What's new

Battle Report #13 - Battle of Jhelum/Hydaspes 326 BC

Hamstrung,net connection gone for more than 1 week.Stupid BSNL running me on a wild goose chase.Couldn't find out what the problem was and told me to format.Now formatting complete and still no net.Apparently they are going to send an 'expert' monday,lets see.Writing from cybercafe[obv can't do reports from here:(]
Oh man. That sucks. Dude... when the radio in your car is problematic, don't take your car for repairs. I'd kick the idiot who gives such advice of formatting for networking issues.
First off, can you check if you can get a different modem. Usually that is the culprit.
 
BATTLE OF JHELUM


With his preparations complete,alexander's army thus moved to confront porus rapidly.Porus was waiting for him on the east bank of the hydaspes/jhelum.Alexander had to subdue King Porus in order to keep marching east. To leave such a strong opponent at his flanks would endanger any further exploit. He could also not afford to show any sign of weakness if he wanted to keep the loyalty of the already subdued Indian princes. Porus had to defend his kingdom and chose the perfect spot to check Alexander's advance.

Size of the Opposing armies: A controversial issue.Approximate modern estimates.

Macedonian Army - 24,000 greek and macedonian infantry,8,000 cavalry,5,000 indian allies.Number of persian auxillaries if present unknown[little to no role in the battle]Total ~37,000.

Paurava Army - 25,000 infantry[normal figure given either 20,000 or 30,000 .So middle point taken]80-140 war elephants.300 chariots.3,000 cavalry.Total ~30,000.


Alexander's Crossing - Puru's first line of defense was the jhelum river.Over a mile wide, deep, and fast moving (unlike the river Granicus),and increasingly swollen by the monsoon.Porus believed Alexander would have to either wait for the monsoon season to end before crossing or simply abandon his quest and leave. In preparation for the Macedonians’ arrival, he stationed his army in a defensive position along the river and waited to violently dispute any passage of the river.As Porus had anticipated, Alexander made camp directly across from him on the west side of the Hydaspes and gave every indication he would wait for the monsoon season to end, even going so far as having large grain shipments sent in from his Indian ally King Ambhi.Realizing there might be spies in his camp, Alexander voiced aloud how he could easily wait until the end of the monsoon season before engaging the Indian king in battle. To support his boast he built numerous campfires along his side of the river, marching his men back and forth in formation - all the while searching for a suitable crossing spot. Curiosity drove Porus to initially shadow these movements, finally deciding they were only a diversion and stopped, although he continued to monitor possible crossing locations.
Alexander however had no intention to wait.He continued this farce for several days lulling puru into a false sense of security.Then one night it happened.


Alexander divided his army into three parts. A force of 2,000 cavalry and 8,000 infantry plus the allies under Craterus stayed directly opposite Porus' position. Alexander led the chosen force of 5,000 cavalry and 10,500 infantry, including 2,000 archers, while a reserve force of 1,000 cavalry and 4,500 infantry under Meleager waited for Alexander's force to secure the far bank and then join them. That night a terrible storm arose, with rain, wind and thunder. Using the weather as a screen, Alexander moved his turning force into position 17 miles upstream.Alexander even left a soldier dressed as himslef with craterus's force to confuse porus.

His chosen crossing point was a headland that jutted into the river toward a wooded island, providing concealment for his landing craft. The crossing was to be in three waves. In order to safely cross the river Alexander made rafts from tents and used the thirty galleys and boats from his crossing of the Indus River.Unfortunately, the crossing did not go as smoothly as he had hoped. Alexander was surprised that instead of reaching the opposite shore he landed on a large island in the middle of the river. From the island to the other side, his men would have to wade across.By dawn Alexander's force had crossed the river and begun moving toward Porus' camp.Alexander's force comprised at least 5 veteran phalanx battalions(taxies),~3000 elite hypaspists,4000 light infantry including peltasts,cretan archers and agrianian javelineers,1000 scythian and dahae horse archers and 5000 picked heavy cavalry led by 3000 or more companions.[rest would probabaly be thessalians]

Porus's Response - By now Porus understood something was afoot and when his scouts brought news of wet macedonians coming ashore on this bank,he immediately sent his son with a force of 100 chariots and 1000-2000 cavalry to investigate if it was a feint or delay the macedonians if it was a real attack.However by this time alexander and the bulk of his cavalry had crossed and reformed.This small force was assaulted by alexander's heavy cavalry and destroyed.The chariots got stuck in the muddy terrain and became useless.After losing 400 men including porus's son,the rest fled in disarray back to the main indian army.Porus however now knew for certain that alexander's army had crossed and was approaching him.This ill fated premature reconssaince in force however had cost him even more of his cavalry,he had been heavily outnumbered as it was in the beginning itself.

Porus's Dilemma :

Alexander's brilliant deception and bold tactical turning movement now placed puru in a dilemma.Scenario 1 is unfeasible as remaining in place will open up his rear to annhilation by alexander's turning force.


Neither is moving his whole force against alexander feasible,as then craterus will take him from the rear.


If porus bends his line and throws a blocking detatchment in alexander's path while keeping the larger part facing craterus,alexander will use his superior and more numerous cavalry to flank porus and take him from the rear while the infantry pins down the blocking detatchment.Such a move would also break up the concentration of porus's main offensive force-his elephants into halves in 2 directions.

If porus leaves a holding force against craterus and faces alexander with the bulk of his army ,alexander will attempt to flank him with his superior cavalry.This is the scenario that will actually play out.

Finally,porus could retreat however this would have serious disadvantages.Alexander numerous and superior cavalry could harass and cut off his retreating forces piecemeal with craterus joins from the other bank,plus ancient armies usually lacked the discipline to conduct a planned withdrawal in the face of serious opposition[no officer korps,no regulated drilling,usually levies].There is always the possibility that his army could just disintegrate attempting to withdraw.Finally porus,a proud kshatriya would find such a course highly disagreeable to his personal honour and prestige.Also this course would be wastage of his war elephants which can't be used unless ur facing the enemy[otherwise they will mow through their own troops]

Essence of the problem for porus is thus his inferiority in cavalry.This advantage in mobile striking power gives alexander the initiative in that he can pick the place where HE wants to fight and thus dictate the terms of the engagement.Porus's main offensive force-his elephnats on the other hand are difficult and unwieldy to relocate at a moment's notice.Porus thus chose the penultimate option.

Next: Battle begins.

Finally,net fixed.Going to finish this quickly tonight or tomorrow.
 
Battle Of Hydaspes[Contd]


Macedonians in grey,indians in pale scarlet.Porus leaves behind a contingent to watch craterus and moves to confront alexander.
Rectangles represent infantry,lined rectangles cavalry.Spokes elephants.Wheels chariots.Rectangles with smooth edges skirmishers/light infantry.

1]Part of the macedonian infantry is still crossing the river when porus's army comes into view of the macedonians.

2]The rest are wet and slowly forming up.The light infantry screens the flanks.Among them are peltasts,cretan archers and agrianians.Some are armed with axes which are hoped would be useful against elephant's feet or trunks.

3,4,5]Porus deploys his army in standard indic formation.A elephant line in the front interspersed with supporting light infantry.Behind them the main body of infantry composed of levy spearmen and archers and a smaller number of kshatriya swordsmen would be formed.On the flanks are the chariots-100 on each flank.Behind them are his depleted cavalry,perhaps 2500 strong after the losses in the initial skirmish.Porus places himself in the centre where he has a clear view from atop his elephant.With him is a small final reserve body of elephants.

6]Alexander's principal tactical problem is to use his superior cavalry to maximum effect,but avoid the war elephants whose smell the horses fear and against whom shock cavalry are all but useless.Alexander realizes a standard frontal charge with his shock companions on the paurava infantry line is impossible due to the elephant barrier opposing him.He must thus open up one or both flanks if he is to use his 'hammer and anvil' tactic.He must also buy time for his infantry to form up and join the battle.
He sends forward his superb central asian scythian and dahae horse archers[1000 men]to bombard the chariots and lure them out from the proximity of the elephants.The steppe horse archers are supported by sogdian and bactrian mounted javelineers.They proceed to initiate incessant archery fire from their deadly composite bows on the indian chariots.The chariots are closely packed with upto 6 men,of whom only 2 have shields.This non stop harassment and mounting casulaities has its desired effect.


7]The chariots attempt to close with the horse archers,However with the monsoon rains and the muddy river bank,they get immobilized by the mud and end up being sitting ducks for the withering barrage from the horse archers.



1.Indian left wing cavalry sees its chariots being slaughtered and moves to intervene.
2.This is exactly what alexander had been waiting for,the lead hipparchies of the companion cavalry led by alexander in person arrayed in wedge formation intercept the indian cavalry mid way in a thunderous clash.
3.Meanwhile alexander before setting off orders coenus,his lieutenant to take the 2 rear squadrons and engage the indian right wing cavalry.He is to conduct the redeployment behind the main infantry body so as to be invisible to porus's eyes.He does precisely this and puru is unaware of this cavalry movement hidden as it is by the phalanx's sarissas.
4.Porus senses the growing crisis on his left wing.The crack veteran companions with their longer xyston spears and heavier armour are steadily gaining an upper hand over the outnumbered paurava cavalry.Puru orders his right wing cavalry to reinforce his left wing and fall on the exposed flank of alexander's engaged companions.
5 and 6.Coenus suddenly emerging from behind the phalanx notices this move and follows the indian right wing cavalry.He intercepts them just before they are able to come to grips with the companions.The would be flankers are now taken from flank and rear and coenus's heavy cavalry.
7.Unable to withstand the superior power and numbers of the companions on one side,and coenus from the other,the paurava cavalry are increasingly pushed back into a small area.They break and flee to the safety of the elephants.
8.Meanwhile the 5 phalanx battalions[~9000] and the hypaspists[3,000] plus 4,000 odd archers,slingers and javelineers now form up the macedonian infantry line and begin to advance at the oblique -Hypaspists under seleucus[the largest division] taking up position of honour on the right.Note hypaspists[silver shields] fought as traditional phalangites in this battle.Next,from left to right are the 5 phalanx battalions under Antigenes,Cleitus the White,Meleager,Attalus and Gorgias respectively.

Alternative Hyposthesis -


There is debate as to how exactly coenus arrived at the flanks and rear of the indian cavalry-just that he followed them and caught them.The texts do not clearly mention if as on the first instance it took place in front of the paurava line or behind.Second hyposthesis assumes an elevated ground as u can see that masked coenus's approach.I think maybe first one is more likely as second one would imply that coenus circled round whole paurava army -essentially putting himself between puru's main army and his detatchment watching craterus and puru neither his reserve did anything about it.Also in second case distance covered by coenus is much larger.


1.Seeing the indian cavalry routed,alexander's horsemen attempt to push their advantage.Here the war elephants prove tehir worth.The horses are panicked and the attack of the companions repulsed - a first in a pitched battle.
2.Porus now presses his momentary respite.He unleashes his war elephants on the advancing macedonian phalanx.
3.The Javelineers and archers try to drive the elephants off with missiles but the elephants simply plough through ignoring their harassment crashing headlong into the macedoian phalanx.
4.The macedonian phalanx is shaken by the tremendous impact of the war elephant's assault.The macedonians have never fought these terrible beasts before and they take a heavy toll.Men are flung around in the air,mangled by their tusks or simply trampled.The fighting here is prolonged ,brutal and bloody.The phalanx 's cohesion is partially disrupted and it gives ground.

5.Encouraged by the carnage of the elphants,the indian cavalry regroup and again attack the macedonian cavalry.Outnumbered and outmatched they resist valiantly in utter vain.Result is a swift defeat and they retreat back in ever more dwindling numbers to the main body.


1.Meanwhile the assault of the elephants begins to lose its initial momentum as the phalanx regains its balance as the bloodbath in the centre slowly turns to alexander's favour.The beats become tired and their support infantry fail to follow up properly,the spearmen being held at distance by the long sarissas and the bowmen having trouble firing accurately as they are unable to brace their longbows in the muddy soil.The macedonian light infantry take a toll on the elephant mahouts and soon many of the riderless beats are out of the equation.Others are maddened by pain,as the macedonians spike their feet with their pikes.Now they lock shields,clanging them and making lots of noise to scare the beasts and advance as one body.The remaining elephants maddened with pain go berserk.

2.The maddened elephants turn round and mow through their own ranks,causing chaos and confusion and tearing holes into the paurava line.

3.The macedonian phalanx mauled but unbroken, now advances rhythmically - a rolling forest of pikes and makes contact with the indian infantry line.The paurava infantry are heavily outmatched in a straight head on contest against the phalanx.

4.Meanwhile after routing the paurava cavalry for a second time alexander now reorganizes his cavalry and proceeds to envelop porus's left flank from side and rear.This huge cavalry attack finally destroys the remnants of the indian cavalry which are penned up in a restricted space with no place to manuevre and attacked from all directions.Porus's left flank begisn collapsing under the onslaught.

5.Meanwhile craterus observes alexander making progress.The paurava contingent opposite him is dismayed at he turn of events.Craterus forces a passage across the river from the demoralized enemy.The paurava contingent withdraws -as craterus arrives on the east bank.He is now in puru's rear.

Continued -
 
Awesome read @AUSTERLITZ , great job! Puru/Porus is the pride of Punjabis and South Asians everywhere. Finish this and I shall post some more info that I have. BTW, an excellent piece is 'The Sword Arm of India' by Sir Dowles, 1932 or so chronicles the success of Punjabis in delaying and inevitably stopping two of the greatest conquerors: Alexander and the Mongols.

A few pointers: I find it best to use the nomenculture of Ancient/Medieval/Colonial Indian Subcontinent or South Asia while writing History pieces. It ensures that there's no overspill of present political situations to the study. This is also the international standard.

Secondly, the Punjabi arms are based on later sources, Mauryans were preceeded by this battle and there is some evidence to show that Macedonian and more importantly Persian influence came to shape the Mauryans post-Alexander. A strong point of evidence is that Mauryans used the ancient Persian text (Aramaic) whereas before that there is no evidence of such use. So mayhaps the soldiers of Porus might have been differently even if ever so slight.
 

1.Alexander continues his assault on the left flank with his cavalry.
2.Porus's tactical situation is now hopeless,but unlike darius he neither panics nor flees.In a desperate gamble he gathers a last ditch reserve of perhaps 40 elephants and leads a charge in person the macedonian centre- hurling javelins from atop his mount with lethal accuracy.This time however the macedonians are more prepared.The solid pike line,concentrated light infantry missile fire and the small number of elephants cause the attack to be repulsed.Porus is wounded several times but keeps fighting.
Coin of Alexander to memorate hydaspes.This depicts an alleged incident where porus on his elephant challenged alexander to a duel.Alexander accepted with the predictable result of a elephant-horse contest in that he was thrown off his horse and carried to safety by his bodyguards.

3 and 4.Craterus joins the attack from the rear and porus is now completely sarrounded.The indians attempt to form a double spear line box,but are unable to properly form it under attack from all directions.

5.A part of the paurava forces escapes the encirclement.Puru is surrounded but initially refuses any calls to surrender.An appeal by ambhi,his rival is met with a javelin throw.Finally a friend of porus's approaches him and convinces him to lay down arms.After 8 hours of heavy fighting,the battle of hydaspes is over.

He soon fainted from his multiple wounds.Brought before alexander,who was much in admiration of his valour and tenacity,porus maintained his dignity and pride and asked to be treated like a king in a well known conversation.And he was.Alexander accepted and Porus remained a satrap of alexander until his death and retained control of all his domains.This event should not be taken too deeply in sentiment,it may be termed strategic generosity.It was common policy of alexander in persia to keep the older rulers in place mostly -this removed the headache of local administration,minimized chances of rebeliion and local political power vaccuum and removed the need to provide legitimacy.Also Alexander was shrewd enough to want porus as an ally against his planned campaign against magadha.Just as ambhi with supplies and men had been indispensable as alexander's foothold in the contest against porus ,so too porus was probably to be against magadha.Soon we'll see that all this would be for naught.Porus regained his sovereignity after alexander's death,but didn't live to enjoy it.He was assasinated by the macedonian regent of the area who needed his war elephants for the succesor wars.Porus's son died at the battle of gabiene of the diadochi wars leading an indian contingent.Henceforth the whole area passed onto a new power and a ew conqueror -Chandragupta maurya,founder of the mauryan dynasty.


Losses -

Another controversial topic.Porus's army suffered heavily.Perhaps 12,000 killed and 9,000 captured.[possibly includes non-combatants].His brother fled to the gangaridai kingdom.
For the macedonians though it was not much of an occasion to celebrate.
Modern estimates are probably 1,000-1,100 killed and upto 3,000 wounded?Numbers vary from ludicrously low to very high.But all sources agree on one fact -That this was alexander's costliest battle.Taken that the macedonians lost 500-600 at issus and 1000 odd at gaugamela -losses would be larger than that to tally with the statement of costliest battle.The most clear evidence of the ferocity of the fighting was the duration - The battle lasted an incredible eight hours.Very very long for an ancient battle.[Considering that Issus lasted perhaps quarter of an hour to half an hour and gaugamela maybe little more than an hour,macedonian nerves must have been frayed at the prospect of going deeper into hostile territory.This would have consequences in the near future].We are told that bulk of the casulaities were in the veteran phalanx battalions which bore the brunt of the elephant attack,75% of foot companion losses caused by elephants.[phalanx ,again was at the forefront of the mutiny].Alexander had 7 taxies of macedonian phalangites in the indian campaign - [around 10,500 men].If 2,000-3,000 were total killed and wounded came from this group it would be very serious [as that would mean 20%-33% casulalities among the veteran infantry-the core of the army]
That a petty border king had caused such problems with an army 5 times smaller than darius and probably 100 odd elephants,would no doubt cause doubts as to the result in the soldiers mind when the bigger struggle against the nandas and gangaridai of the heartland with thousands of elephants and men began ,who was by now exhausted.(marched 12,000 miles)Puru's defiance at hydaspes thus played a major role in the subsequent mutiny that was to come.

Hydaspes marked Alexander's last great pitched battle,and is among his finest.The river crossing operation is now the standard prototype and served as inspiration to many later commaders such as napoleon at wagram and gustavas adolphus at lech.

Battle Analysis -


1) Deception - Alexander's deception was masterly.He was patient and observant and slowly manuevered porus into a lull.The best way to achieve surprise is to 'establish a routine,then suddenly break it'.Exactly what he did.The other measures were equally cunning.

2)Audacity and surprise - Alexander's audacity in crossing such a wide river in the monsoon and in the night amidst a thunderstorm was no doubt pivotal to his achieving surprise.Porus must have thought only a madman would attempt it.Coenus's move was another brilliant tactical manuever.

3)Mobility - Primary factor in alexander's success.The Mobile striking power of his superior cavalry,allowed him to dictate the terms of the engagement almost throughout.

4)Know ur enemy - Alexander was able to recognize the main combat potential of the enemy in his elephants and that of his own in his cavalry.He thus quickly ascertained who he wanted to fight and where and made sure his cavalry never seriously engaged elephants head on.

5)Divide Et Impera - Alexander's campaigning would proabaly be a lot difficult without his securing of ambhi's unconditional support by gold and latent threat of force.The abundant supply made alexander's logistics problem a minor issue.He was thus able to use local rivalries to his overall strategic advantage.

6)Durability - Alexander had reason to be thankful to his phalanx.The durability of philip's splendid instrument shone out again and bore the brunt of the porus's elephant assault.


7)Terrain and Weather - Weather and terrian hampered porus's army hindering both his archers who couldn't brace their bows and the chariots which became useless.


Next : Mutiny; Retreat;Legacy


Thank jaibi,glad u liked it.Yes mauryas showed persian influence.Greek influence was most visible in art.
 
Last edited:
ALEXANDER'S RETREAT


After hydaspes,Alexander built a city named bukephalia near the battle site in memory of his favourite horse bucephalus which had died of wounds in the battle.(or of old age..sources uncertain).This town grew to be a considerable hub and corresponds to modern jhilum town.His other foundation,the town of nicea soon declined and disappeared.From here the macedonians moved inward crossing the chenab and ravi rivers[acesines and hydraotis] with scant resistance but with increasing weariness on part of the rank and file.Enroute alexander came across the village of sages with whom he engaged in philosophical debates as he had done in greece as well.Results were uninspiring,his claims to godhood were rebuffed that every man was descended from god,and his contention to being lord of the earth was answered laconically
''Soon you'll be dead,and own no more of the earth than would suffice to bury you''..
Nonetheless one sage Calanus(Kalyan) joined alexander's entourage and would accompany him hereafter.

It had been raining non-stop for 70 days now.And mosquitos and mud added to the demoralization of the macedonians.Here on reaching the Beas river (Hyphasis) they recieved further bad news which finally snapped their patience.A local prince informed the macedonians that beyond the beas lay 11 days march through barren lands after which they would face the obstacle of the ganges,the widest and largest in india -even more so than the indus.And on the other shore Agrammes(dhanananda- mahapadma nanda was called 'ugrasena' or master of a terrible army -greek sources regularly mistook dhananada with the title of his famed father.From ugrasena is derived agrammes),king of the prasii(magadha) had blocked all crossing points and awaited with an army of 200,000 infantry,20,000 cavalry,2000 chariots and most imposing of all no fewer than 3000 war elephants!And beyond them the gangaridai with another vast army were waiting and would probably join the prasii.These numbers seemed incredible to alexander who asked porus of the truth,porus however confirmed all this.

''As for the Macedonians, however, their struggle with Porus blunted their courage and stayed their further advance into India. For having had all they could do to repulse an enemy who mustered only twenty thousand infantry and two thousand horse, they violently opposed Alexander when he insisted on crossing the river Ganges also, the width of which, as they learned, was thirty-two furlongs, its depth a hundred fathoms, while its banks on the further side were covered with multitudes of men-at-arms and horsemen and elephants. For they were told that the kings of the Ganderites and Praesii were awaiting them with eighty thousand horsemen, two hundred thousand footmen, eight thousand chariots, and six thousand fighting elephants''

At this stage the army simply refused to advance further.Alexander's attempts to rouse them with stirring speeches were in vain.Finally coenus,one of the heroes of hydaspes spoke up.
He urged his sovereign to remember that out of the Greeks and Macedonians who had crossed the Hellespont eight years earlier, some had been invalided home, some were unwilling exiles in newly founded cities far from their own land, some were disabled by wounds, and others, the most numerous, had perished by the sword or by disease.
Few indeed were those left to follow the standards, and they were weary wretches, shattered in health, ragged, ill-armed, and despondent. He concluded his oration by saying:–

“Moderation in the midst of success, 0 king! is the noblest of virtues, for, although, being at the head of so brave an army, you have naught to dread from mortal foes, yet the visitations of the Deity cannot be foreseen or guarded against by man.”

The words of Koinos were greeted with loud applause, which left no doubt about the temper of the men. Alexander, deeply mortified and unwilling to yield, retired within his tent, but emerged on the third day, convinced that farther advance was impracticable.The soothsayers conviniently stated bad omens,and to not advance further was declared the will of the gods to everybody's satisfaction thus saving the king's prestige.Alexander build 2 stone altars on the river bank and promise done day to return.He never would.However within a few weeks coenus mysteriously died.

What if he had continued?


A controversial question long debated.Alexander's main problems at this stage were logistics( he was thousands of miles into alien territory and very far from home),exhaustion and lowering morale and the erosion of the macedonian military machine.The splendid instrument that he had inherited from philip and led into persia had by now been worn down and reduced through constant attrition and detatchment as garrisons/sent home.Taking its place were increasingly mercenaries,auxillaries and local troops.It was simply very difficult for alexander to conquer such a vast area with his dwindling forces while garrisoning his huge empire.To make a serious effort he would have to return to his core empire,raise an all new massive army and start on a new expedition.Curiously though this he never did,despite his promise to return.From babylon he envisioned instead a march west,first into arabia,then through egypt and into carthage.Perhaps sicily and italy would follow?We will never know.(Interestingly the envoys to him at babylon included carthage,whom he threatened and that of a rissing italian city state -Rome).That he didn't seek to return to india was probably due to the last factor -the war elephants acc to some greek historians.

''Gangaridai, a nation which possesses a vast force of the largest-sized elephants. Owing to this, their country has never been conquered by any foreign king: for all other nations dread the overwhelming number and strength of these animals. Thus Alexander the Macedonian, after conquering all Asia, did not make war upon the Gangaridai, as he did on all others; for when he had arrived with all his troops at the river Ganges, he abandoned as hopeless an invasion of the Gangaridai when he learned that they possessed four thousand elephants well trained and equipped for war'' -Megasthenes.

War elephants are accorded high importance in the greek journals.Eudemes assasinated porus for control of his meagre 100 odd elephants.One of the objectives of seleucus in his expedition against the mauryas was not only to take back the western satrapies overrun by chnadragupta ,but also to capture war elephants for his army to use in the successor wars.He lost the satrapies but got 500 war elephants which he used decisively at Ipsus to win his empire.The seleucid-mauryan war which the seleucus fought with an army identical to alexander's illustrates the difficulties that alexander would have faced.However it also shows the importance of a capable king in ancient warfare.Seleucus was no alexander ,and dhanananda no chandragupta.

Chandragupta(who is said to have met alexander in his youth) however thought alexander could have defeated the nandas.The reason he cites for this is that the people were fed up of dhanananda's tyranny.However whether they would have opted for foreign domination of alexander is open to question.This does however raise an important point - Ancient armies have on many occasions melted away after its leader's death or flight.Darius's huge army did this on 2 occasions.That the performance of porus's army was so impressive had mauch to do with porus's own inspirational conduct.Thus who alexander would have faced would make a big difference.

Finally there is a issue with the incredible size of these elephant armies.There are 2 points to consider here.One greek historians invariably clump pack elephants with battle elpahants when considering numbers increasing total figure.However we do see chandragupta readily GIFTING 500 battle elphants to seleucus,an adversary with whom he had just made peace.The fact that he didn't fear that this number could be used against him to any appreciable effect shows that there may be truth to the figures given for the maurya total of 9000 elephants.


Mallian Campaign -

After confirming Ambhi as ruler between the indus and hydaspes,and porus between hydaspes and hyphasis alexander began his retreat.Before this however he decided to secure the flank of his new conquests by subduing the malli.This campaign is explained in excellent detail,move by move in wikipedia so i'm not expanding it here.
Mallian Campaign - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This involved the siege of multan.It was also in this campaign that alexander was shot in the chest by an arrow that punctured his lung and almost killed him.


After this short,violent but operationally brilliant interlude he resumed his march back to babylon.However so as to not give the impression of weakness to the recently subdued areas by marching back the same route he divided his force into 2 divisions which secured marched back seperately and were to unite later.One under craterus took a northern route,alexander however opted to march straight through the inhospitable gedrosian desert (modern makran desert) almost as if to prove a point as to fact that he had no limits.This move has been criticized by historians as one of the black spots in alexander's otherwise brilliant military career.Predictably thousands of macedonian soldiers died during this disastrous march and the accompanying non-combatants suffered even more horribly.This pointless desert march seems to have been the result of alexander's increasing delusional egomania.However on seeing the suffering of his men he never shied away from sharing them.

[Alexander famously refusing water]​

The army survived the journey,with enormous hardship and reunited with craterus.Alexander's indian adventure was over.It had failed badly in a strategic sense,but for personal glory's sake he partly achieved what he set out to do -the first ever european expedition to reach india.Something even the roman emperors would fail to carry out.(Though crassus and trajan tried.)

Alexander's Legacy -

Politically,the effect of Alexander's invasion was negligible.Its hardly even mentioned in indian chronicles.His satrapies were soon overrun by the mauryas who defeated seleucus's attempt to retake them.An ind0-bactrian kingdom remained for centuries on the fringes of northern india and even penetrated into the heartland for a short period after the maurya decline before eventually being pushed out and disappearing to the twin pressure of the indigeneous indian powers(sunga,satavahana) and the saka and kushan invasions from the steppes.
The most important influence were in art and trade.
* The routes used by Alexander became trade routes between India and the West. He opened a sea route to the West.
* Alexander brought with him several historians and scientists. These people recorded lot of details about the Indian society thus making a important contribution to ancient history.
* The Gandhara School of art is influenced by the Greek art.A fusion of indo-greek art led to creation of beautiful sculptures.


Militarily influence was very small and periodic.The Greek kopis weapon however seems to have been adopted in parts of india.The gurkha kukri is derived from this weapon.

x------------x​

That's all,Thanks for reading.Next Poltava.
 
:rofl::rofl::rofl:

You can prove it your's only at PDF not any where else..

You calling it Punjabi heritage but those people was not followed islam ..... People of this place converted to islam start to call them self Punjabi muslim but that does not mean they have sole right of every thing.


Only Indian Punjabi's are pure Punjabi people ....... no one else.

Only punjabis have right to it and not skiny, short tamil looking Indians. Hell they were not even ganga hindus but pure vedic in time of Alexander. Nothing to do with your ganga hinduism.
 
The rain doomed the Indians, plus Ambhi the traitor :angry:. Still Porus fought to the very end unlike Darius, what an amazing man.

Thanks @AUSTERLITZ, any idea how Chandragupta Marya was able to defeat the Nanda king who had a huuuuuge army? I have tried searching everywhere but could'nt find any record.
 
The rain doomed the Indians, plus Ambhi the traitor :angry:. Still Porus fought to the very end unlike Darius, what an amazing man.

Thanks @AUSTERLITZ, any idea how Chandragupta Marya was able to defeat the Nanda king who had a huuuuuge army? I have tried searching everywhere but could'nt find any record.

Chandragupta's initial assault by brute force failed and he was defeated by the nandas.[from here springs the famous story,chanakya saw a mother scolding his son for burning his tongue by foolishly trying to drink a hot soup from middle rather than the cooler edges.Chnakya apparently saw this and understood similarly that instead of attacking the centre of magadhan power he needed to wear them down from the edges of the empire]Thus chandragupta next regrouped with his powerbase in punjab and delhi region.From here he conducted guerilla warfare.Eventually drew dhananada out of the walls of pataliputra and seized it with combination of guile,bribery and treachery said to be masterminded by chanakya.Most of magadha's army defected to him.There was no grand battle.Dhanananda understanding all was lost went to voluntary exile,but was assasinated enroute [possibly by chanakya]to remove the threat in the future.
 
Last edited:
Thanks,intend to.Working on poltava now,after that austerlitz,blitzkreig 1940 and then the first of the crusades series i promised u.Hopefully.
I'm waiting for the blitz! Hopefully Operation Barbarossa too sometime in future
 
I'm waiting for the blitz! Hopefully Operation Barbarossa too sometime in future
Don't want to plan too far in future.I'll go step by step,after first crusade battle of britain, then barbarossa.Also want to do caesar's gallic campaign and mohi and leignitz of subotai at some point.Nothing set in stone as such.Only poltava,austerlitz and blitzkrieg decided.
 
As a student of history, per my observation, real reason for the success of Alexander also of the Roman legions against superior numbers boils down to 2 main factors.

1. Professional Army.

In earlier times, professionally trained soldiers were few and limited to the aristocracy and may be a company or so of the royal guards. Rest were yeoman/free citizens hastily conscripted into the service poorly armed and with little arms training. Most learnt the art of soldiering by actually fighting.

In Greece Sparta was exception to this rule but Spartans were restricted by their small numbers. Phillip of Macedonia or Philip the Barbarian as Greeks called him, created one the best professional armies of the world. Alexander inherited this well trained well-disciplined army along with some very competent generals such as Parmenio. Alexander had about 40 to 50,000 well-armed professional soldiers.

Opposing armies of Porus & of Darius were larger in number but battle hardened professional soldiers probably numbered no more than one half of the Alexander’s forces. The same was true of the Roman Army. It is said that Augustus had 44 trained legions. That means 44 brigades at the time when few countries could afford even quarter this number.

2. At the time when many war leaders could barely read or write; Alexander and some of his generals had been taught by the great Aristotle; arguably the most leaned man of his time. Similarly , Julius Caesar, in addition to being a military leader served as Quaestor, Aedile, Consul, and elected Pontifex Maximus. He wrote commentaries on the wars he fought in Gaul between 58 and 52 B.C., in seven books, one for each year.

In my humble opinion natural ability honed by scholarship is a deadly combination and therein lays the secret of these two greatest generals of the human history.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom