What's new

HISTORY: India’s LCA Makes 1st Landing On Aircraft Carrier Deck

The Ronin

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 24, 2017
Messages
3,386
Reaction score
0
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
81687984_2757608517611087_6449368023189946368_o.jpg



Making it the first homegrown aircraft to land on an aircraft carrier deck, a prototype of the naval Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) ‘trapped’ on the Indian Navy’s sole aircraft carrier INS Vikramaditya today out in the Arabian Sea. Hailed as a major milestone, the Indian Navy has declared, ‘With this feat, the indigenously developed niche technologies specific to deck based fighter operations have been proven, which will now pave the way to develop and manufacture the Twin Engine Deck Based Fighter for the Indian Navy.’

The historic sortie was commanded by Commodore Jaideep Maolankar, who heads the N-LCA flight test. The flight marks a milestone in a journey that has been beset with odds at virtually every level.

The debut arrested landing on INS Vikramaditya’s deck took place during a pre-scheduled operational deployment of the aircraft carrier group in the Arabian Sea, and comes four months after the N-LCA test team conducted a first full launch and recovery from the shore-based ski jump test facility at the INS Hansa air station in Goa. Arrested night landings were conducted in September last year, with the the test team quickly becoming focused on achieving a deck landing before long. That it took four months to get there will be a huge confidence boost to a team that, ironically, faces giving up the N-LCA platform entirely.

‘This is great news! Cmde Maolankar & the whole ADA team have made us proud by proving the Tejas on a carrier’s deck. The navy’s 25-year old dream has come true & its faith in ADA justified,’ said Admiral Arun Prakash (Retd.), former Indian Navy chief and a veteran aviator himself (Listen to our podcast with the Admiral here).

As Livefist recently reported, the Indian Navy has put a hard stop to the possibility of the single engine N-LCA ever becoming an operational aircraft in naval service, making it official that it will only commission a twin engine fighter platform. Despite misgivings and reservations within the DRDO that administers the LCA project, the latter has now proposed a twin-engine evolution of the Tejas to meet requirements. Designated the Twin Engine Deck Based Fighter (TEDBF), the DRDO has laid down a six-year timeframe to first prototype flight.

ENglpJ-U0AIp29M.jpeg


Unlike the Indian Air Force’s largely troubled relationship with the LCA Tejas, the Indian Navy has been committed and supportive of the program through its life. It was in 2016, thirteen years after the project began, that the Indian Navy decided it needed a more powerful and capable aircraft for flight deck operations. The platform was also the centre of a factional spat that spilt out into the open from within the navy.

The N-LCA deck landing today will also, therefore, be a huge emotional moment. The navalised version of the LCA was something of an afterthought, with the project being commissioned in 2003, two years after the first air force prototype made its debut flight. Nevertheless, a singularly committed Indian Navy has ensured that the program quickly put together a credible deck-based jet with technologies developed in-house for the first time, including control laws, a finely tuned flight control system, a strengthened undercarriage for deck landings (helped by a consultancy with Airbus) and aerodynamics that suited tactical deck ops.

The Indian Navy has also laid preliminary groundwork for 57 future deck-based fighter aircraft for its future flat-top CATOBAR aircraft carriers, a prospective contest widely seen to be a face-off between the French Rafale and U.S F/A-18 Super Hornet. Whether the path to that contest and beyond stands queered by the emergence of the TEDBF program remains a matter of speculation even the navy isn’t fully clear about. Expect to hear more from this front soon.

Meanwhile, we’ll update this piece with photos and videos from the arrested deck landing when they’re in.

https://www.livefistdefence.com/202...kes-1st-landing-on-aircraft-carrier-deck.html
 
Last edited:
.
Many in PDF has flawed understanding of LCA project ...
whole new eco system of various feeder aero private industries has been built and at same time offset clauses are adding more tech.

LCA is on a much more robust path than JF-17...
 
.
LCA is on a much more robust path than JF-17...
Okay, just because it (now) lands on an Aircraft Carrier & (mostly) because you said so..., we'll take your word for it.

But let it get out in the field, first. Glorifying a jet that hasn't proved anything to date isn't worth our attention.
 
. .
Indigenous products FTW.
We need to wean out of foreign products from USA, Russia, Israel and China. Look at how China has grown out of Russian dependency in defence products, although they still buy some Russian products simply cos it’s the best and most modern out there.
 
.
Many in PDF has flawed understanding of LCA project ...
whole new eco system of various feeder aero private industries has been built and at same time offset clauses are adding more tech.

LCA is on a much more robust path than JF-17...

It's been decades,, we understand it


Is the Indian navy going to induct naval LCA now?
If the answer is what I think it is then both PDF and Indian navy are on the same page
 
.
Many in PDF has flawed understanding of LCA project ...
whole new eco system of various feeder aero private industries has been built and at same time offset clauses are adding more tech.

LCA is on a much more robust path than JF-17...

Quite contrary, you seemed to have a flawed understanding of the JF-17. Not only did it achieve its project objectives for PAF as replacement for legacy fighters, it has accelerated Pakistan's aviation manufacturing by leaps to a point that Pakistan has gradually increased its share of manufacturing to 58% of the JF-17.

Difference is being state owned PAC chose realistic and less risky path to use off the shelf technologies with TOTs and gradually improved JF-17 once better alternatives available. Private sector involved but only for components, PAC builds most of the assemblies it self. Building capacity to a point that we now have a project for a 5th Gen Azm where at least the subsystems can be Pakistan origin.

Had it been just a technology demonstrator only then just creating local know how would have been acceptable but the Teja's primary objective was to be a platform that could enter service in large numbers and replace existing fighters.
 
Last edited:
.
Quite contrary, you seemed to have a flawed understanding of the JF-17. Not only did it achieve its project objectives for PAF as replacement for legacy fighters, it has accelerated Pakistan's aviation manufacturing by leaps to a point that Pakistan has gradually increased its share of manufacturing to 58% of the JF-17.

Difference is being state owned PAC chose realistic and less risky path to use off the shelf technologies with TOTs and gradually improved JF-17 once better alternatives available. Building capacity to a point that we now have a project for a 5th Gen Azm where at least the subsystems can be Pakistan origin.

More than that, if the LCA was actually Indian you could say fine

But it's full of foreign parts from American engines, to Israeli hardware, Europeanparts

All bolted together in India


I think the navy had already rejected the plans and if it wasn't for a political intervention so would have the airforce

A point comes when the Indians have to admit they fcuked this LCA project up badly
 
.
Navy doesn't want any single engine fighters for its carriers so it will be merely a test bed or technology demonstrator for the development of twin engine fighters.

yo
More than that, if the LCA was actually Indian you could say fine

But it's full of foreign parts from American engines, to Israeli hardware, Europeanparts

All bolted together in India


I think the navy had already rejected the plans and if it wasn't for a political intervention so would have the airforce

A point comes when the Indians have to admit they fcuked this LCA project up badly

you Pakistanis can assume whatever you like but you still don't have any idea about the Indian tenacity and perseverance.
 
.
you Pakistanis can assume whatever you like but you still don't have any idea about the Indian tenacity and perseverance.

We are just repeating what your navy and airforce are saying

10 years ago I'm sure they were as excited as you
 
.
We are just repeating what your navy and airforce are saying

10 years ago I'm sure they were as excited as you

you don't need to, we know what they said exactly and what will be our future course of action. rather focus on your own country.
 
.
Indigenous products FTW.
We need to wean out of foreign products from USA, Russia, Israel and China. Look at how China has grown out of Russian dependency in defence products, although they still buy some Russian products simply cos it’s the best and most modern out there.
Since when is tejas indigneous? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
Maybe the screws might be indians

you don't need to, we know what they said exactly and what will be our future course of action. rather focus on your own country.
Focus on your own forum
 
.
Yet Indian Navy or Indian Air force don't want Teja in the fleet.

Almost 4 decades still can't satisfy their own Navy and air force

o_Oo_Oo_Oo_O
 
. . .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom