Iranian Version of RQ-170 Drone Makes Maiden Flight

[Serpentine]

I don't understand your trolling against 500.
I thought you already had enough brain as a sharif alumni, to understand that joke size is obviously about 30-40% tops of the size of RQ-170, and it is obviously a RC, which has used an antenna for its control, which makes it impossible to be used in the announced range. Also, I thought you already know such antenna makes it impossible for such thing to be stealthy.
BTW, as a mod, you needed to post your reply in the appropriate thread, unless you knew you were going off-topic and trolling.

Dude, don't play the 'smart one' here for me. I'm the first on in this thread who said it's most probably not a 1:1 model.
The reason that @500's trolling needed answer is that his reasoning was so stupid that I couldn't believe it at first, and you thanking his post is raising serious doubts over who is supposed to have brains! Isn't that the irony?

I mean that post is soooo stupid that you should be even ashamed liking it, let alone bragging for me about it.

I have my own reasons to believe it's not a 1:1 model, but that post... gave me a heart attack from laughing.
If you see @rahi2357 reply to that post, you will notice who seriously should doubt about the brain thing.

now it's bigger than a b-2 . by your genius way to measure it , every one can get it's favorite size. win win

View attachment 150506

View attachment 150505


as @Serpentine mentioned : you don't know the length of runway or the distance from camera to the drone or someone standing besides it, it's impossible to judge its size. As a think tank, it's expected from you to contribute to threads by providing a technical discussion, not a blind troll attempt that even a small girl would know it's ridiculous.

View attachment 150514

No its not.



View attachment 150486
View attachment 150488

 

[500]

You may want to compare vids of S-129 and US drones spotted above Syria lately. No difference in size when filmed from such distance.

Size in sky? Ever heard about zoom?

Why Iran did not release any normal footage of it that we could see its real size? Why they film it from the distance with camera on ground so it will look bigger and no one near so we could not see its actual size? I am still waiting for any normal footage.

BTW this time there was helicopter escorting it. So why there is no top footage while its on runway?? Like here:

Or like here:

So first find me any normal video of S-129 or Iranian RQ-170 flying then talk. I am waiting for 2 years already.

 

[SOHEIL]

Compare the size:

View attachment 150403

View attachment 150404

I wonder if someone takes it seriously.

Hey Mr.five hundred...

Your last comparison (60 cm) ended like this:

Wanna play?

 

[kollang]

These are the weapons, Shabah (Iranian RQ-170) might use.

Ra'ad 301 JDAM
https://defence.pk/attachments/978494b45d5ee79d8e695614e487caa7-jpg.121524/

Sadid
https://defence.pk/attachments/c948eb70e1d6d3e112c90b47e89f93ad-jpg.122872/

As @SOHEIL said

 

[rmi5]

Dude, don't play the 'smart one' here for me. I'm the first on in this thread who said it's most probably not a 1:1 model.
The reason that @500's trolling needed answer is that his reasoning was so stupid that I couldn't believe it at first, and you thanking his post is raising serious doubts over who is supposed to have brains! Isn't that the irony?

I mean that post is soooo stupid that you should be even ashamed liking it, let alone bragging for me about it.

I have my own reasons to believe it's not a 1:1 model, but that post... gave me a heart attack from laughing.
If you see @rahi2357 reply to that post, you will notice who seriously should doubt about the brain thing.

There was/is no problem with @500's posts. @rahi2357 basically said nothing but a one statement trolling, and you gave him 1 positive rating for trolling which was pathetic as your mullah friend says. Anyway, instead of childish play games, tell me your true opinion. is it a scaled down RC model as I said or not?
PS. 500 usually receives a thank from me whenever I read his posts, for his good reputation of his informative posts, even if I don't completely read a post of him.

 

[SOHEIL]

It's Clear .
This is RC not UAV .
Who still use antenna ?

View attachment 150441

Even if it was real , it will fall when it exposed to jamming .

Genius!

This is just for test flight not...

For God's sake is there any brain out there?

 

[SOHEIL]

Perspective makes difference when u compare to DISTANT object, while I am comparing it to the width of runway when it is just taking off.

0:01 sec, u can see that it is located left to middle line:

View attachment 150424

0:02:

View attachment 150426

Clearly its wingspan is just little fraction of runway width (1/4 -1/5 of half runway width).

Wanna play?

 

[Serpentine]

There was/is no problem with @500's posts. @rahi2357 basically said nothing but a one statement trolling, and you gave him 1 positive rating for trolling which was pathetic as your mullah friend says. Anyway, instead of childish play games, tell me your true opinion. is it a scaled down RC model as I said or not?

You still don't get what is wrong with his post? Wow, just wow. The more amazing thing is that you @rahi2357 post as trolling. That post deserved a rating because it explained the stupidity of that post in the most simple way. I gave you the opportunity and you refused it, I will remember this moment.

My opinion? I said it earlier in very first pages, it's not clear whether it's 1:1 or a scaled down version, but I think the video is from 2 or even different versions, the ones landing and taking off are probably the smaller ones, while the one in the air may be the actual size. The IRGC guy himself said there is also a smaller version of it. All of these are speculations as long a we don't have for example a human besides it to judge on the size. All of them could be the original size or small ones.

 

[haman10]

Why they film it from the distance with camera on ground so it will look bigger and no one near so we could not see its actual size? I am still waiting for any normal footage.

ok lemme end your 2-yr-old misery

 

[SOHEIL]

1.
View attachment 150467


“Measurements taken from imagery suggests the craft is roughly the same size as the RQ-170 at 4.8 meters while the wingspan is considerably larger–when compared to open source estimates–at 16.60 meters.”


2. A runway size would be:
Length: 1800~4000 meters
Width : 45 meters


3.

View attachment 150468

Thanks but the wingspan is a bit smaller!

 

[damm1t]

People have doubts about iranian released platforms here for a reason and it's bloody easy to prevent them... Just film them in a professional way with different angles, when landing or taking off ant with materials to make a comparison next to them... and release the footage... These videos seem like filmed secretly and leaked by housekeeper... That's normal we think that iran hides something...

 

[Kiarash]

sane "people" dont have any doubts .... butt hurt "people do ....they'll always do ....even if "Iranian released platforms" drop a bomb on them they'll still talk BS.... even if Iran blow up the moon, they'll continue to B.S .....it's the nature of enemy and trolls....no "a professional way with different angles" can never solve it !!!

 

[-SINAN-]

will piss on your facts!
Patience...

No need to do that.....if i'm wrong simply refute me. I'll be glad to learn new things.

 

[SOHEIL]

No need to do that.....if i'm wrong simply refute me. I'll be glad to learn new things.

You gonna learn... (Doubt it)

 

[500]

Hey Mr.five hundred...

Your last comparison (60 cm) ended like this:

View attachment 150557

Wanna play?

ok lemme end your 2-yr-old misery

Thats what I am saying. When its on ground display they show good quality images, all the details, people stand near it. But once it starts to fly it becomes 240 p shitty video from distance and no one around.

BTW u can also see that gear of flying and standing UAVs are different.

P.S. Welcome back Soheil jan.