A.P. Richelieu
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2013
- Messages
- 7,724
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
Sir, since you are very well informed about NATO standard, please do comparison between JF17 and NATO standard to understand us where JF17 standing, otherwise i think either NATO standard is a myth created by west or JF17 really misses the target. Please tell us Where JF17 as per NATO or i will consider your statements not as per PDF standard. Thank you
I do not know the details, but I do know that Gripen A was not sellable to NATO countries,
because it did not meet NATO standards, but Gripen C was designed to meet them.
I doubt that there exists a document "NATO standards for fighters"
NATO is attempting to be more efficient, this means that they standardize a lot of things.
Which jet fuel should be used, lubrication etc.
Communication (Link-16). Encryption. Approved Missiles. Ammunition for the cannon.
Communication busses to hard points. S/W protocols.
They publish standardization documents for each category, collectively these are the NATO standards. Not all are applicable to JF-17. Standards for 155 mm artillery rounds is one example.
Even if JF-17 technically meets the standards, that needs to be shown.