What's new

Indian Navy Aircraft Carriers and Ships

Since we have enough money and Indian friends tell us that we are good at copy and paste,
so why not ctrl c + ctrl v + ctrl v + ctrl v + ctrl v.
Still not enough ACs to control Indian Ocean?
Fine, ctrl v + ctrl v + ctrl v + ctrl v.....

Next step, USS Gerald R. Ford, Ctrl + C
and ...
ctrl v, ctrl v, ctrl v, ctrl v...
Atleast you shouldn't talk about Ctrl + C Ctrl + V......your economy is based on it...:smokin:
 
.
2601138d0826.jpg

811f58548047.jpg

95566f433760.jpg

5cafd50a3f17.jpg

65a05ba4ee35.jpg

93322724b7dc.jpg


^^Awesome pics and video
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Dosa is regular food for southern India, while its special dish for Nothern India. I remember my childhood, we use to get excited when parent use to take us for Dosa treat. (I spent my 19 years in Notheren India_)

Now every morning I eat Dosa in breakfast.. (Stayin in bangalore since many years.)

I havent eaten Dosa for a while... i need to asap :argh:
 
. .
There is a question that many people ask.Why does India always go for other people's leftovers?To be completely honest the Russians must be laughing their *** off now.Never in their wildest dreams did they think that the Vikramaditya will actually find a buyer.How much did we spend on the carrier?$4 billlion?was it not possible for us to design, develop and fabricate a carrier on our own with that amount?
 
.
There is a question that many people ask.Why does India always go for other people's leftovers?To be completely honest the Russians must be laughing their *** off now.Never in their wildest dreams did they think that the Vikramaditya will actually find a buyer.How much did we spend on the carrier?$4 billlion?was it not possible for us to design, develop and fabricate a carrier on our own with that amount?

It's not about leftovers, but about what was available. In that time only 2nd British STOVL carriers were available as an alternative and IN wanted more capable carriers, which made the Gorshkov as the only option. Yes we are able to develop such a carrier as well, IAC1, but the idea was to have Vikramaditya already in operational service and to train pilots and crews till IAC1 will be ready. Didn't worked out as planned and there is no doubt about that Russia is the main winner of this deal, but we had no other option.
 
.
Stunning pics

AND EVEN BETTER INDIAN FLAG SHIP THE VIKRAMDITYA pride of our navy
 
.
The photo was taken by US satellite during sea trivial.

ANALYSIS CENTER
The DigitalGlobe Analysis Center collected this image of the Chinese aircraft carrier Varyag during its second sea trial in the Yellow Sea, approximately 100 kilometers south-southeast of the port of Dalian.


varyag-yellowsea-dec8_11-AC-SPOT2.jpg


Link here:
Satellite Imagery and Geospatial Information Products


So our training toy is bigger than your real one.
Can't wait to see what our real one may look like.:smitten:

China can produce EVERYTHING in an AC, so no need to beg for the Russians.
With the world's second largest economy and world's biggest ship building industry, it's just a piece of cake to build more advanced toys.



Vrayag is supercarrier while vikadi is mid size carrier. Do you know that sister ship of vikadi is in china? one was bought directly from russia, second was bought via korea. The vrayag was bouht thru ukraine. so alltogather Chian has bought 3 carriers from russia, one supercarrier, and two mid size carrier.

china must have learnt most pc the ting bout carriers, they should come up with carrier now.
 
.
Vrayag is supercarrier while vikadi is mid size carrier. Do you know that sister ship of vikadi is in china? one was bought directly from russia, second was bought via korea. The vrayag was bouht thru ukraine. so alltogather Chian has bought 3 carriers from russia, one supercarrier, and two mid size carrier.

china must have learnt most pc the ting bout carriers, they should come up with carrier now.

Varyag is not a super carrier, not by a long way. The Nimitz and Ford class are super carriers. The Kuznetzov is a mid sized carrier.
 
. .
Varyag is not a super carrier, not by a long way. The Nimitz and Ford class are super carriers. The Kuznetzov is a mid sized carrier.


Supercarrier: Supercarrier is an unofficial descriptive term for the largest type of aircraft carrier, usually displacing over 70,000 long tons : from wiki....

Forrestal displaced 60,000 tons standard and 78,000 tons in deep load[8] and is considered the first operational supercarrier in the present-day sense : from wiki

the United Kingdom building two 65,600-ton carriers Queen Elizabeth class, and France considering building one vessel, possibly based on the same design. :From wiki

The Soviet Union's 85,000-ton nuclear carrier Ulyanovsk, closely comparable in size to earlier American supercarriers, was 40% complete when it and a follow-on vessel were canceled in 1991 during post-Cold War funding cuts. :From wiki
 
.
The photo was taken by US satellite during sea trivial.

ANALYSIS CENTER
The DigitalGlobe Analysis Center collected this image of the Chinese aircraft carrier Varyag during its second sea trial in the Yellow Sea, approximately 100 kilometers south-southeast of the port of Dalian.


varyag-yellowsea-dec8_11-AC-SPOT2.jpg


Link here:
Satellite Imagery and Geospatial Information Products


So our training toy is bigger than your real one.
Can't wait to see what our real one may look like.:smitten:

China can produce EVERYTHING in an AC, so no need to beg for the Russians.
With the world's second largest economy and world's biggest ship building industry, it's just a piece of cake to build more advanced toys.
As of today, your statement is false.........
South Korea- 37.45%
China-33.7%

This is a 2011 estimate, and China's share has fallen further in 2012. China was briefly no. 1 during 2008 to 2010 due to increase in the sales of cheap small and mid sized vessels, which China majors in............However their current production is of basic vessels only ........
And if China had the capability to build a Carrier by itself, then why did it buy Varyag??

Supercarrier: Supercarrier is an unofficial descriptive term for the largest type of aircraft carrier, usually displacing over 70,000 long tons : from wiki....

Forrestal displaced 60,000 tons standard and 78,000 tons in deep load[8] and is considered the first operational supercarrier in the present-day sense : from wiki

the United Kingdom building two 65,600-ton carriers Queen Elizabeth class, and France considering building one vessel, possibly based on the same design. :From wiki

The Soviet Union's 85,000-ton nuclear carrier Ulyanovsk, closely comparable in size to earlier American supercarriers, was 40% complete when it and a follow-on vessel were canceled in 1991 during post-Cold War funding cuts. :From wiki
The reason why UK and France's carriers are considered "super", is given that their maximum loaded displacement would exceed 70,000 tons..........
Then why isn't IAC 2,i.e , INS Vishal not considered a supercarrier??after all it too fulfills the criteria this argument gives........
 
.
The reason why UK and France's carriers are considered "super", is given that their maximum loaded displacement would exceed 70,000 tons..........
Then why isn't IAC 2,i.e , INS Vishal not considered a supercarrier??after all it too fulfills the criteria this argument gives........


Vrayag is not supercarrier because its 3-4000 Tons lesser than 70,000 tons. :) Its like saying A5 is not ICBM coz its range is 200 Km lesser than required... :)


Vrayag is 300 mtr long where as US carriers are 333 mtrs long, Vrayag will 65-67000 Tonns carrier, I think its lies at boundary of definition of super carrier.. Technically its not a super carrier, But if we give some leverage, We can call it super carrier... :)


The reason why UK and France's carriers are considered "super", is given that their maximum loaded displacement would exceed 70,000 tons..........
Then why isn't IAC 2,i.e , INS Vishal not considered a supercarrier??after all it too fulfills the criteria this argument gives........


Vrayag is not supercarrier because its 3-4000 Tons lesser than 70,000 tons. :) Its like saying A5 is not ICBM coz its range is 200 Km lesser than required... :)


Vrayag is 300 mtr long where as US carriers are 333 mtrs long, Vrayag will 65-67000 Tonns carrier, I think its lies at boundary of definition of super carrier.. Technically its not a super carrier, But if we give some leverage, We can call it super carrier... :)
 
.
Vrayag is not supercarrier because its 3-4000 Tons lesser than 70,000 tons. :) Its like saying A5 is not ICBM coz its range is 200 Km lesser than required... :)


Vrayag is 300 mtr long where as US carriers are 333 mtrs long, Vrayag will 65-67000 Tonns carrier, I think its lies at boundary of definition of super carrier.. Technically its not a super carrier, But if we give some leverage, We can call it super carrier... :)





Vrayag is not supercarrier because its 3-4000 Tons lesser than 70,000 tons. :) Its like saying A5 is not ICBM coz its range is 200 Km lesser than required... :)


Vrayag is 300 mtr long where as US carriers are 333 mtrs long, Vrayag will 65-67000 Tonns carrier, I think its lies at boundary of definition of super carrier.. Technically its not a super carrier, But if we give some leverage, We can call it super carrier... :)

Then the Nimitz and Ford class are super super carriers. They are over 1,00,000 tons!
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom