American Pakistani
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 30, 2010
- Messages
- 15,374
- Reaction score
- 10
- Country
- Location
And do you still follow that great civilization.
It's like asking Egyptians if they still follow Firauns. lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And do you still follow that great civilization.
lolzz .. since when you have any history?? no existence before 1947. We are talking about thousands of years of friendship betweentwo greatest civilisations of the world India and Iran. You have no say. May be borrow something from Arabs or Turks
Mr fool you are not talking about your ganga civilization. You people only brag about Indus/Sind/Sindhu civilization which is Sindh's. You seems like a brain washed product coming out of Indian Propaganda Army machine.
Again lolzz .. its all Hindu civilisation, great Indian history.
Hindutva read again, that wiki page is filled by Bhartis like you. Persian empires mostly had relations with punjabis and Sindhis.
Pashtuns & baloch are Iranic people anyway.
So called "India" history is just a short term invented by British. Unfortunately for many Bhartis here, maharashtra, biharis, tamils, keralais, begalis, south indians etc didnt have any relation with pre-Islamic Iran no matter how desperate you get to prove otherwise.
Just enjoy the Indian comedy.
In front of Iranians, the Indians talk of Persian "relations".
Behind the Iranians' back, they talk of Persian "invasions".
Middle Eastern people in general -- both Arabs and Iranians -- are still mired in their old racial prejudices.
If the Iranians were smart, they would have formed a solid alliance with China. Nothing would give a bigger heartburn to the Arabs and their American protectors than a major Chinese navy base in the Persian Gulf.
What makes you think why Chinese never persued such a route than choosing Pakistan?
You didnt answer my question, what stopped you all these years to make progress on II pipeline?
Chinese are open to making friends/allies everywhere.
The problem, as I mentioned, is that most people in the Middle East are still mired in old racial stereotypes. They still haven't wrapped their minds around the upcoming world order.
Any fool can see change when it happens; the smart man is the one who can foresee it before it happens.
Mr Victim of Indian army propaganda, honestly speaking Sindh is baap of whole Subcontinent(excluding Balochistan & KPK) & it's history is almost 8000 years old. The name of Bharat too belongs to Sindh & your religion too. Learn the facts before f@rting.
For the bold part, there is a reason the world doesnt want to choose that upcoming world order simply because the papa is still standing strong, no matter how weak we feel he is. There has been a reason, why US is still regarded in establishing this order. The Chinese in many ways are yet to become, and just by building the biggest or the largest doesnt make them one.
The recent visit of Chinese Foreign minister, suggests that Chinese have increased the focus on middle east, and the reason apparently is one. their appetite for oil. China didnt persue such a route earlier and why it didnt do such was my question to you.
Pure geography.
Pakistan provides the single direct route to the Indian ocean. Other routes go through several countries (CARs) or deeply troubled regions (Afghanistan).
There is no doubt that the US will remain the single most dominant power for most of this century. The new world order is about the fact that the era of unchallenged hegemony will end and there will be room for compromise and negotiation.
They run away when i asked them to prove so callec ancient Persian relations with tamils, biharis and dozens of statest in India. At best they will come say they are talking about before 1947 when British conquered whole South Asia for 100 years. Here is the thing, now we are in 2013 and decendents of people who had relations with pre islamic Persia live in Pakistan.
History goes with its people and land, Tamils cant claim to have any relations with Persia.
What conspiracy? Why Bhartis get defensive when it comes to real history? I mean how desperate one can get to prove that Indians were closer to pre-islamic persia then pashtuns, baloch, punjabis and sindhis? These 4 ethnicities make 2% at best of Indian population but 90% of Pakistan's. Typical inferiority complex shown by Bhartis here.
And Pakistan region was part of Maurya empire for 70 years. Lets compare that to Persian empire Achaemenid Empire 220 years. Seriously Bhartis stop playing with history.