What's new

US, India and Japan launch joint naval exercises to keep China in check

So they are gonna cancel just because India says so? :D. So how are they gonna evict us?

Are you seriously stupid or what ? Please read how USA has been forced to abandon bases in 3rd world countries.

No 3rd country wants to get destroyed in India-China war. No foreigners are dying for you. Get used to that.

If China does not leave Djibouti at the request of the host government no one will let you in any country ever again
 
Are you seriously stupid or what ? Please read how USA has been forced to abandon bases in 3rd world countries.
US are abandoning them not in times of war and most of it is to maintain diplomatic relations. Cuba is a good example of US enforcing this doctrine, when a hostile Cuban government takes over, they are bound by strategic interest to maintain a base.

No 3rd country wants to get destroyed in India-China war. No foreigners are dying for you. Get used to that.

If China does not leave Djibouti at the request of the host government no one will let you in any country ever again
You are talking as if this is an all out war, how many countries are you going to attack, at most you will try to attack Djibouti base, but are you gonna attack US base in Djibouti? Or the Djibouti capital?

We are legally bound by an agreement, what is there to argue. If you go to court, even they would enforce that agreement. Notice Philippines only evict Americans after an agreement expires.

That's why I told you Djibouti and Gwadar are great pincer moves, it basically neutralizes Indian threat to the trade routes. You screw us downstream, we screw you upstream. Simple balance of power in IOR. With this in place, the war in the border can be localized, and you would most likely know the outcome of such a war.:D

I am just waiting for Gwadar to go online, it will have better location than Karachi.
 
Last edited:
You are assuming they will not allow, what are they gonna do when 100-200 planes flyover their airspace? :D. They can just remain neutral by not joining the war, and play innocent. If India attacks them, this will create another front for India. You telling me India can fight a 3.5 front war now? :lol:. Genius, first you say Chinese can't go through Myanmar and now you are proposing us to go through your NE states? LOL. Are you nuts? By then the war at the border would be ongoing to trigger scenario 2. And if you use air force in that skirmish, Tezpur and gang would have been neutralized.

:lol::lol::lol::omghaha: 100-200 fighter flying from China over Myanmar to attack India!!! and your takers and the rest of the fighters and escort will be saying hi to India??!!:sarcastic: what did you think you're attacking north korea:pleasantry:

I though you were professional now to think i wouldn't even consider as a keyboard worrier. go get your facts right don't write ur fantasy here
 
:lol::lol::lol::omghaha: 100-200 fighter flying from China over Myanmar to attack India!!! and your takers and the rest of the fighters and escort will be saying hi to India??!!:sarcastic: what did you think you're attacking north korea:pleasantry:

I though you were professional now to think i wouldn't even consider as a keyboard worrier. go get your facts right don't write ur fantasy here
Actually 100 planes is more than enough for A&R. This includes 6000km bombers. Read the analysis, this will happen after NE Indian air bases are neutralized.
 
Actually 100 planes is more than enough for A&R. This includes 6000km bombers. Read the analysis, this will happen after NE Indian air bases are neutralized.

:rofl::rofl: I told you not to write your fantasy here man:lol: IAF don't have a fighter, bomber or a fucking SAM:omghaha:

Kid forget about neutralizing Indian Bases When are you going to complete the Road there:omghaha:
 
:rofl::rofl: I told you not to write your fantasy here man:lol: IAF don't have a fighter, bomber or a fucking SAM:omghaha:

Kid forget about neutralizing Indian Bases When are you going to complete the Road there:omghaha:
No point to neutralize the bases when they are open to 'withdrawing'.:omghaha:

Check the distance between Vishakpatnam to A&R, with long range cruise missiles which you have NONE, :omghaha:decimating the base air defenses and runways and air cover from Yunnan and a CBG group incoming, A&R will be toasted in a jiff. Btw, read my scenarios again, it is all within Chinese capability.
 
Attacking Pakistan and attacking China+Pakistan are two different things altogether. Yah, only you have ships, missiles and submarine.

Yes, your Brahmos are 1000km, Brahmos again, dude, please develop your own cruise missiles. PLEASEEEEEE

India was attacking a CENTCOM ally, Pakistan was a part of NATO type group those days- We not only have ships but geographical advantage and very good allies in Japan and USA, who alert on every Chinese vessel- Yes every singe one entering IOR is kept track off-

Why Brahmos is capable missile, It splits naval ships in two with sheer Kinetic energy-
 
India was attacking a CENTCOM ally, Pakistan was a part of NATO type group those days- We not only have ships but geographical advantage and very good allies in Japan and USA, who alert on every Chinese vessel- Yes every singe one entering IOR is kept track off-

Why Brahmos is capable missile, It splits naval ships in two with sheer Kinetic energy-
Is there even such shit as a 'CENTCOM' ally? Can you tell me which treaty compels US to defend Pakistan? NATO type? Do you even know what is the NATO treaty about? Any attack on any NATO members means an attack to all NATO members, aka WWIII. At that time, India was a Russian pawn, now India is an American pawn, American could not intervene directly.

If you read my analysis, I specifically said US can only offer intelligence and also weapons sales. There is even a joke that the conflict on the border was a Chinese ploy to help Trump get weapons sales from India. :lol:
 
Is there even such shit as a 'CENTCOM' ally? Can you tell me which treaty compels US to defend Pakistan? NATO type? Do you even know what is the NATO treaty about? Any attack on any NATO members means an attack to all NATO members, aka WWIII. At that time, India was a Russian pawn, now India is an American pawn, American could not intervene directly.

If you read my analysis, I specifically said US can only offer intelligence and also weapons sales. There is even a joke that the conflict on the border was a Chinese ploy to help Trump get weapons sales from India. :lol:

Pakistan still is a CENTCOM ally, there's a CENTCOM office in Karachi- Its not like USA didn't try to defend Pakistan, they tried by sending their 7th fleet-

There's also a joke that Trump used that opportunity sell more arms to Taiwan- Wait that's not just a Joke- :lol:

BTW not a single weapon has been bought from USA under Trump administration yet- So you see who remains the clown here- :chilli::china:
 
No point to neutralize the bases when they are open to 'withdrawing'.:omghaha:

Check the distance between Vishakpatnam to A&R, with long range cruise missiles which you have NONE, :omghaha:decimating the base air defenses and runways and air cover from Yunnan and a CBG group incoming, A&R will be toasted in a jiff. Btw, read my scenarios again, it is all within Chinese capability.

That's what we're seeing there right now!!! China not being able to build a road:omghaha:
next is what Economical sanction on India:omghaha:

:rofl::rofl:kid get real.. Stop fantasizing yourself...When China enters in IOR during war Chinese will be roasted :rofl:

Just last month one of your Frigate broke down in IOR due to Propeller failur and was floating in IOR for 4-5 days along with replenishment vessels, while it was enroute to Russia for drills... Now think of war time:rofl::lol::omghaha::omghaha:
 
Is there even such shit as a 'CENTCOM' ally? Can you tell me which treaty compels US to defend Pakistan? NATO type? Do you even know what is the NATO treaty about? Any attack on any NATO members means an attack to all NATO members, aka WWIII. At that time, India was a Russian pawn, now India is an American pawn, American could not intervene directly.

If you read my analysis, I specifically said US can only offer intelligence and also weapons sales. There is even a joke that the conflict on the border was a Chinese ploy to help Trump get weapons sales from India. :lol:
You know what was the message sent out to the world from this standoff.
1)there is no such thing as peaceful negotiation on border disputes with China,they just grab your land while the other party is talking.
2)China when confronted will back off.
3)India stands with it's ally as per the agreement and China won't stand with it's ally when needed,example being the recent incident where NK and US,China simply gaveup on it's ally inspite of having a treaty to protect NK
 
Attacking Pakistan and attacking China+Pakistan are two different things altogether. Yah, only you have ships, missiles and submarine.

Yes, your Brahmos are 1000km, Brahmos again, dude, please develop your own cruise missiles. PLEASEEEEEE
If i were to shoot you with a gun, it doesn't matter i assembled it by myself or bought, Thing is you're dead.
 
Pakistan still is a CENTCOM ally, there's a CENTCOM office in Karachi- Its not like USA didn't try to defend Pakistan, they tried by sending their 7th fleet-

There's also a joke that Trump used that opportunity sell more arms to Taiwan- Wait that's not just a Joke- :lol:

BTW not a single weapon has been bought from USA under Trump administration yet- So you see who remains the clown here- :chilli::china:

They stopped not because they are afraid of India genius, it was because of Soviet Union, and because there is no 'mutual defense treaty', US was not compelled to protect Pakistan, thereby leaving the two to fight each other off. Hey that might be true also, China might just let Trump get some protection money from Taiwan to appease the hawks back in US. :enjoy:

I thought you just agreed to buy billions of unarmed drones? :D

That's what we're seeing there right now!!! China not being able to build a road:omghaha:
next is what Economical sanction on India:omghaha:

:rofl::rofl:kid get real.. Stop fantasizing yourself...When China enters in IOR during war Chinese will be roasted :rofl:

Just last month one of your Frigate broke down in IOR due to Propeller failur and was floating in IOR for 4-5 days along with replenishment vessels, while it was enroute to Russia for drills... Now think of war time:rofl::lol::omghaha::omghaha:
What do you want us to do to bunch of malnourished Indians with no weapons, holding hands in a human shield form? Mow them down?:lol:

That's what Nehru said too when we entered Tibet. :lol:. You mean broke down like this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Indian_Naval_accidents :lol:

If i were to shoot you with a gun, it doesn't matter i assembled it by myself or bought, Thing is you're dead.
The problem is when you run out bullets, you need to run to the shop to buy, while you run, someone will shoot you back.

You know what was the message sent out to the world from this standoff.
1)there is no such thing as peaceful negotiation on border disputes with China,they just grab your land while the other party is talking.
2)China when confronted will back off.
3)India stands with it's ally as per the agreement and China won't stand with it's ally when needed,example being the recent incident where NK and US,China simply gaveup on it's ally inspite of having a treaty to protect NK
Erm, did China back off? Last I heard someone was proposing to back off.:lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom