Pakistan has decided to use all military options against india

[somebozo]

Infact India never been the aggressor. You country is the aggressor always.

 

[haviZsultan]

Those saying India is never the aggressor they should tell us what happened during the Siachen war, which was undoubtedly the worst Indian aggression against Pakistan without being provoked in the least. The rest of the wars have some ambiguity though Pakistani version of events hold India responsible for the wars including 71 when India was training mukti bahini and giving shelter to those terrorists.

Indians are always led to believe that they never initiated war against Pakistan which is an absolute lie

 

[G0dfather]

Yes, including Hotspot Shield.

LOL, nice one.

they kept them hostage for many hours. Your QRT have failed you every where. on average they take 2 days to kill 1 attacker. It were the attackers who decided not to kill civilians. it takes only 2 minutes to put bullets into the heads of 20 people if you have the will. and they were fidayeen, they didn't needed hostages. They were there to fight till death. but they fought exactly as islam teaches i.e. not to kill unarmed civilians.

Remember kaluchak.

 

[dadeechi]

it's indian stance. but irrespective of who is aggressor indian army targets civilians including children.

The question is why are non military citizens and children present in a war zone (LOC) to start with?

 

[shah1398]

India must be responded with full might. We can't let our civilians and children be targeted and killed like that.

Today's cartoon in Nation says it all:

http://nation.com.pk/cartoons/18-Dec-2016/they-got-guns-in-their-hands-lets-target-some-school-van

 

[uzbi aka viper]

Infact India never been the aggressor. You country is the aggressor always.

we never attacked india...we always fight for the liberation of kashmir ..as in case of 1948,1965,1999 ...and kashmir isnt integral part of india..infact it was india who attacked us first in 1971...

 

[Basel]

what is the definition of aggressor and defender.


he should be handed over to @Zarvan lol

But @Zarvan may have to face whole India on many Indian Defence forums he is member of.

 

[shah1398]

Ok so u r going to retaliate?
Come then..
I remember 1971 when pakistan was having support from usa china,and they came to fight us together- result - china betrayed pakistan didnt participate in war ,usa was helpless , pakistan divided into two..
This time u have only china support - god knows how many parts this time,since usa in indian camp,russia will play neutral-china will again betray u since they are more professional..lol

I dont remember 1948 cz I aint that old but history reminds me that we captured as still have control on quite a big part of your ATOOT ANG and a big portion of land now know GB whom U can only show as yours in your map. N actually its kind of same 1971 situation but for U as U have support o almost all big powers and we......So howz that?

 

[chandrak]

I dont remember 1948 cz I aint that old but history reminds me that we captured as still have control on quite a big part of your ATOOT ANG and a big portion of land now know GB whom U can only show as yours in your map. N actually its kind of same 1971 situation but for U as U have support o almost all big powers and we......So howz that?

Well even the country u live in today was not urs ..1948 was the start which taught india that u cant be friends with us..
1971 was indian reply..
Lets come again for 2016-17

 

[Rafi]

@Rafi Sir do you have any information what is this all about ? I think we have given go ahead to Army to use heavy weapons like MRL and Artillery and may be even Drones.

Local Commanders already have the authority to use any weapons and tactics short of going to war. Article is a bit sensationalist.

 

[Mutakalim]

It's not in Pakistan interest to escalate the situation on LOC because we are busy in clearing our homegrown mess. Both parties know that. India will continue to poke nose and we will continue to show restraint. Just a feel good article.

 

[litman]

pakistan or "munh tod jawab" .shakal dekhi hay nawaz sharif nay apni

 

[koolio]

This is the right decision, cant let Indian Army go scot free with killing innocent civilians with impunity.

 

[xyxmt]

Infact India never been the aggressor. You country is the aggressor always.

and people say US govt fools their public only.

 

[Chhatrapati]

Whatever be the military option. It will be to prevent the further escalation of tensions.

Those saying India is never the aggressor they should tell us what happened during the Siachen war, which was undoubtedly the worst Indian aggression against Pakistan without being provoked in the least. The rest of the wars have some ambiguity though Pakistani version of events hold India responsible for the wars including 71 when India was training mukti bahini and giving shelter to those terrorists.

Indians are always led to believe that they never initiated war against Pakistan which is an absolute lie

Kargil war says otherwise.
Small correction about war in 1971 when India had an unprecedented influx of immigrants from Bangladesh during the civil war. India decides to train Mukti Bahini. It wasn't the intent but India was out of options. India didn't join the war until Indian posts were fired upon.
Siachen was an unoccupied and undemarcated area in J&K. So, India decides to acquire this strategic location before Pakistan does, is a mere military strategy.