@Deino
No, I don't take it for granted. The lateral SRAAM bays are nonsense but the center bay or bays are possible. The whole intake and landing gear arrangement should be mainly for the purpose of center bays.
We have discussed the intakes and they make sense if hard maneuvering is not part of the operation regime.
There would be plenty of space for fuel, especially due to the unusual thick main wings and the thick fuselage.
The Qaher is either designed by a genius and highly unconventional or a fake project, there is more or less nothing in between.
A nice coincidence:
@VEVAK said last week that if GE would be useful, the US would have produced GE cruise missiles.
Just a few days ago a photo of a Chinese GE missile/drone was released:
Its performance stats speak for themselves and about the kinematic and effectively propulsive effectiveness of GE. This beast would likely fly more than 1000km out into the sea at very low level and even have time to loiter the target region for the target that has moved since launch (if no mid-course update is used).
Interestingly the Chinese weapon is flying over ground, well possible that Chinese plan to use it over ground too.
@Penguin also said that downward chanting wings have no effect on a GE aircraft. The Chinese weapon has a top intake (to avoid FOD?), hence the structure below it is not some sort of large intake, but downward chanted edges to better contain the cushion effect.