TAI ANKA .VS. HESA S-129

[SOHEIL]

HESA S-129

TAI ANKA

 

[Axa-]

A cheap copy of Anka

 

[BordoEnes]

I dont think there is enough information about the S-129 to make a comparison to other UAVs... If there is then please make sure you have it writen down that would make a discussion easier.

 

[Serpentine]

We still don't know much about S-129.It should be tested and prove it's capabilities.

I don't think it's a right time for comparison.

The same about ANKA I suppose.Is it completely operational?

 

[500]

A cheap copy of Anka

Its not a copy. Its a toy model:

 

[BordoEnes]

We still don't know much about S-129.It shroud be tested and prove it's capabilities.

I don't think it's a right time for comparison.

The same about ANKA I suppose.Is it completely operational?

We had 5 fully operational prototypes which would have been delivered very soon but duo the recent crash of one of the prototype it has been delayed for another 2 Years, Damn it...

 

[SOHEIL]

i think we should improve the Landing gears

 

[TurAr]

i think we should improve the Landing gears

I think Iran should buy a decent camera first.

 

[BronzePlaque]

Both systems need to be operational fully to make such comparison imho..I dont know about S-129 but ANKA is still helding flight tests

 

[BordoEnes]

Well if i may make some suggestion the iranian uavs has still alot of major problems which i spotted right away a couple are the landing gear which will produce drag eventually and above all a inferior small FLIR which makes the rest of the specs irrelevant... Actually that counts for the ANKA to, The ANKAs FLIR is to heavy and the Iranian is to small... Each need some improvement.

 

[SOHEIL]

I think Iran should buy a decent camera first.

like you ???

i can't see any problem in camera , Believe me , it is far more better than yours

 

[BordoEnes]

like you ???

i can't see any problem in camera , Believe me , it is far more better than yours

The size of the FLIR already says enough about how good it is and it doesnt look better then Aselfir-300 at all...

 

[BronzePlaque]

like you ???

i can't see any problem in camera , Believe me , it is far more better than yours

Why should we believe mate? Just because you said so? I dont think so..If you think its better, please tell us how..Then may be your argument will hold some weight..Thanks

 

[cabatli_53]

At first, It isn't known wheather Iranian UAV is a tactical or MALE class UAV (in accordance with NATO specification requirements). If you ask me, It looks more like a tactical UAV that is almost same with Israeli Hermes-450. If It is a tactical UAV, There is no need to compare...


Secondly, It isn't a shame to compare a Turkish designed MALE UAV with biggest Iranian technology for an avarage Persian who introduces Iranian technology as "best of the World" and Iran as "The king of region", While classifying Turkish industrial efforts as cheap "F-16 assembly center", "Screwing the bolts of European systems" without any technological advancement When It is compared with Iran ? It isn't a contradiction for such a "big" technology center country called Iran which can't come up with a MALE class UAV and proceeding the achievements behind of "low" Turkey ?

 

[SOHEIL]

Well if i may make some suggestion the iranian uavs has still alot of major problems which i spotted right away a couple are the landing gear which will produce drag eventually and above all a inferior small FLIR which makes the rest of the specs irrelevant... Actually that counts for the ANKA to, The ANKAs FLIR is to heavy and the Iranian is to small... Each need some improvement.

Small ???

Look at this one : Hermes 900