Regarding the IVC there are strong indications it was not Hindu - the houses are not separated due to caste, there are no temples, and many beef bones have been found showing signs of human consumption.
HAHAHA....
No offence BUT..Im seriously starting to doubt your lineage story given the poor display of simple history and common sense in the post above...
You sir believe in "oral tardition" as a form of propogation of history (something that is universally considered unreliable as well as exaggerated), yet voice doubts over verified and documented instances of history?
If you knew your history, you would have known that the IVC is the birthplace of modern Hinduism....a fact verified by historians much more reputed than yourself...LOL!
Religion like all things changes over time.....so comparing the Vedic religion (forerunner) of modern hinduism to the religion in its present form and drawing parallels of caste system and culinary practices is simply assinine.....
Secondly....your proof that IVC was not Hindu is based off Beef bones....LOL!
Is there any way for you to prove to me that the bones found were consumed by Humans and not wild animals, dogs etc....
Besides...nowhere is it said that Hindus of the past never ate beef...YET your bone theory was quite laughable to say the least!
Last but not the least.....the seal of Pashupati (shiva) has been found in IVC indicating a direct parallel to the evolution of Hinduism in these lands....this has been well documented by multiple historans....especially those that discovered and extensively studied the ruins, relics and remnants of the IVC
Now please research before posting anymore on IVC and its people.
See below....