What's new

Russian Engine Could Boost Chinese Competitiveness

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
33,771
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
By WENDELL MINNICK


TAIPEI — Moscow’s decision to give Beijing access to Russian-made RD-93 jet engines will allow China’s Chengdu FC-1 Fierce Dragon (Xiaolong) to compete for sales against Lockheed Martin and MiG fighters, analysts said.
Richard Fisher, vice president of the Washington-based International Assessment and Strategy Center, said this will place new pressure on the MiG Corp., “which will now be stressed to develop a new lightweight fighter with better price and performance to compete with Chengdu’s fighters.”
Russia’s Kommersant newspaper reported on Nov. 20 that Moscow will allow China to fit the RD-93 in Pakistan’s JF-17 Thunder, a variant of the FC-1.
The FC-1 is also a potential competitor against the F-16 on the world market. The delta-winged, single-engine fighter tops out at Mach 1.6 and is seen as a cheaper, more rugged competitor to the F-16. Additionally, countries that have been hit by U.S. military sanctions, like Thailand, might see the FC-1 as an attractive alternative to F-16s that carry political strings.
The RD-93 has a basic thrust of 11,090 pounds, and with afterburner, 18,260 pounds. It is a variant of the RD-33, which powers the MiG-29 fighter.
U.S. political actions against Pakistan in the past 30 years include sanctions placed on Islamabad after a series of nuclear weapons tests in 1998 and additional sanctions after the bloodless 1999 military coup that put President Pervez Musharraf into power.
Both the multirole FC-1 and the JF-17 were jointly designed and developed by the Chengdu Aircraft Industrial Corp. and the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex in Karma beginning in the 1990s. However, due to pressure from India, Russia would not allow China to outfit the JF-17 with the Russian engine. This has slowed assembly of the JF-17, which opened production facilities in April 2005.
Fisher sees the recent decision as a major concession from Moscow that will allow China “to market its new generation of fighters long before it is able to sell them with Chinese engines, which may not become accepted by the market until they are proven in PLAAF [People’s Liberation Army Air Force] service, perhaps well into the next decade.”
“An agreement for re-export of the RD-93 may also soon include re-export of the more powerful AL-31FN, as seen by recent reports of this engine's sale to Iran in the Chengdu J-10. Reports also indicate Syria may also receive the J-10,” said Fisher.
However, Chinese officials at the Dubai Air Show on Nov. 13 dismissed reports of sales of the Chengdu J-10 to Iran, calling them a “fabrication” and “not true.” Andrei Chang, defense analyst of the Hong Kong-based Kanwa Information Center, said that it was unlikely that Russia would allow China to re-export the J-10 with Russian-made AL31F engines.
Algeria, Bangladesh, Egypt, Iran, Lebanon, Myanmar, Nigeria, Sri Lanka are reportedly interested in the FC-1.
DefenseNews.com - Russian Engine Could Boost Chinese Competitiveness - 11/26/07 17:18
 
F-16 block 52 cannot be compared with JF-17

JF-17 have good airframe to out perform F-16 in Manuvering may be ...but as a Multirole fighter no way..
 
Come on man :hitwall::hitwall:

It is a Point Defence Fighter and the F-16 is a multirole Fighter....

JF-17 in PAF will be used mainly as an Intercepter and Air Superiority fighter

No Comparison ..........

fighter having 3000km range and combat radius of 1250km is a point defence fighter??:disagree: you are underestimating it.
 
Its not meant for deep strike mission on its OWN....... Why are we buying AAR from Ukraine then......... For deep strike mission F-16 will be in AG role and JF-17 will be in AA role to escort the F-16 in AG config
 
As per the requirement of Intercepters....... F-7P and F-7PG are used for Interception for now ......... Mirage III roseI and roseIII are Interceptor Configs and Now with the Entry of JF-17 it will replaces these platforms.......

JF-17 in PAF will be an INTERCEPTOR ..............
 
The purchase of RC 400 Airborne Radar is for the same concept ... coupled with MICA gives JF-17 the Interceptor Config ...

RC 400 has can efective range of >100 Km
MICA having the range of 500m to >60 Km is a MRAAM cum SRAAM like SideWinders but is in BVR league......

So what you have is a INTERCEPTOR
 
Is Jf mach 1.6 or mach 1.8? Every western source claims it to be 1.6 like the artice mentioned above whereas other sources suggests its mach 1.8. It has to be mach 1.8 because intially it was 1.6 after redesigning the fouth prototype the speed was increased.
 
Back
Top Bottom