-blitzkrieg-
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2015
- Messages
- 6,376
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
Im pretty amused and feeling pity at how you are trying to squeze 'iran' into every bit of history of the region.Iran wasnt really a national identity all this time. persian was and it was brought here by turkics..not persians...Iran/aryan people were never never a monolith.Those who went north towards Scandinavia from pontic steppes and those who went south have no connection.
Pakistanis got aryan DNA ~5000 years ago roughly around the same time Iranians got it.It has little to nothing to do with these dynasties or invasions.
Yaqub is called persian because unlike his predecessors he made persian not arabic the lingua franca of the empire all in his rift with abbasids. Sindhis/Habbaris spoke sindhi/arab not persian.PErsian was not our langauge for "centuries" It was a court language AFTER Ghaznavid invasions.
i go with the real map
Origin of pashtuns is pretty much vague it can be from either side of Pakistan or Afghanistan border.Pashtuns have their own theories of their origin and suelman mountain range(pakistan) as well.The earliest record of pashtuns was found in east arachosia present day Pakistan by the greek writer Herodotus in 450 BC ..who mentions their presence around Indus river.
Lodhis were locals..They were also locals of Multan..
Ahmed Shah abdali's tribe is from a place called toba achakzai which is on the Pakistani Pashtun side. Thats where he took his last breaths.
Pashtuns were always people of present day Pakistan.
it prove? that you are trolling and wasting our time.
Pakistanis got aryan DNA ~5000 years ago roughly around the same time Iranians got it.It has little to nothing to do with these dynasties or invasions.
Habbari dynasty (arab) ruled makran turan khuzdar and sindh during that time..there is an actual list of governors and emirs from that era none of whom was saffarids man .They formed an alliance with yaqub ayyarr the leader of saffarid..Yaqub was a baloch, his genealogy is not widely public but he was ..much closer to us than Azeris.Why ? because people of zaranj have DNA of Indus valley.Regardless of his genealogy we dont own him, his stature was very low.. so you can take him..lolSaffarid (Persian)
Yaqub is called persian because unlike his predecessors he made persian not arabic the lingua franca of the empire all in his rift with abbasids. Sindhis/Habbaris spoke sindhi/arab not persian.PErsian was not our langauge for "centuries" It was a court language AFTER Ghaznavid invasions.
Samanids never controlled baluchistan..there are different versions of that map floating on internet.
i go with the real map
Timur after reading aboveTimurid (Turko-Mongols but highly Turkified/Iranicised in culture and Language)
Turkic
Khalaj iranic ?Khalaj (Turkic or Iranic ?)
As pathan ..Suri was born an raised in bengal/bihar. Didnt even speak pashtun lingo. Culturally mughal.Hardly ruled 10-15 years through a coup.Suri (Afghan)
dude you have exposed your afghani soul with your maps..there was no afghan empire no afghanistan prior to 1820s.Lodhi (Ghilzai Afghan)
Origin of pashtuns is pretty much vague it can be from either side of Pakistan or Afghanistan border.Pashtuns have their own theories of their origin and suelman mountain range(pakistan) as well.The earliest record of pashtuns was found in east arachosia present day Pakistan by the greek writer Herodotus in 450 BC ..who mentions their presence around Indus river.
Lodhis were locals..They were also locals of Multan..
Pashtuns arent greek to Punjabis but more of a neighbors and genetically overlap . Punjab is not even ethnic group but more of a geographic identity..Mosts of the punjabis from hindkowan or those from mianwali (westernn punjab) are genetically closer to Pashtuns than to eastern punjabis. Culturally closer to east. Pashtuns (pactiyans) lived in east arachosia all the way up to indus in the earliest recorded details.And I am a slavic LOCAL man of Europe because I was born in a slavic country. wtf. Getting born in a place with foreign genetics and culture does not make one a local, esp if the man in question is a colonizing master in Ahmed Shah's case. By your theory, some 20 Greek Kings born in North India were also Indians just because their daddy's were greek rulers of North India or even better, British rulers of India who may have had children born in India must have been Indians right? Locals like their colonized race.
To differentiate between Hepthalite/Abdali/Durrani Afghans and Punjabi Pakistanis what could be better than pure genetics. How can an Iranic Afghan of Hephathalite Bactarian descent be a local in Indic subcontinent? Please explain to me when they are massively different genes.
Ahmed Shah abdali's tribe is from a place called toba achakzai which is on the Pakistani Pashtun side. Thats where he took his last breaths.
Pashtuns were always people of present day Pakistan.
dear afghani you have nothing to prove with these crumbs of territories here and there from a cherry picked time.This map would shrink when you show the time when Mughals ruled Kabul and Kandahar.What exactly doesSaffavid (Azeris majorly, Kurds, Persians, Afghans included)
it prove? that you are trolling and wasting our time.