What's new

India has NEVER been a unified entity.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I showed you the authentic map, it seems your skyrocketing high IQ can't comprehend it. :omghaha:

If ONE simple map ( incorrect one actually) can capture the transition of historical events that is thousand of years, why read history book? Why go school? :coffee:
 
That was just one of the battles.

Why don't you google it that how Unionist initially stayed away from Pakistan movement.

lmao @ ur iq level... google the effects of this battle.. 
Drag your arse outa ur madarssa and go to a proper school :lol:

Whats with indians and madrassas? huh? and by the ways... hows ur priest doing...








Altar boys.. :rofl: 
@Aeronaut why not post a map of Mauryan empire which consists of India, Pakistan and Afghanistan and say India, India was divided based on foreign faith.

Maurya_Dynasty_in_265_BCE.jpg

LMAO.. so a foriegn invasion tht happened like a billion years ago ... and lasted a very small time.. somehow shows united india? lmao..
 
@Aeronaut why not post a map of Mauryan empire which consists of India, Pakistan and Afghanistan and say India, India was divided based on foreign faith.

Maurya_Dynasty_in_265_BCE.jpg

Maurya is not called India, is it? Two, Maurya only lasted 130 years, is your history so short? What happened to the rest of the period? They were all different kingdoms with respective kings. You were never one country until British created you in 1947.
 
Maurya is not called India, is it? Two, Maurya only lasted 130 years, is your history so short? What happened to the rest of the period? They were all different kingdoms with respective kings. You were never one country until British created you in 1947.

Ah ...... a chinese trying to teach a history to Indian ......... :lol:

You better stop ranting here with concentrate on increasing post count of your some where else. 130 years are more this place existed as a unified country and the civilization is same through out the geographic area. There are no rules for a region to exist as a single country, when there is a strong central power anything is possible.

Chinese also divided into different kingdoms even after unification done by first emperor.

I am not interested in listening your poor logic rants here.
 
Ah ...... a chinese trying to teach a history to Indian ......... :lol:

You better stop ranting here with concentrate on increasing post count of your some where else. 130 years are more this place existed as a unified country and the civilization is same through out the geographic area. There are no rules for a region to exist as a single country, when there is a strong central power anything is possible.

Chinese also divided into different kingdoms even after unification done by first emperor.

I am not interested in listening your poor logic rants here.

Hans don't share anything culturally with non-Hans, the 56 ethnic minorities of China. Hans just occupied their land. In 1850s Hans were depriving Miaos from their ancestral homeland, 70% of Miao fled their homes.
 
Maurya is not called India, is it? Two, Maurya only lasted 130 years, is your history so short? What happened to the rest of the period? They were all different kingdoms with respective kings. You were never one country until British created you in 1947.

They called it Bharat too. Chankaya the teacher of Maurya, his idea was to unite entire India under one leadership and inspired Chandragupta.
 
Sub-continent was not one nation in past nor is now, And stop referring Greeks they didn't knew geography of sub-continent, even Alexandr didn't knew it, his army got thrashed (i am sure elephant cavalries was also surprise for him) and he ran back from frontier and these frontier kingdoms was just start of sub-continent and they claim that they conquered India.
 
Hans don't share anything culturally with non-Hans, the 56 ethnic minorities of China. Hans just occupied their land. In 1850s Hans were depriving Miaos from their ancestral homeland, 70% of Miao fled their homes.

These guys rely on false hannization theory, there is a full continent living in China.

Southern cantonese do not know northern Madarin and vice versa.

Each region is divided based on culture and ethinic base, like Manchu,Hakka, Ughyre, Tibet etc....etc..., These 50 cent guys come here to teach us about existence of a country ....... :lol:
 
These guys rely on false hannization theory, there is a full continent living in China.

Southern cantonese do not know northern Madarin and vice versa.

Each region is divided based on culture and ethinic base, like Manchu,Hakka, Ughyre, Tibet etc....etc..., These 50 cent guys come here to teach us about existence of a country ....... :lol:

The western half of China came with contacts of Hans only in 18th century when the Manchus(non-Hans) conquered those land into China. When Manchus were deprived of their Throne in 1912 by ROC, the last Qing Emperor tried to grab Manchuria with the help of Japanese and even got it as Manchukuo.
 
pakistan was always a single entity until India slapped in into two . Wahahhahaha
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom