoists wield about 20,000 armed fighters and another 50,000 supporters. The Indian government complains that the insurgency has crippled economic activity in Central and Eastern India.
[..]

Maoist Insurgency Spreads to Over 40% of India. Mass Poverty and Delhi’s Embrace of Corporate Neoliberalism Fuels Social Uprising

I know the state of denials Indians are living is too deep, but we'll keep trying to bring them to reality once in a while.

Lol i can give you a better source saying how Pakistan is a failed state. lol Also see the author probably another Pakistani
Madrassah educated. If India had so many insurgencies you think Pakistan will miss the chance haha, And we are in denial such a joke your lot is.
 
You forgot to mention spy pigeons and camels. :lol:

At the end of the day that is your intellectual bankruptcy where you completely fail to see the massive terror infrastructure in your own country. but instead would go into the the mundane.

Go on, if that floats your boat...drop some more acronyms but that doesn't change the fact that Indian support for terrorism in the neighborhood is spanned over more than half a century.

Sri Lanka had to bleed for decades because of Indian terrorism.

Pakistan had to bleed for decades and still bleeding due to Indian terrorism. So obviously some reaction is ought to happen.

That is why we are trying to find a way to get rid of it for once and all.

Sri- Lanka's LTTE came into direct conflict by the IPKF. as ar as Pakistan's terrorists are concerned, ask your military about them. afterall all were bred by them, ow wen the roosters have come home to roost, you want to blame India....

There is no turning back when you start to believe your own lies.
 
Sri- Lanka's LTTE came into direct conflict by the IPKF. .

This is exactly the problem with Indians: First they create terrorist proxies to spread havoc in neighboring countries for decades and once these proxies are almost defeated they jump in to claim that it was them who defeated those terrorists.

WOW...Is there a small shred of shame that you people have in you?

At the end of the day, India will be reaping what she has been sowing for more than half a century.

Think about it, and revise your policy of spreading terrorism in the neighborhood. That would be a big win-win for everyone.
 
This is exactly the problem with Indians: First they create terrorist proxies to spread havoc in neighboring countries for decades and once these proxies are almost defeated they jump in to claim that it was them who defeated those terrorists.

WOW...Is there a small shred of shame that you people have in you?

At the end of the day, India will be reaping what she has been sowing for more than half a century.

Think about it, and revise your policy of spreading terrorism in the neighborhood. That would be a big win-win for everyone.
there is no cure for your intellectual myopia...
 
there is no cure for your intellectual myopia...

Lets talk about facts:

1) Have you not financed, trained, armed LTTE?
2) Have you not financed, trained, armed Mukti Bahini?

Lets start with that and see if we can bring you back to reality...
 
This is a serious question to Indians.

Do you think, it is now the right time that India rethinks her policy of supporting cross-border terrorism in the neighboring countries?

Supporting terrorist organizations such as LTTE, Mukti Bahini, BLA or TTP might have given her tactical advantage for time being, but her own fault lines such as having insurgencies in more than 20 states means, this can seriously backfire.

Because at some time neighbors might have had enough and start giving more than just moral support to those oppressed people in India.

Isn't it the right time to get rid of Ajit Devil, Manohar and other extremist hindus who are hell bound on destroying the neighboring countries?

Wouldn't it be better to work for peace instead of spreading proxy warfare?

What do you (Indians) think about stopping to use terrorism as a tool in the neighborhood? Win-win for all, no?
forget what we did in response to your policy of belled india dry thru 1000 cuts policy be very very afraid and worried what will be owr new response to your security establishments latest endevours to revitalise sectraian terrorism in indian punjab cause this time neither USA nor US/Canada are going to help your nation with it .... so good luck your nation will need lots of it in coming future :sarcastic:
 
This is a serious question to Indians.

Do you think, it is now the right time that India rethinks her policy of supporting cross-border terrorism in the neighboring countries?

Supporting terrorist organizations such as LTTE, Mukti Bahini, BLA or TTP might have given her tactical advantage for time being, but her own fault lines such as having insurgencies in more than 20 states means, this can seriously backfire.

Because at some time neighbors might have had enough and start giving more than just moral support to those oppressed people in India.

Isn't it the right time to get rid of Ajit Devil, Manohar and other extremist hindus who are hell bound on destroying the neighboring countries?

Wouldn't it be better to work for peace instead of spreading proxy warfare?

What do you (Indians) think about stopping to use terrorism as a tool in the neighborhood? Win-win for all, no?

How many countries in the world(including your legendary Ummah) support your point of view that India supports cross-border terrorism in Pakistan??
 
forget what we did in response to your policy of belled india dry thru 1000 cuts policy be very very afraid and worried what will be owr new response to your security establishments latest endevours to revitalise sectraian terrorism in indian punjab cause this time neither USA nor US/Canada are going to help your nation with it .... so good luck your nation will need lots of it in coming future :sarcastic:

I see Indians repeating this 1000 cuts thing like a broken record on these forums and saying that some crooked person in Pakistan said that in 80s.

So just for the argument sake, lets ASSUME this is true. How exactly is supporting, financing, arming terrorists like LTTE, Mukti Bahini terrorists is Indian response to that 1000 cuts theory?
 
This is a serious question to Indians.

Do you think, it is now the right time that India rethinks her policy of supporting cross-border terrorism in the neighboring countries?

Supporting terrorist organizations such as LTTE, Mukti Bahini, BLA or TTP might have given her tactical advantage for time being, but her own fault lines such as having insurgencies in more than 20 states means, this can seriously backfire.

Because at some time neighbors might have had enough and start giving more than just moral support to those oppressed people in India.

Isn't it the right time to get rid of Ajit Devil, Manohar and other extremist hindus who are hell bound on destroying the neighboring countries?

Wouldn't it be better to work for peace instead of spreading proxy warfare?

What do you (Indians) think about stopping to use terrorism as a tool in the neighborhood? Win-win for all, no?
We have just started ground work reacently,you will see more Indian engagement in Pakistan in a year or two.
 
Lets talk about facts:

1) Have you not financed, trained, armed LTTE?
2) Have you not financed, trained, armed Mukti Bahini?

Lets start with that and see if we can bring you back to reality...
we paid price of financing LTTE and we have sent IPKF to crush the rebellion and they stayed their for two years for which we had to loose one of owr PMs

as for mukti bahini they were born as deu to your elites reluctance to share power with them we just used them and bangladesh was born + your nations destiny changed from that day and still you are dreaming for revenge

so you tried the same in J&K & Punjab and now trying to revitalise it but have forgotten they were diffrent times make no mistake no one is going to sympathise with your point of view now

but we wont show any merci this time be sacered be very very scared but guess what your nation thinks their time has come now and will do the opposite as required and this is exactly what we want :devil:
 
We have just started ground work reacently,you will see more Indian engagement in Pakistan in a year or two.

Here comes another one gloating about how great India ground work is to support terrorist proxies in the neighborhood....
 
Yes , I think that India should re- think its policy and start supporting terrorist s in Pakistan as a tit for tat measure. Every life lost in India should be avenged with 10 from Pakistan
 
I see Indians repeating this 1000 cuts thing like a broken record on these forums and saying that some crooked person in Pakistan said that in 80s.

So just for the argument sake, lets ASSUME this is true. How exactly is supporting, financing, arming terrorists like LTTE, Mukti Bahini terrorists is Indian response to that 1000 cuts theory?
thats your nations biggest problem you people dont take things on their facts rather on your assumptions :haha:

but in 1980s USA needed you for their war against USSR and now you yourself have burnt that bridge and USA is siding with iran and india for new route to afghanistan and central asia

so dont worry do what ever you can ..... but make no mistake we wont fire the first shot :devil:
 
  1. Hizb-ul-Mujahideen (HM)

  2. Harkat-ul-Ansar (HuA, presently known asHarkat-ul Mujahideen)

  3. Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT)

  4. Jaish-e-Mohammad Mujahideen E-Tanzeem(JeM)

  5. Harkat-ul Mujahideen(HuM, previously known as Harkat-ul-Ansar)

  6. Al Badr

  7. Jamait-ul-Mujahideen(JuM)

  8. Lashkar-e-Jabbar (LeJ)

  9. Harkat-ul-Jehad-al-Islami(HUJI)

  10. Muttahida Jehad Council(MJC)

  11. Al Barq

  12. Tehrik-ul-Mujahideen

  13. Al Jehad

  14. Jammu & Kashir National Liberation Army

  15. People’s League

  16. Muslim Janbaz Force

  17. Kashmir Jehad Force

  18. Al Jehad Force (combines Muslim Janbaz Force and Kashmir Jehad Force)

  19. Al Umar Mujahideen

  20. Mahaz-e-Azadi

  21. Islami Jamaat-e-Tulba

  22. Jammu & Kashmir Students Liberation Front

  23. Ikhwan-ul-Mujahideen

  24. Islamic Students League

  25. Tehrik-e-Hurriat-e-Kashmir

  26. Tehrik-e-Nifaz-e-Fiqar Jafaria

  27. Al Mustafa Liberation Fighters

  28. Tehrik-e-Jehad-e-Islami

  29. Muslim Mujahideen

  30. Al Mujahid Force

  31. Tehrik-e-Jehad

  32. Islami Inquilabi Mahaz
How about a rethink on these....
as opposed to your own Terrorist PM openly admitting that India was involved in supporting terror , you actually have 0 proof that we are are supporting even a single one of the above mentioned groups. See the Irony ?
 
This is a serious question to Pakistanis.

Is it time Pakistan rethinks her policy of supporting killing of cute puppies and kittens?

Supporting puppy-and-kitten-killing organizations such as TPP, TKP or Al-Puppida might have given her evilness advantage for time being, but her own fault lines such as having puppy killings in more than 20 states means, this can seriously backfire.

Because at some time people of the world might have had enough and start giving more than just moral support to those oppressed puppies and kittens in Pakistan.

Wouldn't it be better to work for peace instead of spreading puppicide?

What do you (Pakistanis) think about stopping to use puppy-and-kitten-killing as a tool in the neighborhood? Win-win for all, no?

 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom