What's new

Vikramditya & the IAC Vikrant Threat To Pakistan Waters

You can't sustain a war for more than a week, two at the max.

Says who ?

BOOM boom , time comes , all gloves are off

All these "assets" fancy assets become meaningless real fast

Aircraft carrier is old technology past ... it was relevant in 30's and 40's and vs opponents that don't have nuclear capabilities

These are just walking sardine cans floating on sea

They look cool if you wana attack maldives or Afganistan
 
.
Says who ?

BOOM boom , time comes , all gloves are off

All these "assets" fancy assets become meaningless real fast

Aircraft carrier is old technology past ... it was relevant in 30's and 40's and vs opponents that don't have nuclear capabilities

These are just walking sardine cans floating on sea

They look cool if you wana attack maldives or Afganistan

Don't display your ignorance so openly. Afghanistan is a land locked country.
 
Last edited:
. .
Says who ?

BOOM boom , time comes , all gloves are off

All these "assets" fancy assets become meaningless real fast

Aircraft carrier is old technology past ... it was relevant in 30's and 40's and vs opponents that don't have nuclear capabilities

These are just walking sardine cans floating on sea

They look cool if you wana attack maldives or Afganistan

Not really.

For example, let's just say the US aircraft carriers in the Indian ocean were quite persuasive in making Musharraf and other Pakistani generals in deciding which way to go after 9/11.

Anyway, we don't really need a carrier for Pakistan. So you don't need to worry about it much.
 
.
Here

Aviation EXplorer: Испытания АВ «Викрамадитья» идут хорошо

Translate this page to English from Russian. You will find a line like this:

What a wonderful source :yahoo:

I was showing you little respect considering your rank. But as you have clearly shown, you certainly don't deserve it and should be treated like any other troll.

Respect is earned, not given. I have eared my badges, you on the other hand have earned your title as the epic troll.

You haven't researched a single f*cking thing.

You claimed that MIG29A has less power than MIG29K, i proved it wrong. Whose done research and who hasn't :woot:? Science is a bit** isn't it.

You were making claims of combat radius of mig 29k being 200-300 miles purely out of thin air.

I was using deductive reasoning, after all thats what we all have right now. My reasoning was based on physics, while on the other hand your reasoning was based on Shadow Hunter Logic devoid of any physics or science. In only your little world, an aircraft with TWR of less than 1 can launch with a full load of weapons with external fuel kits in less than 150m :omghaha:. Your knowledge of military affairs is quite amusing Sir.

When I proved them BS

You still haven't. You are yet to prove it to me how can an aircraft with a TWR of less than 1 in a clean cut figure do all these things that you are claiming it can.

Now since this proof has also been provided maybe you will choose to shut up and move on with your pathetic life.

Okay now you have pushed it. One more B.S out of your mouth and your gone. Consider yourself lucky i am not moderating this post.

I already had enough of your BS.

Your correct, no point in arguing with a child.

Consider yourself dismissed
 
.
What a wonderful source :yahoo:



Respect is earned, not given. I have eared my badges, you on the other hand have earned your title as the epic troll.



You claimed that MIG29A has less power than MIG29K, i proved it wrong. Whose done research and who hasn't :woot:? Science is a bit** isn't it.



I was using deductive reasoning, after all thats what we all have right now. My reasoning was based on physics, while on the other hand your reasoning was based on Shadow Hunter Logic devoid of any physics or science. In only your little world, an aircraft with TWR of less than 1 can launch with a full load of weapons with external fuel kits in less than 150m :omghaha:. Your knowledge of military affairs is quite amusing Sir.



You still haven't. You are yet to prove it to me how can an aircraft with a TWR of less than 1 in a clean cut figure do all these things that you are claiming it can.



Okay now you have pushed it. One more B.S out of your mouth and your gone. Consider yourself lucky i am not moderating this post.



Your correct, no point in arguing with a child.

Consider yourself dismissed

Questioning the veracity of proof as I predicted? Obviously you hadn't got any other argument left. You asked for a source, you got it. You haven't proved anything you said till now, just blabbering like an idiot. If you want to proved me wrong, you better what have been saying till now. But then again, how can one expect a person to learn who already thinks he knows everything. Keep living in your own world. Anyways don't bother replying. I prefer talking to intelligent beings only.

As for the logic part, first google what wing loading means and how it affects take off speeds.

PS: I never claimed mig29A has lesser power than mig29 k . seems that you have started lying as well.
 
Last edited:
.
Yes they are threat to Pakistan but Pakistan has invested in Carrier Killers as above member too has mentioned. For now these should be a threat to india's billion$ ACC's.

But I think in future Pakistan should try getting one.
i don't think we need one, because it is like a target calling for someone to hit it, supposedly if we hit an Indian carrier it will be a HUGE LOSS for them, in contrast if loose a few missiles or a few planes while attempting to destroy a carrier it will be nothing compared to loosing a while carrier.
 
. .
@Storm Force don't be over confident, because even US CBG is not invincible they have fear against China and they know in war nothing is invincible. Your thought look similar to makers of Titanic who claim it can not be sunk.:lol:
 
.
@Storm Force don't be over confident, because even US CBG is not invincible they have fear against China and they know in war nothing is invincible. Your thought look similar to makers of Titanic who claim it can not be sunk.:lol:
yeah but pakistan is not china.....:lol::lol:
And we know the capability of PN....:lol::lol:
I hope you remember 1971....:lol::lol:
 
.
@Janmejay its not 1971 buddy PN have learnt their lession although they are short of funds but they are doing many things which will put our adversary at bay and u don't know what kind of assets our friendly country is ready to commit in case of war with India, they are not fool to invest in Gawadar. :-)
 
.
@Janmejay its not 1971 buddy PN have learnt their lession although they are short of funds but they are doing many things which will put our adversary at bay and u don't know what kind of assets our friendly country is ready to commit in case of war with India, they are not fool to invest in Gawadar. :-)
China didnt help you in 1965,71 or 99....:lol::lol:
anyways if you think that then keep dreaming...:lol::lol:
This aircraft carrier is not for pakistan,our navy is enough to counter puny PN....:lol::lol:
PN does not have any chance against IN....
 
.
China didnt help you in 1965,71 or 99....:lol::lol:
anyways if you think that then keep dreaming...:lol::lol:
This aircraft carrier is not for pakistan,our navy is enough to counter puny PN....:lol::lol:
PN does not have any chance against IN....

At that times China was not going to become a super power and they had their own problems, today its totally different story, China is becoming a power to recon with and they are willing to project power beyond their backyard in future. The rise of China and India in last two decades have changed many things in the region. :-)
 
.
At that times China was not going to become a super power and they had their own problems, today its totally different story, China is becoming a power to recon with and they are willing to project power beyond their backyard in future. The rise of China and India in last two decades have changed many things in the region. :-)
China will not help you in any war becausw then they wont be able to catch with america which is there main aim....
Sino-Indo relations are improving....
We are doing buisness....
China may be willing to project there power beyond there backyard but not for pakistan...
 
.
China will not help you in any war becausw then they wont be able to catch with america which is there main aim....
Sino-Indo relations are improving....
We are doing buisness....
China may be willing to project there power beyond there backyard but not for pakistan...

Yes, China will not go to war with India if India attacked us but they had and will commit / provide assets to ensure that India don't get dominance in whole war. :-)
 
.
Back
Top Bottom