What's new

Al-Sisi: No one will be able to take a drop of water from Egypt. And whoever wants to be tested, let him be tested

. .
Al-Sisi said:

"We do not talk too much, but I am telling to all the people that no one can take a drop of water from Egypt, and those who want to try can try. We do not threaten anyone, and our dialogue is always very rational and patient, but no one will be able to take a drop of water from Egypt or there will be a state of instability in the region no one can imagine . and no one should think to be able to remain far from our ability, I have never spoken like this, and not threatening anyone. and I say again that the water in Egypt is untouchable and touching it is a red line ; Our reaction in the event of a violation will affect the entire economy of the region, thank you."




Al Sisi said:

"Egypt does not take anyone's water, explaining that sewage water is treated for use in agriculture instead of throwing it into Egyptian lakes and causing pollution.
Our battle is a battle of negotiation and hostilities are unacceptable ... But if our water supplies are affected, Egypt's response will resonate in the region."

https://arabic.rt.com/middle_east/1216693-السيسي-مياه-مصر-خط-أحمر-ولن-يستطيع-أحد-أخذ-نقطة-مياه-واحدة/



poor ethiopia
 
. .
Yes the Canal..

Why don't you go ask him? HaHaHa!
Interesting, do you have a link? I'd love to read more about it.

It wouldn't be the first time a nuclear power has used nukes to change the land scape, the Russian used a nuke to create an artificial lake...

.
 
.
You don't even know what a defense treaty is.if you're gonna talk about me, reply directly, don't be a coward.
The US had a plan in the 1960s to blast an alternative Suez Canal through Israel using 520 nuclear bombs

Israel canal plan


https://www.businessinsider.com/us-...-israel-blast-with-nuclear-bombs-1960s-2021-3
 
.
.
Egypt won't risk war, so this is nothing more than bluster. Any attack on Ethiopia's dam would immediately isolate Egypt.
International law deals with the issue of methods and models for dividing international waters between the riparian states. The riparian states have concluded more than 300 treaties and agreements between them, and the United Nations reached the drafting of the Convention on the Law of the Use of International Watercourses in 1997, and among the most important treaties:

1- The Geneva Convention in 1923 It included:

A- Not to prejudice the rights of other countries in international rivers.

B - Each country enjoys, within the limits of the provisions of international law, the generation of electric energy.

C- The necessity of negotiations regarding the regulation of the exploitation of international waters.

D- The need for an organization to monitor and supervise public security in the international river basin.


2- The Declaration of the American States in 1933, which included several principles:

A- Recognition of the right of states to exploit their sovereignty over the waters of international rivers, both industrial and agricultural.

B - No country has the right to change the course of the international river without the approval of other riverine countries.

C- Any actions related to international waters, states should notify the countries concerned.

D- In case of disagreement, diplomatic methods and mediation must be resorted to.


Among the most important principles emerging from treaties and agreements in the use of international waters:

1- The river basin countries are prohibited from carrying out engineering constructions on the waterway that harm the water quotas of the other riparian countries.

2- Respect the rights acquired by each country in the waters of international rivers.

3- The importance of consultation and agreement between the countries of the river basin to take into account the rights of all countries.

4- Avoiding individual rights and preventing abuse of the right.
 
.
International law deals with the issue of methods and models for dividing international waters between the riparian states. The riparian states have concluded more than 300 treaties and agreements between them, and the United Nations reached the drafting of the Convention on the Law of the Use of International Watercourses in 1997, and among the most important treaties:

1- The Geneva Convention in 1923 It included:

A- Not to prejudice the rights of other countries in international rivers.

B - Each country enjoys, within the limits of the provisions of international law, the generation of electric energy.

C- The necessity of negotiations regarding the regulation of the exploitation of international waters.

D- The need for an organization to monitor and supervise public security in the international river basin.


2- The Declaration of the American States in 1933, which included several principles:

A- Recognition of the right of states to exploit their sovereignty over the waters of international rivers, both industrial and agricultural.

B - No country has the right to change the course of the international river without the approval of other riverine countries.

C- Any actions related to international waters, states should notify the countries concerned.

D- In case of disagreement, diplomatic methods and mediation must be resorted to.


Among the most important principles emerging from treaties and agreements in the use of international waters:

1- The river basin countries are prohibited from carrying out engineering constructions on the waterway that harm the water quotas of the other riparian countries.

2- Respect the rights acquired by each country in the waters of international rivers.

3- The importance of consultation and agreement between the countries of the river basin to take into account the rights of all countries.

4- Avoiding individual rights and preventing abuse of the right.
Ethiopia has already said that the dam shouldn't affect the flow of water for Egypt, so unless Egypt can prove their claim, Egypt really has no leg to stand on.
 
.
Ethiopia has already said that the dam shouldn't affect the flow of water for Egypt, so unless Egypt can prove their claim, Egypt really has no leg to stand on.
Ethiopians are all talk.. Egypt has proved it technically backed by many neutral western specialized firms and by its own experts..
 
.
Ethiopians are all talk.. Egypt has proved it technically backed by many neutral western specialized firms and by its own experts..
Not that I know of, do you have some sort of link for that as well? So far as I know, Egypt hasn't actually proven its claim. In fact, Egypt threatened to go to International Court, but never followed through with it.

Also, I wouldn't say the Ethiopians are all talk, as they've literally built the dam. The Ethiopians really don't seem to be taking Sisi's threats seriously.
 
.
.
Not that I know of, do you have some sort of link for that as well? So far as I know, Egypt hasn't actually proven its claim. In fact, Egypt threatened to go to International Court, but never followed through with it.

Also, I wouldn't say the Ethiopians are all talk, as they've literally built the dam. The Ethiopians really don't seem to be taking Sisi's threats seriously.

Yes it was detailed in another thread here on PDF..about the same subject..a post by yours truly..

Egypt went to the UN security counsel.. it is higher than the International court..


This is why they are hearing some serious talk now..

Egypt was not against building the Dam but the problem seem to be operational..
Then how on earth they were gonna live there after using 520 nukes? radioactive radiation would be significant ...
Iran's approach 2500 years ago was this:
View attachment 729825
Going through Nile ...
They found out it wasn't feasible because of that..
 
.
Ethiopia has already said that the dam shouldn't affect the flow of water for Egypt, so unless Egypt can prove their claim, Egypt really has no leg to stand on.
They said that but they don't want to sign on it.. that is not how international affairs and diplomacy are conducted..
 
.
Al-Sisi said:

"We do not talk too much, but I am telling to all the people that no one can take a drop of water from Egypt, and those who want to try can try. We do not threaten anyone, and our dialogue is always very rational and patient, but no one will be able to take a drop of water from Egypt or there will be a state of instability in the region no one can imagine . and no one should think to be able to remain far from our ability, I have never spoken like this, and not threatening anyone. and I say again that the water in Egypt is untouchable and touching it is a red line ; Our reaction in the event of a violation will affect the entire economy of the region, thank you."




Al Sisi said:

"Egypt does not take anyone's water, explaining that sewage water is treated for use in agriculture instead of throwing it into Egyptian lakes and causing pollution.
Our battle is a battle of negotiation and hostilities are unacceptable ... But if our water supplies are affected, Egypt's response will resonate in the region."

https://arabic.rt.com/middle_east/1216693-السيسي-مياه-مصر-خط-أحمر-ولن-يستطيع-أحد-أخذ-نقطة-مياه-واحدة/


Rather than threatening others, you can work with them.
We in Pakistan are facing the same issue with India. And we are in talks with India.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom