Kyusuibu Honbu
BANNED
- Joined
- May 21, 2010
- Messages
- 15,305
- Reaction score
- -21
- Country
- Location
There is difference between roles of nuclear AC and regular fuel ACs.AC are for power projection and stick diplomacy . Just imagine the other we will have with 2/3 AC ? That matters . By 2030 Indian navy will have more powerful and newest aub fleet in Asia . . . İndian Armed Forces will be on par with western armed forces by 2030 along with man power we have . Our ambition will decide course of the future . . . We could be very powerful with larger economy and larger armed forces for long haul which lots of countries can't afford . That's the deal . Even today we have entire warheads capable of more than 500 -800 warheads at any given time aimed at Pakistan and China but what you will hear is some midget numbers like 80-100 some . Our plutonium reserves already made sufficient for Warhead even in 2005 -06 . Now only God and RAW IB knows what would be the quantity ! ! ! China may keep shouting out but Chinese themselves knew what India says is not all . As a soft power image she will always under play and keep some heavy surprises at times of war . Pakistan is way off the course against us . Next major war will cost then heavy . Any war with China will inflict huge blow on either side . Is China ready for war some waste land in arncahal ? ? ? And Loos it's reseveres for it when it faces huge / threat from all other s in the region ? SCS ?
Nuclear ACs make sense for nations like USA which wish to project power all over the planet.
For India however our security architecture is limited to Indian Ocean, hence conventional AC make more sense.