What's new

The world is getting a harsh taste of China’s unsafe medicine supply chain

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
This summer, medicines from China have led to two global recalls, posting a huge setback for a country that has been trying to restore consumer confidence in the safety of Chinese food and medicines after a deadly episode of infant formula adulteration a decade ago.

The recalls involve widely used blood pressure medicines, and vaccines.

On Wednesday, authorities launched a recall (link in Chinese) of some products sold overseas by Changchun Changsheng Biotechnology, China’s second-largest largest producer of rabies vaccines, but didn’t specify which countries were on the list. Authorities have found that the company mixed some batches of its rabies vaccines with expired products, and had made up production dates and batch numbers since April 2014 (link in Chinese), according to an investigation team set up by the central government. No deaths or adverse effects have been reported in connection with the vaccines.


The overseas recall marks the widening of a vaccine scandal that has been roiling China since early July, coincidentally coming to light around the anniversary of the infant milk tragedy of 2008. Changchun Changsheng was found to have produced some 3.5 million shots of rabies vaccines that failed to meet the country’s safety standard, and had made about 250,000 defective vaccines used to combat diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus (DPT), commonly given to young children.

The vaccine maker said last month that defective rabies vaccines had not entered the market and ensured customers that (link in Chinese) “all rabies vaccines in the market meet the national standard.” The company has halted production (link in Chinese) since late July.But some countries banned products from the vaccine maker anyway. India, for instance, where rabies is endemic through the country, banned imports from the Chinese vaccine maker last week.

It’s not just vaccines.

The US, European Union, Taiwan, and South Korea have all issued recalls of commonly used drug to control blood pressure after investigations found that some of them contained a Chinese-sourced ingredient had been exposed to a chemical considered a probable carcinogen. The FDA first announced its recall last month, also just ahead of the 2008 tainted milk anniversary, and expanded it earlier this month to cover 10 pharmaceutical companies that have sourced the ingredient valsartan from Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceuticals. It’s still unclear how the chemical, which has also been used as a poison, contaminated the manufacturing process.


Some doctors say the valsartan case is among many that have made them increasingly cautious (paywall) about describing drugs from China and India. China has expanded food and drug safety regulation in the last decade after a series of safety failures, and as it tries to become a bigger developer and exporter of pharmaceuticals. Yet, it has seen repeated safety scandals over the years (paywall).

“It’s not just the pharmaceutical industry but a common problem. The idea of running a business with honesty hardly exists in China. Lots of industries are using loopholes, taking risks for profits because the cost of committing a crime is small enough to ignore,” wrote one user (link in Chinese) who identified himself as working in the pharmaceutical industry on Zhihu, China’s answer to Quora.

The tendency to try and deal with the fallout of such scandals by silencing online discussion and cracking down on parent protests doesn’t shore up confidence either. Those methods might work well enough to stifle domestic rage, but they won’t be of much use now that the scandals have spread beyond its borders.

https://qz.com/1352071/the-world-is-getting-a-harsh-taste-of-chinas-unsafe-medicine-supply-chain/
 
.
Where is 50 cent Army who always talk big mouth? When you guys are unable make an ordinary drug properly, why you guys bluff here all the time? You guys are unable to produce quality doctors, quality hospital nor quality drugs and you guys say that you will be able to challenge US?
 
.
We also had a massive and major recall in Iran for all Valsartan pills produced based on Zhejiang Huahai raw material

What a shit show

The Chinese government needs to put some people in jail for life or else .....

This is people's lives, not a fvcking joke.
 
.
http://www.theweek.co.uk/us/46535/when-half-million-americans-died-and-nobody-noticed

When half a million Americans died and nobody noticed




When half a million Americans died and nobody noticed


ARE American lives cheaper than those of the Chinese? It's a question raised by Ron Unz, publisher of The American Conservative, who has produced a compelling comparison between the way the Chinese dealt with one of their drug scandals – melamine in baby formula - and how the US handled the Vioxx aspirin-substitute disaster.
The Chinese scandal surfaced in 2008, shortly before the Beijing Olympics. Crooked dairymen diluted their milk products, then added a plastic chemical compound called melamine to raise the apparent protein content back to normal levels. Nearly 300,000 babies across China suffered urinary problems, with many hundreds requiring lengthy hospitalisation for kidney stones. Six died.

Long prison sentences were handed down and a couple of the guiltiest culprits were tried and executed for their role. Throughout these events, American media coverage was extensive, with appropriate sneering about the Chinese leadership's indifference to human life.
Four years earlier, in September 2004, Merck, one of America's largest pharmaceutical companies, issued a sudden recall of Vioxx, its anti-pain medication widely used to treat arthritis-related ailments.

The recall came just days after Merck discovered that a top medical journal was about to publish a study by an FDA (Food and Drug Administration) investigator indicating that the drug in question greatly increased the risk of fatal heart attacks and strokes and had probably been responsible for at least 55,000 American deaths during the five years it had been on the market.
It soon turned out Merck had known of potential lethal side effects even before launching Vioxx in 1999, but had brushed all such disturbing tests under the rug. :enjoy:

With a TV ad budget averaging a hundred million dollars per year, Vioxx swiftly became one of Merck's bestsellers, generating over $2 billion in yearly revenue. Twenty-five million Americans were eventually prescribed Vioxx as an aspirin-substitute thought to produce fewer complications.
There was a fair amount of news coverage after the recall, but pretty slim considering the alleged 55,000 death toll. A class-action lawsuit dragged its way through the courts for years, eventually being settled for $4.85 billion in 2007.

When the scandal first broke, Merck's stock price collapsed, and many believed that the company could not possibly survive, especially after evidence of a deliberate corporate conspiracy surfaced. Instead, Merck's stock price eventually reached new heights in 2008 and today it is just 15 per cent below where it stood before the disaster. (Amazing!:usflag:)
The year after the scandal unfolded, Merck's long-time CEO resigned and was replaced by one of his top lieutenants. But he retained the $50 million in financial compensation he had received over the previous five years. Neither he nor any other Merck executives was charged with corporate malfeasance.


Senior FDA officials apologised for their lack of effective oversight and promised to do better in the future. The Vioxx scandal began to sink into the vast marsh of semi-forgotten international pharmaceutical scandals.

Then in 2005, as he now remembers it, Ron Unz "was reading my morning newspapers, as I always do, and noticed tiny items about an unprecedented drop in the American death rate. Hmm I said, I wonder if that might have anything to do with all those other stories about that deadly drug recently taken off the market and all the resulting lawsuits."
The year after Vioxx was pulled from the market, the New York Times and other media outlets were running minor news items, usually down-column, noting that American death rates had undergone a striking and completely unexpected decline. These were what Unz, a dedicated news browser, was reading.
Typical was the headline on a short article that ran in the 19 April 2005 edition of USA Today: 'USA Records Largest Drop in Annual Deaths in at Least 60 Years.' During that one year, American deaths fell by 50,000 despite the growth in both the size and the age of the nation's population. Government health experts were quoted as being greatly "surprised" and "scratching [their] heads" over this strange anomaly, which was led by a sharp drop in fatal heart attacks.

For his Chinese melamine/Vioxx comparison, Unz went back to those 2005 stories. Quick scrutiny of the most recent 15 years worth of national mortality data provided on the US Government's Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website offered Unz some useful clues.

"We find the largest rise in American mortality rates occurred in 1999, the year Vioxx was introduced, while the largest drop occurred in 2004, the year it was withdrawn," says Unz. "Vioxx was almost entirely marketed to the elderly, and these substantial changes in the national death-rate were completely concentrated within the 65-plus population.

"The FDA studies had proven that use of Vioxx led to deaths from cardiovascular diseases such as heart attacks and strokes, and these were exactly the factors driving the changes in national mortality rates."
The impact of these shifts, Unz points out, was not small. After a decade of remaining roughly constant, the overall American death rate began a substantial decline in 2004, soon falling by approximately five per cent, despite the continued ageing of the population. This drop corresponds to roughly 100,000 fewer deaths per year. The age-adjusted decline in death rates was considerably greater.
"Patterns of cause and effect cannot easily be proven," Unz continues. "But if we hypothesise a direct connection between the recall of a class of very popular drugs proven to cause fatal heart attacks and other deadly illnesses with an immediate drop in the national rate of fatal heart attacks and other deadly illnesses, then the statistical implications are quite serious."

Unz makes the point that the users of Vioxx were almost all elderly, and it was not possible to determine whether a particular victim's heart attack had been caused by Vioxx or other factors. But he concludes: "Perhaps 500,000 or more premature American deaths may have resulted from Vioxx [my italics], a figure substantially larger than the 3,468 deaths of named individuals acknowledged by Merck during the settlement of its lawsuit. And almost no one among our political or media elites seems to know or care about this possibility."
I remarked to Unz that it seemed truly incredible that a greater than expected death rate of this dimension should scarcely have caused a ripple.
"I'm just as astonished," he said. "From 2004 onwards, huge numbers of America's toughest trial lawyers were suing Merck for billions based on Vioxx casualties - didn't they notice the dramatic drop in the national death rate?

"The inescapable conclusion is that in today's world and in the opinion of our own media, American lives are quite cheap, unlike those in China.
"Besides," says Unz laughing, "it shows the stupidity of our political leaders that they didn't seize upon this great opportunity. They should have just renamed Vioxx the 'Save Social Security Drug,' and distributed it free in very large doses to everyone, starting on their 65th birthday. Maybe they should have even made it mandatory, three times per day. At sufficiently large levels of national consumption, Vioxx could have almost singlehandedly eliminated all our serious budget deficit problems. 'Vioxx - The Miracle Anti-Deficit Drug'."





:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
. . .
Where is 50 cent Army who always talk big mouth? When you guys are unable make an ordinary drug properly, why you guys bluff here all the time? You guys are unable to produce quality doctors, quality hospital nor quality drugs and you guys say that you will be able to challenge US?

Why does your shithole nation have a life expectancy of 68?
 
.
http://www.theweek.co.uk/us/46535/when-half-million-americans-died-and-nobody-noticed

When half a million Americans died and nobody noticed




When half a million Americans died and nobody noticed


ARE American lives cheaper than those of the Chinese? It's a question raised by Ron Unz, publisher of The American Conservative, who has produced a compelling comparison between the way the Chinese dealt with one of their drug scandals – melamine in baby formula - and how the US handled the Vioxx aspirin-substitute disaster.
The Chinese scandal surfaced in 2008, shortly before the Beijing Olympics. Crooked dairymen diluted their milk products, then added a plastic chemical compound called melamine to raise the apparent protein content back to normal levels. Nearly 300,000 babies across China suffered urinary problems, with many hundreds requiring lengthy hospitalisation for kidney stones. Six died.

Long prison sentences were handed down and a couple of the guiltiest culprits were tried and executed for their role. Throughout these events, American media coverage was extensive, with appropriate sneering about the Chinese leadership's indifference to human life.
Four years earlier, in September 2004, Merck, one of America's largest pharmaceutical companies, issued a sudden recall of Vioxx, its anti-pain medication widely used to treat arthritis-related ailments.

The recall came just days after Merck discovered that a top medical journal was about to publish a study by an FDA (Food and Drug Administration) investigator indicating that the drug in question greatly increased the risk of fatal heart attacks and strokes and had probably been responsible for at least 55,000 American deaths during the five years it had been on the market.
It soon turned out Merck had known of potential lethal side effects even before launching Vioxx in 1999, but had brushed all such disturbing tests under the rug. :enjoy:

With a TV ad budget averaging a hundred million dollars per year, Vioxx swiftly became one of Merck's bestsellers, generating over $2 billion in yearly revenue. Twenty-five million Americans were eventually prescribed Vioxx as an aspirin-substitute thought to produce fewer complications.
There was a fair amount of news coverage after the recall, but pretty slim considering the alleged 55,000 death toll. A class-action lawsuit dragged its way through the courts for years, eventually being settled for $4.85 billion in 2007.

When the scandal first broke, Merck's stock price collapsed, and many believed that the company could not possibly survive, especially after evidence of a deliberate corporate conspiracy surfaced. Instead, Merck's stock price eventually reached new heights in 2008 and today it is just 15 per cent below where it stood before the disaster. (Amazing!:usflag:)
The year after the scandal unfolded, Merck's long-time CEO resigned and was replaced by one of his top lieutenants. But he retained the $50 million in financial compensation he had received over the previous five years. Neither he nor any other Merck executives was charged with corporate malfeasance.


Senior FDA officials apologised for their lack of effective oversight and promised to do better in the future. The Vioxx scandal began to sink into the vast marsh of semi-forgotten international pharmaceutical scandals.

Then in 2005, as he now remembers it, Ron Unz "was reading my morning newspapers, as I always do, and noticed tiny items about an unprecedented drop in the American death rate. Hmm I said, I wonder if that might have anything to do with all those other stories about that deadly drug recently taken off the market and all the resulting lawsuits."
The year after Vioxx was pulled from the market, the New York Times and other media outlets were running minor news items, usually down-column, noting that American death rates had undergone a striking and completely unexpected decline. These were what Unz, a dedicated news browser, was reading.
Typical was the headline on a short article that ran in the 19 April 2005 edition of USA Today: 'USA Records Largest Drop in Annual Deaths in at Least 60 Years.' During that one year, American deaths fell by 50,000 despite the growth in both the size and the age of the nation's population. Government health experts were quoted as being greatly "surprised" and "scratching [their] heads" over this strange anomaly, which was led by a sharp drop in fatal heart attacks.

For his Chinese melamine/Vioxx comparison, Unz went back to those 2005 stories. Quick scrutiny of the most recent 15 years worth of national mortality data provided on the US Government's Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website offered Unz some useful clues.

"We find the largest rise in American mortality rates occurred in 1999, the year Vioxx was introduced, while the largest drop occurred in 2004, the year it was withdrawn," says Unz. "Vioxx was almost entirely marketed to the elderly, and these substantial changes in the national death-rate were completely concentrated within the 65-plus population.

"The FDA studies had proven that use of Vioxx led to deaths from cardiovascular diseases such as heart attacks and strokes, and these were exactly the factors driving the changes in national mortality rates."
The impact of these shifts, Unz points out, was not small. After a decade of remaining roughly constant, the overall American death rate began a substantial decline in 2004, soon falling by approximately five per cent, despite the continued ageing of the population. This drop corresponds to roughly 100,000 fewer deaths per year. The age-adjusted decline in death rates was considerably greater.
"Patterns of cause and effect cannot easily be proven," Unz continues. "But if we hypothesise a direct connection between the recall of a class of very popular drugs proven to cause fatal heart attacks and other deadly illnesses with an immediate drop in the national rate of fatal heart attacks and other deadly illnesses, then the statistical implications are quite serious."

Unz makes the point that the users of Vioxx were almost all elderly, and it was not possible to determine whether a particular victim's heart attack had been caused by Vioxx or other factors. But he concludes: "Perhaps 500,000 or more premature American deaths may have resulted from Vioxx [my italics], a figure substantially larger than the 3,468 deaths of named individuals acknowledged by Merck during the settlement of its lawsuit. And almost no one among our political or media elites seems to know or care about this possibility."
I remarked to Unz that it seemed truly incredible that a greater than expected death rate of this dimension should scarcely have caused a ripple.
"I'm just as astonished," he said. "From 2004 onwards, huge numbers of America's toughest trial lawyers were suing Merck for billions based on Vioxx casualties - didn't they notice the dramatic drop in the national death rate?

"The inescapable conclusion is that in today's world and in the opinion of our own media, American lives are quite cheap, unlike those in China.
"Besides," says Unz laughing, "it shows the stupidity of our political leaders that they didn't seize upon this great opportunity. They should have just renamed Vioxx the 'Save Social Security Drug,' and distributed it free in very large doses to everyone, starting on their 65th birthday. Maybe they should have even made it mandatory, three times per day. At sufficiently large levels of national consumption, Vioxx could have almost singlehandedly eliminated all our serious budget deficit problems. 'Vioxx - The Miracle Anti-Deficit Drug'."





:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
This is a different matter. Some time after use of some medicine, you realise that it has a harmful effect and hence it is banned. On the other hand, making fake drugs which can not comply with standard formulation and become dangerous for human being is is totally a different matter. It is simple a crime against humanity.

Why does your shithole nation have a life expectancy of 68?

We have reached from fourties to about seventy in seven decade. We don't have the practice to digest gutter oil so we are not strong enough to digest fake drugs.
 
.
This is a different matter. Some time after use of some medicine, you realise that it has a harmful effect and hence it is banned. On the other hand, making fake drugs which can not comply with standard formulation and become dangerous for human being is is totally a different matter. It is simple a crime against humanity.



We have reached from fourties to about seventy in seven decade. We don't have the practice to digest gutter oil so we are not strong enough to digest fake drugs.


1980 china 66.99, USA 73.66, India 55.35

https://www.google.com/search?hl=zh-CN&ei=EA5wW8bLJafT0gL1ia6QCQ&btnG=Google+搜索&q=中国平均寿命

China overtakes U.S. for healthy lifespan: WHO data
Tom Miles
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...s-for-healthy-lifespan-who-data-idUSKCN1IV15L

After that, they were at :argh::argh::argh::argh::argh:
 
.
Exactly. From 67 , you reached 76 I.e 9 year increase. We touched 68 from 55. So even by chinees maths, we grew 4 years more and we are catching up fast.
 
.
This means Chinese medicines are below standard, deadly and bad for health.
 
. .
Recently some Chinese were arrested in India, as they were making fake drugs in West Bengal.
 
.
.
I still don't understand what Chinese leaders see in Pakistan. China should let India manhandle you folks and sort out the border with India. Win win.

I donot see what Pakistan sees in china, who plays debt games, sell below par products and when US block Asia Pacfic with heavy Weapons, block most trade routes, Pakistan gives another trade route another breath to China through CPEC.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom