What's new

China should shed expansionist mindset: Modi

If you are what as you claim, why your whole country crying foul about China bullying, do something and show your strength, we will see what happen next. Talk is cheap.At least you can send your troop 20 miles behind our border, see what will happen?

Yes we did, when we found your tents within our territory. Your media did not report. May be because the CCP doesn't want to loose the image of being the big bad dog, otherwise the restless and suppressed non-HANS will sense the weakness and things will take turn for worse.

We do not need US to defend us. Our armed forces are capable enough. We defended Sikkim against the blood thirstly hoards of the HAN PLA in 1967, please ask CCP to release the casualty figures, we killed more than 300 low lives.
 
Yes we did, when we found your tents within our territory. Your media did not report. May be because the CCP doesn't want to loose the image of being the big bad dog, otherwise the restless and suppressed non-HANS will sense the weakness and things will take turn for worse.

We do not need US to defend us. Our armed forces are capable enough. We defended Sikkim against the blood thirstly hoards of the HAN PLA in 1967, please ask CCP to release the casualty figures, we killed more than 300 low lives.

We do not report? where is your claim come from? self-delusion? there is just a smll report aoubt it because nobody think it is a big deal. Our people only cry our government too soft on India.

release what, release the number coming up from your delusion, do not make me laugh
 
We do not report? where is your claim come from? self-delusion? there is just a smll report aoubt it because nobody think it is a big deal. Our people only cry our government too soft on India.

release what, release the number coming up from your delusion, do not make me laugh

Whatever........o_O
 
Tibet was functioning as an independent state? whatever it is, it was part of Qing, at acient time, the power who are stronger will expanded its territory, that's natural, Yeah, Qing is a very brutal dynasty as the standard now, more brutal than Britain, I accept that, but can this decide South Tibet should be indian?
The history obviously show that, Tibet belong to Qing, Britain want south Tibet, ROC throw down Qing, CCP Kick ROC out of power in mainland, Qing, ROC and CCP have never accept the pact between Tibet religious leader and Britain, then you indian got the power again, you hope inherit the fruit that Britain cuted from Qing by force.
In 1962, China PLA kick you sucking indian out of South Tibet, for peace and goodwill, China voluntarily retreat back, and return the weapon and prisoner of war to india, after that you occupied the land audaciously, obviously, you are a greedy and coward heres,:tdown:



Even knew it, so can say the pact between Tibet and Britain is legal without the permission from center? and it is not you coward indian business.
illegal is illegal, China have never accept, before, China have sign many humiliating pact, lose huge land, especially with Russia, now, we all accept that, but as to South Tibet, it is not accepted, First it is not accept by the center government of China in power, Qing, ROC, CCP, Second, you are indian, not British, you don't have qualification, Third, you are our loser, be defeated by PLA, easily!

Qing Dynasty in 1911 wanted to send a military expedition to reintegrate Tibet under central government but Qing fell and it wasn't until 1950 that Tibet came under China's central government.

You can think anything how British got them but legally we own them because there was the transfer of those territory to india after British negotiated power transfer with Indian and Pakistani leader. Arunachal is not the land of Han and Arunachalis share nothing in common with Chinese people, so its our land.

Stop using the fake term mercy, China retreated because of their own problems.
 
Last edited:
Yes we did, when we found your tents within our territory. Your media did not report. May be because the CCP doesn't want to loose the image of being the big bad dog, otherwise the restless and suppressed non-HANS will sense the weakness and things will take turn for worse.

We do not need US to defend us. Our armed forces are capable enough. We defended Sikkim against the blood thirstly hoards of the HAN PLA in 1967, please ask CCP to release the casualty figures, we killed more than 300 low lives.

First of all, there's less than 10% minorities, second, less than 3% of those are people who actually looks a tad different and speaks a different language more or less. Don't talk about things that you know nothing of. Third, China has is doing great, if China is considered doing horrible than what's India half dead?

Don't disrespect soldiers, if you want to do that in 1962 we slaughtered more than 1,200, with further missing and captured some 3000, you really want to play this game with us?

1967 is an isolated and small incident, I'm sure if you isolate events, some days even the Taliban has killed more American soldiers, does this mean Taliban superiority or victory?

I'm not sure how similar cricket is to Baseball, but in baseball, sample size is key, batting average doesn't mean anything unless a certain number of games has been played. Anything can happen on any given day.
 
First of all, there's less than 10% minorities, second, less than 3% of those are people who actually looks a tad different and speaks a different language more or less. Don't talk about things that you know nothing of. Third, China has is doing great, if China is considered doing horrible than what's India half dead?

Don't disrespect soldiers, if you want to do that in 1962 we slaughtered more than 1,200, with further missing and captured some 3000, you really want to play this game with us?

1967 is an isolated and small incident, I'm sure if you isolate events, some days even the Taliban has killed more American soldiers, does this mean Taliban superiority or victory?

I'm not sure how similar cricket is to Baseball, but in baseball, sample size is key, batting average doesn't mean anything unless a certain number of games has been played. Anything can happen on any given day.

That isolated incident in 1967 resulted in an Independent country becoming a part of the Indian Union. China claimed Sikkim as a part of Tibet for "historical" reasons and failed to grab it. So I guess India will not give a walk-over to China as predicted by a few proud CCP internet warriors.
 
1. How much time will it take us to turn the peaceful Tibetan struggle into an armed struggle? I guess less than 24 hours.
damaging is always easier than building, I believe you can, China also can.

2. An authoritarian regime is more susceptible to "separatist movements" than a liberal state. What we are seeing in China is just the tip of the iceburg. A regime weakened by wars will crumble under it's own weight. An Indo-China war will be an invitation for the separatists fighting against the racist HAN REGIME.
Authoritarian regime is more susceptible to "separatist movements"? How do you get this? Libya? Iraq?
How many separatist in Phillippine, Indian?
Indo-China war will invite the separatist fighting against Han? not separatist against Indian? Even in peace time, till now, in india there are more than 10 million seperatist, China have encough enegy and power settle the few separatist, what about india?


3. It is not 1962 when 8000 Indian soldiers had to face 90000 Chinese invaders. China has learned it's lessons in 1967 and 1987. Things are not the same. China could not take Sikkim by force and it dreams about invading India?
8000 Indian, 90000 Chinese? Hehe, loser is loser, exaggerate own difficulty.
1967, 1987, Hehe, tell the world how good you are at that time, do they believe it, as Indian charactors, you don't hype this to the world? we don't need force, we will take back South Tibet, not invade India, it is not indian!
 
damaging is always easier than building, I believe you can, China also can.


Authoritarian regime is more susceptible to "separatist movements"? How do you get this? Libya? Iraq?
How many separatist in Phillippine, Indian?
Indo-China war will invite the separatist fighting against Han? not separatist against Indian? Even in peace time, till now, in india there are more than 10 million seperatist, China have encough enegy and power settle the few separatist, what about india?



8000 Indian, 90000 Chinese? Hehe, loser is loser, exaggerate own difficulty.
1967, 1987, Hehe, tell the world how good you are at that time, do they believe it, as Indian charactors, you don't hype this to the world? we don't need force, we will take back South Tibet, not invade India, it is not indian!

China's homeland security nightmare is well known to the people who matter. CCP's first priority must be to keep the nation together which is about to crumble under it's own weight.
 
Qing Dynasty in 1911 wanted to send a military expedition to reintegrate Tibet under central government but Qing fell and it wasn't until 1950 that Tibet came under China's central government.

You can think anything how British got them but legally we own them because there was the transfer of those territory to india after British negotiated power transfer with Indian and Pakistani leader. Arunachal is not the land of Han and Arunachalis share nothing in common with Chinese people, so its our land.

Stop using the fake term mercy, China retreated because of their own problems.
The crime steal the car without legal certificating, then a moocher buy it from him in black market, then the owner find that, in law, who do the car will be judged to?

Chinese is not just han, fool, you indian coward talk well, pity Tibetan, not, just want the land, but can't get it by yourself, loser.

China can kick you out of South Tibet in 1962, now we also can, If we decide do that, yes, we retreating is our problem, We think you indian is the one know shame and disgrace, but find, you just coward and loser, hehe!



China's homeland security nightmare is well known to the people who matter. CCP's first priority must be to keep the nation together which is about to crumble under it's own weight.
China is much more stable than you india, at least, in China, no more than 10 million separatist with arm, and attack you indian again and again, kill many indian.

As a country, people thought Bombay is 20 year ahead of Shanghai, think China is poorer than Inidan, do you think what it know, you know shit about China!
 
China can kick you out of South Tibet in 1962, now we also can, If we decide do that, yes, we retreating is our problem, We think you indian is the one know shame and disgrace, but find, you just coward and loser, hehe!

If you can why did your PLA ran back from Arunachal Pradesh in1962 ??
 
The crime steal the car without legal certificating, then a moocher buy it from him in black market, then the owner find that, in law, who do the car will be judged to?

Chinese is not just han, fool, you indian coward talk well, pity Tibetan, not, just want the land, but can't get it by yourself, loser.

China can kick you out of South Tibet in 1962, now we also can, If we decide do that, yes, we retreating is our problem, We think you indian is the one know shame and disgrace, but find, you just coward and loser, hehe!

You did not because you could not. China decided to declare ceasefire and withdraw before it feared that India could send reinforcements and the PLA could risk loosing it's gains because of the logistical nightmares it had started to face. Stop playing saint.

The CCP regime is a murderous racist HAN regime.
 
The crime steal the car without legal certificating, then a moocher buy it from him in black market, then the owner find that, in law, who do the car will be judged to?

Chinese is not just han, fool, you indian coward talk well, pity Tibetan, not, just want the land, but can't get it by yourself, loser.

China can kick you out of South Tibet in 1962, now we also can, If we decide do that, yes, we retreating is our problem, We think you indian is the one know shame and disgrace, but find, you just coward and loser, hehe!

Stop making me bored with such fake and fancy words. You don't own that land, nor you have any historical connection with those people of Arunachal. You don't have any god gifted ownership on that land, Its sounds extemely bizarre that you parrot day and night against British imperialism but but always want to own the empire built on the brutality against non-Han/non-Manchus like Dzungarians and Miaos.

If you can why did your PLA ran back from Arunachal Pradesh in1962 ??

Arunachal was accessible from Tibet only for few months in a year and Chinese decided to retreat for their own safety.
 
Back
Top Bottom