PureAryan
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2010
- Messages
- 393
- Reaction score
- 0
WHO WANTS TO BE A PAKISTANI INDIAN !??? RAISE UR HANDS!
Jokin
Not!
We just want our kashmir Back then we want nothing to do with Bharat
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WHO WANTS TO BE A PAKISTANI INDIAN !??? RAISE UR HANDS!
Jokin
Not!
New Recruit
We just want our kashmir Back then we want nothing to do with Bharat
New Recruit
and here is the extent of Iranian tribes
Also you might want to check this article about Iranian peoples :-
Iranian peoples - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I dont agree that Pakhtuns are related to Persians, it's just a linguistic classification. Just like Hazaras are Iranic too by language but ethnically they are Turko-Mongol.
...
And the correct name for the languages are Iranic and Indo-Aryan not Iranian and Indian.
Indo-Iranian is a subgroup of Indo-European (which you're calling Indo-Aryan apparently), of which Iranian is a subgroup. Kurdish for example, is an Iranian language. It's difficult sometimes to tell where to put the line between the Indic and the Iranian groups, Urdu for example sits right on that line, and Marathi is decidedly Indic, though both are Indo-European.
Actually it is Iranic. Iranic and Indic are subgroups of Indo-European languages as you pointed out.
"The term Hinduism ... [ was ] introduced in about 1830 AD by
British writers. " [Encyclopedia Britannica, 20 `Hinduism' 519 ]
"The term Hindu was first imposed on south Asian nations by the
dynasty of Ghori in the 12th century; this term was never
used in south Asia prior to the Muslim era and is not even found in
early (pre-12th century AD) Brahmanical or Buddhist texts. Such a
term and concept has no historical depth in any social, religious,
ethnic or national sense past the 12th century when Mohammed Ghori
for the first time named his conquered subjects Hindus." [G. Singh,
Sakasthan and India, Toronto, 1999, p. 20]
"Hinduism, as a faith, is vague, amorphous, many-sided, all things
to all men. It is hardly possible to define it, or indeed to say
definitely whether it is a religion or not, in the usual sense of
the word." [Jawaharlal Nehru, The Discovery of India, New Delhi,
1983, p.75]
"Frankly speaking, it is not possible to say definitely who is a
Hindu and what Hinduism is. These questions have been considered
again and again by eminent scholars, and so far no satisfactory
answer has been given." [Swami Dharma Theertha, History of Hindu
Imperialism, Madras, 1992, p. 178]
"Hinduism defies definition... It has no specific creed." [Khushwant
Singh, India: An Introduction, New Delhi, 1990, p. 19]
"The more Hinduism is considered, the more difficult it becomes to
define it in a single phrase... A Hindu may have any religious
belief or none." [Percival Spear, India: A Modern History, Michigan,
1961, p.40]
New Recruit
Another thing for those Pakistanis who say we're the same people. those guys are mohajirs who came from gujrat, calcutta, utter pradesh and other places.
These pro-Indian clowns im talking about are Pervez Hoodboy or farukh saleem ahed rashid irfan husain
Another thing for those Pakistanis who say we're the same people. those guys are mohajirs who came from gujrat, calcutta, utter pradesh and other places.
These pro-Indian clowns im talking about are Pervez Hoodboy or farukh saleem ahed rashid irfan husain
New Recruit