Dash
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2009
- Messages
- 6,652
- Reaction score
- -14
- Country
- Location
Buddy, FGFA cant be completely different plane, the design of PAKFA was frozen long back, max change is its 2 seater, but that will not change the basic design.Oke see the link
rian.ru/defense_safety/20101007/283085938.html
And already one thread is running which says FGFA will not be copy of T50
achievements obtained during the creation of the T-50 will be used when creating a new machine
Which shows FGFA will be different from PAK FA..
And as far India contributing to Airframes via composite for FGFA..
there is a report
PAKFA: India, Russia Likely to Sign Co-Development Agreement in December 2010 | India Defence
I am not sure whether this will contribute to stealth technology... Since composite will be applied on Airframe i am hoping it will contribute to Stealth.. feel free to disagree...
And sirjee coming to your regular bashing.. on drag and AoA... how many planes did we create so far?.. While other players are Especially Dassault gave AoA 26 for Mirages and they have good experience of developing Fighters prior to this...
You have to understand that this is our first attempt in doing so and issues will crop up.. We have just got a consultancy ... which shows we are sailing alone so far... while others have got help from each other... Secondly one suggestion i will give you is.. Only if you work on the project you will understand how difficult it is.. Just seeing couple of reports and hearing from IAF speech you cant come to a conclusion how difficult the Program was... When DrDo Fails on Missile test we criticize it .. but you know how difficult it is to develop a missile without the facilities which others are having?? And criticizing is the easiest of all .. when people always tend to forget the achievements... Sit calm and see how Tejas started and how much it has come over.. As for Tejas-2 i have full confident that they will give a super bird... And they must have studied the issues by now and would have worked out on a solution... which will eventually go into Tejas-2... Even Microsoft releases several Patches after its every OS release which has got 3 decade of exp on OS alone.. there is nothing wrong if we run into some of the issues than a Show stopper....
So sit and relax AMCA will be a good product... i have full confidence on HAL-ADA.. If IAF doesnt have the confidence this project will not have gone to them again
We might change the sub systems and avionics, but expect a same plane as far as airframe, engine and Radar is concerned.