What's new

Turkish Peace Operations in Syria (Operation Olive Branch) Updates & Discussions

A captured memory card in Olive Branch operation reveals more pictures of child soldiers trained by USA-allied PKK/YPG/SDF terrorists in Syria, which is against the international laws.
''
5a9fb255c9de3d18f0c44fe9.jpg

5a9fb255c9de3d18f0c44fe1.jpg
5a9fb255c9de3d18f0c44fe7.jpg
5a9fb255c9de3d18f0c44fed.jpg

''
The source:http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/galeri-hafiza-kartlarindan-ypg-pkknin-cocuk-savascilari-cikti-40763911


The USA is in/directly violating the Int. law and agreements on the name of fighting terrorism.

The legal situation on the international system:

  1. Article 77(2) of the 1977 Additional Protocol I provides: The Parties to the conflict shall take all feasible measures in order that children who have not attained the age of fifteen years do not take a direct part in hostilities and, in particular, they shall refrain from recruiting them into their armed forces. In recruiting among those persons who have attained the age of fifteen years but who have not attained the age of eighteen years, the Parties to the conflict shall endeavour to give priority to those who are oldest.
  2. Article 4(3)(c) of the 1977 Additional Protocol II provides: “Children who have not attained the age of fifteen years shall neither be recruited in the armed forces or groups nor allowed to take part in hostilities.”
  3. Article 38(3) of the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child provides:
    States Parties shall refrain from recruiting any person who has not attained the age of fifteen years into their armed forces. In recruiting among those persons who have attained the age of fifteen years but who have not attained the age of eighteen years, States Parties shall endeavour to give priority to those who are oldest.
  4. International Criminal Court: Under Article 8(2)(b)(xxvi) and (e)(vii) of the 1998 ICC Statute, “conscripting or enlisting children under the age of fifteen years” into armed forces or groups constitutes a war crime in both international and non-international armed conflicts.
  5. Convention on the Worst Forms of Child Labour: Article 1 of the 1999 Convention on the Worst Forms of Child Labour states ... “shall take immediate and effective measures to secure the prohibition and elimination of the worst forms of child labour as a matter of urgency”. Article 3(a) lists “forced or compulsory recruitment of children [under 18] for use in armed conflict” as one of the worst forms of child labour.
  6. The 2000 Optional Protocol on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict provides:
    Article 2: States Parties shall ensure that persons who have not attained the age of 18 years are not compulsorily recruited into their armed forces.
    Article 3:
    1. States Parties shall raise the minimum age for the voluntary recruitment of persons into their national armed forces from that set out in article 38, paragraph 3, of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, taking account of the principles contained in that article and recognizing that under the Convention persons under the age of 18 years are entitled to special protection.
    2. Each State Party shall deposit a binding declaration upon ratification of or accession to the present Protocol that sets forth the minimum age at which it will permit voluntary recruitment into its national armed forces and a description of the safeguards it has adopted to ensure that such recruitment is not forced or coerced.
    3. States Parties that permit voluntary recruitment into their national armed forces under the age of 18 years shall maintain safeguards to ensure, as a minimum, that:
    (a) Such recruitment is genuinely voluntary;
    (b) Such recruitment is carried out with the informed consent of the person’s parents or legal guardians;
    (c) Such persons are fully informed of the duties involved in such military service;
    (d) Such persons provide reliable proof of age prior to acceptance into national military service …
    5. The requirement to raise the age in paragraph 1 of the present article does not apply to schools operated by or under the control of the armed forces of the States Parties, in keeping with articles 28 and 29 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
    Article 4:
    1. Armed groups that are distinct from the armed forces of a State should not, under any circumstances, recruit … persons under the age of 18 years.
    2. States Parties shall take all feasible measures to prevent such recruitment … including the adoption of legal measures necessary to prohibit and criminalize such practices …
    Article 6:

    3. States Parties shall take all feasible measures to ensure that persons within their jurisdiction recruited or used in hostilities contrary to the present Protocol are demobilized or otherwise released from service. States Parties shall, when necessary, accord to such persons all appropriate assistance for their physical and psychological recovery and their social reintegration …
    Article 7:
    1. States Parties shall cooperate in the implementation of the present Protocol, including in the prevention of any activity contrary thereto and in the rehabilitation and social reintegration of persons who are victims of acts contrary thereto, including through technical cooperation and financial assistance. Such assistance and cooperation will be undertaken in consultation with the States Parties concerned and the relevant international organizations.
  7. ...


The sources for articles above:
1- https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/475?OpenDocument
2- https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/475?OpenDocument
3- http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CRC.aspx
4- http://legal.un.org/icc/statute/99_corr/cstatute.htm
5- http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C182
6- http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/OPACCRC.aspx
 
. . . . . .
It says Ejder Yalcin but it’s one of those Armored F550 ford chassis vehicles
It was quite fun!!
I havent seen something like this as a person who survived from DonBass war.
İt was real contact or ambush. Usually normal fighters dont do that:)
They must have taken the advantage of being in the Ejder.
 
. . . . .
Still no source I see. And you're pretty gullible to think that picture is evidence, lol. Try putting an AK beside a newborn baby. Same effect.
 
.
You obviously have reading comprehension problems or are too foolish to realize how ignorant you are. The FSA is know to use child soldiers, plenty of photos of it exists but you accuse the US of breaking international laws because the Kurds have been known to use child soldiers.

I asked you to show me evidence of US soldiers fighting alongside child soldiers. You could not but insist on the US breaking international law.

The fact is, you are accusing the US of doing the same thing Turkey is doing; evidence has proven both the FSA and Kurds use child soldiers both the US and Turkey are affiliated with those groups. Your argument is stale and hypocritical.









So there are photos of Kurdish children with weapon in a war zone fighting with Americans?








I'm not sure what Russia has do do with any of this other then the fact that you are changing the subject because you dug yourself into a hole. I further find it laughable that you just tell me do find this information myself but can't actually provide it yourself :lol:


But please share your amazing google research on these mystical Russian chemical attacks because I could not find any evidence. Not even circumstantial evidence such as photos of chemical weapons at any Russian base. Anyone that claims Russia has used chemical weapons or barrel bombs in Syria are compete idiots.

- Photos of child soldiers of PKK terrorists directly allied with USA are available, Unlike FSA in Olive Branch and Euprathes Shield, as you admitted, However, it is still you expecting me to prove your claim to myself.

- Russians and Mullahs' attacks including chemical ones on civilians are documented, checked out via google; in your case the denial is comfirmed via your laugh.

I am out till encountered with arguments, no time to waste after seeing this:

 
. .
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom