Pajeets and selective amnesia. Name a more iconic duo.
Indian superiority over the IOR is contrary to the US, China, Europe, and Pakistan's interest. Do you really want the interests of these countries to align against yours?
It is naive to think that uttering a word makes one either powerful or weak. Countries with mature foreign policy know these things.
India does not have a "mature" foreign policy. The Balakot war mongering and the meekness of Galwan are both freshly ingrained in the world's minds.
It's clear you have no understanding of Pakistani politics and it's best you avoid commenting on the matter to save yourself the embarrassment.
Indian superiority in IOR aligns with US and European interests. Because we don’t have a conflict with them. This would also counter China, which is a big concern for them.
"India isn't a threat to them" and "Indian superiority" in IOR are contradictory.
Balakot was perfect strategic move. It gave clear signals to your establishment about Indian intentions in the future. The message was received loud and clear. Most major powers were aligned with it and accepted Indian move as a legitimate one. You wouldn’t accpet it and get down to who shot whom and how Abhi was served tea. That’s the difference between understanding of strategic and tactical aspects.
Just because India is superior doesn’t mean that it becomes a threat to the West. That’s the difference between responsible nations and hegemons. Example - China.
Words marked and noted. But disagreed with. Your assessment is based on your own experience which is based on poor strategic thinking. Paksiatn is a good example of what not to do.
Balakot has not only ruined India's credibility in the eyes of the international community, but also emboldened Pakistan to use disproportionate, retaliatory, offensive, conventional force against India, in addition to validating Pakistan's nuclear posture.
Oh yes, I remember those "boycott China" shirts which were made in China...
India wants to be a hegemon over South Asia and the IOR, something widely acknowledged by historians, analysts, and scholars.
That contradicts what you and other Indians here have said about India having naval superiority over the IOR. I'm glad you've at least sobered up.
No, it is based on the US's experience. You will see what I mean.
And where was it tested?
I have been to Kashmir few times after that. Last year number of tourists that came to Kashmir was more than total tourist trade in entire Paksiatn. Good luck with your theories.
Again a childish line of argument. It is better to keep quite than engage in such childish retorts.
Not before it leaves Karachi & Gwadar up in smokes.
On your Brigade HQ where your COAS was sitting...
Do I really need to post pictures of these attacks to get my point across? You can create a facade of normalcy to delude yourself with, but the ground reality remains the same.
"Do not talk about China and India in the same breath" -Lee Kuan Yew
Are you one of those who keep getting happy over the targeting video of the headquarters? You have still not understood the significance of the strike by India. It was not about Indian bombs falling on that building or on trees or open fields. It was a strategic shift in Indian position over material support by Paksiatn to militancy in Kashmir. That was very clear. Most posters get mired in minor aspects and refuse to see this shift, which was the biggest outcome.
lee kaun may be your god, not ours.
Anyone can post any number of pictures and claim anything. I can also post pictures of attack by TTP and BLA and claim total anarchy.
Now you are the spokesperson of the US?
Do you have anything else to discuss which is related to the topic and keep your offtopic trolling in some other thread?
Why does the US costs so much money on building aircraft carriers? Why don't Americans save money to repay $40 trillion in foreign debt?Why is China building aircraft carriers when it costs so much money? Lol why not use the money on development and use it to bail out those huge property developers who have gone bankrupt?
See what I did there?
Boycott China? Well. I remember.
www.google.com
www.google.com
