What's new

What Rahul brings to the table

.
Clearly you are desperately trying to find out what rahul actually bring to the table after deciding to vote for him just to spite the Hindus.

But that remains your problem. Not our problem since nobody even remotely sensible would vote for that joker.

I see no reason to help you white wash your future sins.

Hindus can take care of themselves. Be it the BJP or the Congress.

But those who are not Hindu can now only trust one India to thrive in.

And will vote accordingly.

The question that will be answered 5 months from now will be how many of our Hindus care for us.

And how many are against us.

Cheers, Doc
 
. .
Argument is flawed as it flows both ways. Emotional blackmailing is for childerns but they are in abundance so happy hunting.

But it's a fact Sam.

India remains secular because Hindus want it.

Not because Parsis want it.

So when you vote for Modi you are telling your Parsi brothers that you don't care for us. We should be happy we got a place to stay and pray in freedom. But the land belongs to you.

Cheers, Doc
 
.
Hindus can take care of themselves. Be it the BJP or the Congress.

But those who are not Hindu can now only trust one India to thrive in.

And will vote accordingly.

The question that will be answered 5 months from now will be how many of our Hindus care for us.

And how many are against us.

Cheers, Doc

Hindus are the most exploited people on the planet for the past 1000 years. First by the Muslims , then by the christians and by the parsis , all of who prospered on the blood and sweat of the Hindus while mocking and abusing Hindu goodwill for centuries.

What the jews suffered is NOTHING compared to what was done to the Hindus and their civilization. A holocaust that is still happening everyday in India, from Sabarimala to Ayodhya to Kashmir.

Now these exploiters have come back to preach morality and ethics to us. DISGUSTING.

When you kind landed in India driven away by the muslims, it was a almost 100% Hindu land that gave your kind shelter and space , both in the land and in our society. So you have no moral authority to ask "how many of our Hindus care for us". History has already answered that question very convincingly without any doubt.

What you have failed to ask is how many parsis have cared for the Hindus ? Why did you community prosper while the Hindus suffered in their own land ? who were the collaborators with the british ? who became more white than the queen ? so much so that Farrokh Bulsara became Freddie Mercury and called himself the queen ?

Who has adopted the ways of the white masters and not of their Hindu brothers ?

Who eats beef and drinks wine and takes the first flight out of India to find a home in the west despite being 10,000% richer than the average Hindu ?

So spare me your self pity and go beg some pakistani's for their understanding. You will be receiving nothing from me.

Argument is flawed as it flows both ways. Emotional blackmailing is for childerns but they are in abundance so happy hunting.

This is not emotional blackmailing, its parsi privilege speaking.

A 100 times worse than White privilege.
 
.
Hindus are the most exploited people on the planet for the past 1000 years. First by the Muslims , then by the christians and by the parsis , all of who prospered on the blood and sweat of the Hindus while mocking and abusing Hindu goodwill for centuries.

What the jews suffered is NOTHING compared to what was done to the Hindus and their civilization. A holocaust that is still happening everyday in India, from Sabarimala to Ayodhya to Kashmir.

Now these exploiters have come back to preach morality and ethics to us. DISGUSTING.

When you kind landed in India driven away by the muslims, it was a almost 100% Hindu land that gave your kind shelter and space , both in the land and in our society. So you have no moral authority to ask "how many of our Hindus care for us". History has already answered that question very convincingly without any doubt.

What you have failed to ask is how many parsis have cared for the Hindus ? Why did you community prosper while the Hindus suffered in their own land ? who were the collaborators with the british ? who became more white than the queen ? so much so that Farrokh Bulsara became Freddie Mercury and called himself the queen ?

Who has adopted the ways of the white masters and not of their Hindu brothers ?

Who eats beef and drinks wine and takes the first flight out of India to find a home in the west despite being 10,000% richer than the average Hindu ?

So spare me your self pity and go beg some pakistani's for their understanding. You will be receiving nothing from me.



This is not emotional blackmailing, its parsi privilege speaking.

A 100 times worse than White privilege.

Technically it's not "Hindus" who gave us refuge.

We landed and stayed within Gujarat as a Gujarati tribe for nearly 700 years.

300 of those running and hiding and fighting once more in the jungles of Vansda and the hill caves of Bahrot.

Then we started migrating south and actually settled and built Bombay. And that (under the British came) is when most of the rest of India and "Hindus" learned about us. As a unique tribe that had been around for 800 year unknown to most.

And we about them. The rest of you.

So really honestly, we associate only with the Gujurati and Marathas. Not "Hindus" per se.

There is no larger "Hindu" debt as is often made out to be by the Sangh and its various similar thinking offshoots.

As I've told you before, a Mallu for a Parsi might as well.have been from Haiti or Zanzibar.

Hope that clarifies.

Cheers, Doc
 
Last edited:
.
Technically it's not "Hindus" who gave us refuge.

We landed and stayed within Gujarat as a Gujarati tribe for nearly 700 years.

300 of those running and hiding and fighting once more in the jungles of Vansda and the hill caves of Bahrot.

Then we started migrating south and actually settled and built Bombay. And that (under the British came) is when most of the rest of India and "Hindus" learned about us. As a unique tribe that had been around for 800 year unknown to most.

And we about them. The rest of you.

So really honestly, we associate only with the Gujurati and Marathas. Not "Hindus" per se.

There is no larger "Hindu" debt as is often made out to be by the Sangh and its various similar thinking offshoots.

As I've told you before, a Mallu for a Parsi might as well.have been from Haiti or Zanzibar.

Hope that clarifies.

Cheers, Doc

I couldn't care less about you weaseling out by denying the Hindu civilization of Gujarat. Its just another mark of your lack of character. (you are slowly but surely evolving into Joe sheares). The people of Gujarat had no doubt about their Hindu civilization and Values. Its the land of Dwaraka , the land where Krishna lived out his life.

If you stayed and fought in Gujarat , that was because it was your home and that is what you fought for. You certainly did not fight for the Hindus or for Hindu rights. Neither then , nor during the British Raj and certainly not now.

Its amazing how british collaborates are now claiming that "THEY " built Mumbai .... As if Mumbai was not built by its original inhabitants. :lol:

Very similar to the british who used to claim that it was they who built Mumbai and India.

Gujarati's and the Marathis are the most "Hindu" and "Hindutvadi's of all Hindus in India. Its the birth place and breeding center of Hindutva and Hindu swaraj. Its ironic how you divest them both from their Hindu identity when that is all they ever claimed.

For a person who is quick to weasel out of any debts, no debt is big enough or relevant enough. That is the typical parsi character. Distinctly different from a Hindu character.

Also not interested in any parsi recognition of any other Indian, mallu or otherwise.
 
.
I couldn't care less about you weaseling out by denying the Hindu civilization of Gujarat. Its just another mark of your lack of character. (you are slowly but surely evolving into Joe sheares). The people of Gujarat had no doubt about their Hindu civilization and Values. Its the land of Dwaraka , the land where Krishna lived out his life.

If you stayed and fought in Gujarat , that was because it was your home and that is what you fought for. You certainly did not fight for the Hindus or for Hindu rights. Neither then , nor during the British Raj and certainly not now.

Its amazing how british collaborates are now claiming that "THEY " built Mumbai .... As if Mumbai was not built by its original inhabitants. :lol:

Very similar to the british who used to claim that it was they who built Mumbai and India.

Gujarati's and the Marathis are the most "Hindu" and "Hindutvadi's of all Hindus in India. Its the birth place and breeding center of Hindutva and Hindu swaraj. Its ironic how you divest them both from their Hindu identity when that is all they ever claimed.

For a person who is quick to weasel out of any debts, no debt is big enough or relevant enough. That is the typical parsi character. Distinctly different from a Hindu character.

Also not interested in any parsi recognition of any other Indian, mallu or otherwise.

You are getting repetitive and boring. Plus I don't know what sense it makes to invest time in engaging someone who is probably going to get banned again soon.

You know my stand pretty well. I know yours. If there is nothing you wish to add anew then I'm not going to be playing this pantomime repetitively because you get your low level kicks from it. I'll engage you where I think you're making sense.

It might be a wait.

Cheers, Doc
 
.
Hindus can take care of themselves. Be it the BJP or the Congress.

But those who are not Hindu can now only trust one India to thrive in.

And will vote accordingly.

India remains secular because Hindus want it.

Not because Parsis want it.
It is true that India is secular because of Hindus. If it was Muslims then you know what would happen.

I and others have repeatedly told you that you guys have nothing to fear .You believe in live and let live. You don't want to impose shariah or convert hindus enmass. The few random attacks are just that. Random attacks by criminals who happen to be Hindus. Regarding that fire temple issue we support you but it is the court order. And we don't control the court otherwise we would have the ram temple long before now.

I am sure you would have heard of the tale of the first Parsees who came to gujarat. The king showed them a bowl full to the brim with milk .He asked we are full. How will we accommodate you? The parsee leader put some sugar in the milk which dissolved. We will live harmoniously and sweeten the milk.

Till you keep that promise nothing is going to happen
 
.
That was the promise made by a group of foreigners looking to settle on a foreign land. To natives.

This is my land. I am a native. I have one vote just like you. And you can spin on my fat white Parsi dick with your threats.

In the real world man on man I will eat you alive and spit you out. Like the putrid piece of saffron filth that you are.

Don't try your chutyatic veiled threats on me.

I will rip your tongue out and shove it so deep up your rectum, you'll be talking to your colon.

@waz @Oscar @Arsalan

@ranjeet @Sam. @GHALIB @Yogijaat @Joe Shearer @jbgt90 @AfrazulMandal @Nilu Pule @Robinhood Pandey @SrNair @Tom M @jamahir @Shankranthi @halupridol @Cherokee @Skull and Bones @Jackdaws @Khatri_pune @third eye @Kashmiri Pandit @dray / Rain Man @randomradio @SuvarnaTeja

Take a look at the future of India. And vote where your conscience takes you.

Cheers, Doc

Temper Temper. You need to cool down.
I did not threaten you.

None of the Sanghis say such things about even Muslims like you are saying to me.

You have one vote and I have one vote. Till we live harmoniously nothing will happen. The problem will arise when someone will disrupt the harmony.
 
.
The question that will be answered 5 months from now will be how many of our Hindus care for us.

And how many are against us
Your argument is fallacious. Voting for bjp does not automatically mean ppl are against the minorities.
And as per your own logic you are looking after your own to preserve your privileges and expect others to be unselfish ?
I for one, a non religious, never once been to a temple Hindu, will never vote for a guy like rahul who thinks basic acts like a cleanliness campaign should be mocked.
I can't speak for minorities but bjp is not a existential threat to minorities as is being presented by you.
 
.
Your argument is fallacious. Voting for bjp does not automatically mean ppl are against the minorities.
And as per your own logic you are looking after your own to preserve your privileges and expect others to be unselfish ?
I for one, a non religious, never once been to a temple Hindu, will never vote for a guy like rahul who thinks basic acts like a cleanliness campaign should be mocked.
I can't speak for minorities but bjp is not a existential threat to minorities as is being presented by you.

Take a look at the post above.

Nothing needs to be made clearer.

Cheers, Doc
 
.
Bro to be honest I used to despair as you till maybe a year ago.

Banda kaam kar raha hai. Haath gande kar raha hai.

Rajneeti to uske khoon mein hai.

Plus he has the charm of a clean man like his dad.

I see the Congress storming back to be honest.

On much the same plinths the BJP used to unseat them.

Democracy can be a bitch.

Cheers, Doc

Wait for elections in 2019... the RESULT would be on TABLE...
 
.
Take a look at the post above.

Nothing needs to be made clearer.

Cheers, Doc
I just see you being aggressive and losing your temper.
And reading your comments on the Mumbai metro tunneling and its "effect" on the parsi flame, frankly points to you being a orthodox person, a big negative in my view.
 
.
You are a low level chutya.

I say that with zero anger and a very benevolent frame of mind.

Cheers, Doc
When you run out of arguments start abusing. This is what you can do.

Just wait 5 months and Modi will come back. Then you will have 5 more years of saying Minorities khatre main hain even though no one has harmed you.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom