What's new

India’s illegal occupation of independent Sikkim has to be reversed

Let me rephrase: If BD doesn't bow to Indian demands, then India will cut off BD'd water supply.

Indian bullying on display, yet again.

India don't want terrorism and illegal migration in India and if so, yes we will need to rethink.

We have maintain water treaty with you since many years but still you keep sending terrorist. So, it's fair for India to keep silent. There has to be end.
 
.
... But alas, we in India, merely follow the old democratic tradition of free and fair elections.

...

Free and fair election? Let's see how the clown dances nakedly in front of the whole world.

1) From the beginning to the end of this drama, India threatened Sikkim Royal family and politicians, blatantly interfered Sikkim’s internal affaires:

India openly supported the movement against King (Chogyal) Palden Thondup Namgyal. The then ADC to the King, Captain Sonam Yongda, claimed that soldiers of Indian Army in civil dress used to take part in the protests. Some of the protesters were brought from Darjeeling and the surrounding areas. The number of Sikkimese who took part in the protest was quite small.

Lhendup’s protest movement depended mainly on Indian financial assistance. The money was made available through Intelligence Bureau (IB).
…

Raina writes that New Delhi had taken the decision to annex Sikkim in 1971, and that the RAW used the next two years to create the right conditions within Sikkim to make that happen. The key here was to use the predominantly-Hindu Sikkimese of Nepali origin

2) Your 97% vote is a rigging-referendum. Sikkimese were threatened with rifles. It is a farce in front of the whole world.

the referendum was nothing but a charade. “Indian soldiers rigged the polls by pointing rifles at the hapless voters,”
…

Needless to say that the entire episode was being orchestrated by India .

3) Sikkim’s annex by India is through illegal, blatant invasion by Indian military troops.

There were Indian soldiers everywhere, they had surrounded the palace, and short rapid bursts of machine gun fire could be heard. Basanta Kumar Chhetri, a 19-year-old guard at the palace’s main gate, was struck by a bullet and killed—the first casualty of the takeover. The 5,000-strong Indian force didn’t take more than 30 minutes to subdue the palace guards who numbered only 243.

It is "alas", but call this free, fair? :rofl: :flame:

Really hope at that time, or perhaps in the future, PLA soldiers would/will chop off Indian pawns heads freely and fairly, to restore a great country called Sikkim in SA.
 
. .
Free and fair election? Let's see how the clown dances nakedly in front of the whole world.

1) From the beginning to the end of this drama, India threatened Sikkim Royal family and politicians, blatantly interfered Sikkim’s internal affaires:



2) Your 97% vote is a rigging-referendum. Sikkimese were threatened with rifles. It is a farce in front of the whole world.

.

Yeah and you were there to watch all of it werent ya, why dont you share the tale with the world...because nobody including china disputes sikkim...just some toons like you.

3) Sikkim’s annex by India is through illegal, blatant invasion by Indian military troops..

Any proof for those heavy words of yours....any support in the International community...the UN saying something abiout it maybe...

It is "alas", but call this free, fair? :rofl: :flame:

Really hope at that time, or perhaps in the future, PLA soldiers would/will chop off Indian pawns heads freely and fairly, to restore a great country called Sikkim in SA.

Last time I heard it was the mighty PLA soldiers who got their heads chopped off by an Indian soldier....you do remember it a single injured Indian soldier chopped off five chinese PLA's
 
.
Last time I heard it was the mighty PLA soldiers who got their heads chopped off by an Indian soldier....you do remember it a single injured Indian soldier chopped off five chinese PLA's

Looks like now a days afghans are supplying too much drugs to indians. indians are in Chinese killing spree, in dream off course.

Sino-Indian War
Official military casualty figures for India, as confirmed by the Indian government, stand at 3,128 killed, 3,123 captured, and 1,697 wounded
Sino-Indian War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
.
Looks like now a days afghans are supplying too much drugs to indians. indians are in Chinese killing spree, in dream off course.


.
A day earlier, there had been a minor scuffle between the Sikh sentries of the 10 J&K Rifles and their Chinese counterparts on a flat patch of icy land of about 5 meters on the unmarked boundary. It had a boulder about 30 cm in height in the center of the narrow crest which marked the dividing line, according to the waterseed principle. Three Indians and an equal number of Chinese sentries were positioned on either side of the boulder, 2 metres from each other. During the fisticuffs, a Chinese sentry was roughed up and he lost a tunic button. The Chinese were thus smarting under a temporary reverse. This fact came to Major K.B. Joshi (Battalion CO 7/11 GR) much later. Having reached Twin huts by September 30, the two companies occupied forward positions by October 1. Major Joshi informed Lt. Rathore that he was on his way to Point 15450 and would be there by 0930 hours on October 1.

Fighting Starts

Major Joshi reached Rai Gap on the way to D Coy positions by 0915 hours. The sentry post at Pt. 15450 was visible from there. Just then he observed that the post was being surrounded by a section strength of Chinese troops. A second section was seen circumventing the D Coy platoon position along the northern cliff in a single file. Major Joshi at once informed Lt. Rathore of what he had seen. The later informed Major Joshi that the Chinese Coy Cdr. and the political commissar were staking claims to the boulder at the sentry post. Naib Subedar Gyan Bahadur Limbu was having a heated argument with his counterpart at the sentry post during which he rested his right foot on the boulder under dispute. The Chinese kicked his foot away. Gyan put his foot back and challenged them. Events were moving quickly.

By this time the Chinese had taken up position, presumably because their commander had already taken a decision to escalate the incident. And one of the Chinese sentries bayoneted Gyan wounding him in the arm. The Gorkha's response was swift. Both arms of the Chinese who hit the JCO were chopped off with a Khukri. At this point the Chinese opened fire and the two sides engaged in a firefight at close range. Lance Naik Krishna Bahadur, the Post Cdr., then led a charge against the Chinese in the vicinity who were forming up for an assault. Although hit & incapacitated, he continued to harangue his men forward. Rifleman Devi Prasad Limbu directly behind his Post Cdr. was already engaged in a close quarter battle with the enemy and his Khukri took off five Chinese heads.
.

try reading more than speaking...it'll help...

Poor chinese didnt even retaliate....instead returned Limbu's body with a commendation....Obviously India wasnt the same as '62 and chinese realized it.
 
.
.

try reading more than speaking...it'll help...

Poor chinese didnt even retaliate....instead returned Limbu's body with a commendation....Obviously India wasnt the same as '62 and chinese realized it.

First ,you dont have any link for your story much less any independent outside indian source for your "story".

Second, indian army famous for cooked bravado for commendation but later found to be utter lie.

Third, fact remains india illegally occupied Sikkim so own up to your occupier title. There is no glorification in that.
 
.
India lost the war and not like you who gifted just to make sure China does not clean Pakistan. without As you mention about war, Pakistan will loose war against India. Happy.. ?

Try to get the point peace.
Pakistan is still standing.
What war Indian won expect propaganda?
 
.
what india won??
became the largest democracy in the world..
amongst the fastest growing economy in the world ...
the regional superpower...
on the anvil of becoming great powers...

wish you could know it
lets see what you achieved..

almost half the time spent under military dictator..

democratic government run by "bu*fo0ns "(just quoting a pakistani member)

about economy.........its better to talk about weather

superpower??? (just thinking about the position of the country amongst thge faile state)

lets see after 60 years of independence who has faired better??


just start thinking from thy head not from thy heart
 
.
Try to get the point peace.
Pakistan is still standing.
What war Indian won expect propaganda?

Sorry brother, you will shock that India won 1965, 1971 and 1999. If you analysis the war neutrally you will come to know that Pakistan would not have been able to survive if war would have been continue. Pakistan still standing because of Nukes, India still standing against China because of Nuke.
 
.
Sorry brother, you will shock that India won 1965, 1971 and 1999. If you analysis the war neutrally you will come to know that Pakistan would not have been able to survive if war would have been continue. Pakistan still standing because of Nukes, India still standing against China because of Nuke.

1965 and 1999 war Indian can n t clam military victory.
 
. .
IN your terms what victory is? or what will the victory?

Allow me. Victory well means achieving of objectives even if that means achieving certain objectives like in kargil Pakistan's objective was to highlight the kashmir issue and the importence of it conveying the world that it could become a nuclear flash point if the dispute isnt resvoled between two nuclear armed states.
In literal sense 65, 99 India cannot claim a victory over Pakistan's loss because both sides claim to achieve victories capturing enemy territory, human loss etc etc even shooting down of jets. The only victory India ever scored and a decisive one against Pakistan was 71.

In the end we can all agree to disagree.
 
. .
India had to call in Israeli AF to help fight Pakistan in 1999
How surprising, the champion of Arabs and Palestinian cause, India had to seek help from Israel in the Kargil war. Probably, the help it was seeking was to get the GPS positions of Pakistani troops on mountain tops, so that it can pound its howitzer fires on those targets. Or was it direct participation by the Israeli AF? Can someone explain the matter.

Anyway, we are a bit away from Sikkim. In Sikkim, India just walked in and occupied that land.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom