I dont think you have grasped the complexity of what you have said. Selex would not allow PAF access to their codes for integration of SD10. THhis would have exposed their premier commodity to the Chinese and compromised other projects. By the same token the Chinese were not happy to give access to Selex to integrate theSD10 onto Selex radar. There are other compatibility issues so the situation is not as simple as you have made it out to be. There was no perception of a problem. It was a no go area for both parties.
The Chinese products are now pretty much in the ball park figure so why compromise your relationship for a compatible product.
I think you are subliminally trying to influence me and sway me towards Turkish products. I can assure you the Chinese have now a very advanced programme which is giving out high quality results. I think Turkey is not at that stage. Their products are licence produced and although their is individual research over some aspects, they are more or less where we are. In some aspects they have better access to technology but Price remains an issue as it is a Western product with their own premium added to it. PAF in most cases unless pushed with no compatible product will go for a cheaper but compatible product. The Aselpod was an exception. There maybe other vendors who maybe in a position to give us compatible or better products and we will go the most economical way towards our goal.
A
Thank you, that does help me understand the issue better.
I think I'm trying to subliminally influence you to something you agreed with - diversity of suppliers. Because basing one's defence on one strategic partner is never the best solution.
Now, the problem you have outlined is one of two systems that are politically incompatible - viz - Selex radar and SD-10.
Let us assume for a second that it is perfectly fine for Pakistan to buy whatever it wants from China. And the main issue is quality of the product. One senior member on this board suggested Chinese AAMs may have quality issues. Another suggested the radar sets have longevity and capability drawbacks and quality issues.
PAF obviously wants Western-class systems. And it is trying to go for them. What does that say about Chinese systems? That they may be in the ball park, but not the best ball players.
This means that there has to be a strategic plan to look at other options. Whether Turkish. Whether Brazilian. Whether South African.
You are right, Turkey is producing a lot of licence manufactured stuff re-branded as their own. But there are areas where they are ahead and where they are producing a highly competitive product. For instance, in the Aselpod, you have a Western quality product at near Eastern price points.
Similarly, if they are doing R&D on a fifth generation jet, sure there will be other competitive components available. Or the potential for a superior system at reasonable price. For instance, an AESA radar.
At this point, PAF is happy to buy a Turkish product if it meets the quality and price point that they need. I'm not saying they aren't. What I am suggesting is that PAF needs to take the next step and strategically collaborate on research on specific subsystems. Whether with Turkey, or South Africa, or whoever.
This till now has been an exclusively Chinese affair (collaborating on research). Maybe it doesn't have to be that way. Just an opinion.
PS: In simplest language: "Pakistan wants to build xyz subsystem, would Turkey be interested in partnering the project? The result of the project will be equally shared between the two and the project may involve collaboration with China" (replace Turkey with country of your choice)