Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions

[TOPGUN]

Congrats Iran , make sure to give them hell

 

[tesla]

well done iran

 

[The Last of us]

well done iran

Thanks bro

 

[Militant Atheist]

1,200 tons. Which is about the size fo the smallest Type 209.

Above post as so seriously off topic that I'm pondering what to do about them.

Yeah. I was kinda interested in that.

 

[SOHEIL]

Soumar :

.
.
.

Р95-300

Разработчик: АМНТК «Союз»

Изготовитель: «Мотор Сич»

Год освоения: 1982

Применение: Х-55, Х-35, Х-59М

малоразмерные одновальные ТРДД тягой 300-380 кгс

R95-300

Developer: AESTC "Union"

The manufacturer: "Motor Sich"

Year of development: 1982

Application: X-55, X-35, X-59M

small-sized single-shaft turbofan thrust of 300-380 kg

Турбореактивные двигатели для БПЛА / Взлёт 2006 04

 

[yavar]

The Real Iran Threat (Hint: It's Not Nukes)


Why is the national debate now swirling around a prospective nuclear deal with Iran entirely missing a key point? Because it is all but ignoring a huge proverbial elephant that is not in the room but should be: Iran’s nuclear missile programs. These are part and parcel of what makes the Islamic Republic’s growing nuclear weapons infrastructure so menacing. Ignoring Iranian missiles is nothing less than an original sin of omission in the Obama administration approach to trying to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions by negotiating a comprehensive grand bargain. Far from being a peripheral problem, this lapse represents a fundamental flaw that is likely to bedevil the viability of any agreement that emerges from these negotiations.

To be sure, many other important issues regarding the so-called P5+1 (Britain, China, France, Russia, United States plus Germany) talks with Iran are now coming to the fore of public awareness. In spite of the all too predictable media fixation on a pair of recent partisan brouhahas that have flared up between the Obama administration and congressional Republicans—the invitation to Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to address Congress on the Iran talks, and then the open letter to Iran from forty-seven Republican senators stressing the constitutional limits of any agreement that is not approved by Congress—the national press deserves credit for also focusing on the actual substance of the deal that is starting to come into focus. Recent coverage has explored many arcane and interrelated issues at an impressive level of sophistication. These include the agreement’s legal status, duration, and durability, the scope of its restrictions such as the number of centrifuges allowed and disposition of existing stocks of nuclear fuel, and even highly technical aspects of the Iranian weapons program that are not covered such as neutron initiators, and fusing, arming and firing systems. For his part President Obama himself has gone out of his way to stress the importance of verification as a critical element in any agreement, although it is unclear how intrusive a process the President deems necessary or what verification mechanisms Iran may be willing to tolerate. These are all important factors that taken together will rightly shape judgments about any deal that is reached. In all of this debate and analysis, however, there is scant notice that Iran’s nuclear missile programs do not seem to be anywhere in the mix.


The Real Iran Threat (Hint: It's Not Nukes) | The National Interest

 

[B+ Dracula]

Congratulations to IRAN...

i don't know why turkey brothers make collision with iranians.

its called LOVE....my friend

 

[yavar]

FOR FOOLS

U.S. eyes Iran missile threats, boosts testing tempo

By Andrea Shalal
WASHINGTON, March 18 (Reuters) - The U.S. Missile Defense Agency, citing growing missile threats from North Korea and Iran, said on Wednesday the United States was carrying out increasingly realistic tests of its missile defenses while also beefing up cybersecurity.

MDA Director Navy Vice Admiral James Syring said North Korea has fielded hundreds of missiles that could reach U.S. forces based in South Korea and Japan, while Iran was stepping up work on more sophisticated missiles.

Both countries could achieve the ability to launch an intercontinental ballistic missile as early as this year, he told a hearing of the defense subcommittee for the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Syring said the agency was carrying out more war games and exercises to prepare for possible attacks, while increasing the tempo and complexity of its testing, reducing costs and investing in new technologies.


U.S. eyes Iran, N.Korea missile threats, boosts testing tempo | Daily Mail Online

 

[SOHEIL]

 

[yavar]

FOR FOOLS

Iran to Test Intercontinental Ballistic Missile in 2015 - US Defense Agency

The US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) has assessed that Iran will be capable of testing an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) this year, US Missile Defense Agency Director James Syring said.

WASHINGTON (Sputnik) — The US ground-based interceptors based in Fort Greely, Alaska and Vandenberg Air Force Base in California are sufficient to protect the United States homeland against “the future Iranian ICBM threat should it emerge,” Syring stated.

“The DIA’s assessment is that Iran is capable of flight-testing an ICBM in 2015,” Syring told members of the US Senate Armed Services Committee on Wednesday.
“There’s not a likelihood expressed with that assessment,” Syring said, adding that the DIA will further evaluate the likelihood of an Iranian flight test in an assessment it will conduct later in 2015.

The United States has 30 ground-based interceptors deployed on its West Coast, and will be adding an additional 14 by 2017.

The United States also has 33 Aegis warships with mobile ballistic missile defense capabilities, and will upgrade to 35 ships by the end of 2016, according to the Missile Defense Agency.

Iran to Test Intercontinental Ballistic Missile in 2015 - US Defense Agency / Sputnik International

 

[Minute by Minute]

I guess the joke is on the "photoshop" crowd!

 

[yavar]

FOR FOOLS

US test-fires intercontinental missile in California (VIDEO)
Published time: March 23, 2015 21:18

US test-fires intercontinental missile in California (VIDEO) — RT USA

 

[-------]

Soumar :

View attachment 204613

.
.
.



R95-300

Developer: AESTC "Union"

The manufacturer: "Motor Sich"

Year of development: 1982

Application: X-55, X-35, X-59M

small-sized single-shaft turbofan thrust of 300-380 kg

Турбореактивные двигатели для БПЛА / Взлёт 2006 04

Iran instead of reverse engineering, why don't you fund Turkey with an agreement of full TOT.

 

[SOHEIL]

Iran instead of reverse engineering, why don't you fund Turkey with an agreement of full TOT.

 

[Shams313]

Soheil,can u update the the page contains iranian missile list in wikipedia (list of missile by countries/iran) .there is a lot of missile remains absent.