What's new

Pakistan Day: Freeing the Colonized Minds of the Elites

RiazHaq

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
6,611
Reaction score
70
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
http://www.riazhaq.com/2017/08/pakistan-day-freeing-colonized-minds-of.html

Pakistan achieved independence from the British colonial rule 70 years ago. However, the minds of most of Pakistan's elites remain colonized to this day. This seems to be particularly true of the nation's western-educated "liberals" who dominate much of the intellectual discourse in the country. They continue to look at their fellow countrymen through the eyes of the Orientalists who served as tools for western colonization of Asia, Middle East and Africa. The work of these "native" Orientalists available in their books, op ed columns and other publications reflects their utter contempt for Pakistan and Pakistanis. Their colonized minds uncritically accept all things western. They often seem to think that the Pakistanis can do nothing right while the West can do no wrong. Far from being constructive, these colonized minds promote lack of confidence in the ability of their fellow "natives" to solve their own problems and contribute to hopelessness. The way out of it is to encourage more inquiry based learning and critical thinking.


Orientalism As Tool of Colonialism:

Dr. Edward Said (1935-2003), Palestine-born Columbia University professor and the author of "Orientalism", describe it as the ethnocentric study of non-Europeans by Europeans. The Orientalists see the people of Asia, Africa and the Middle East as “gullible” and “devoid of energy and initiative.” European colonization led to the decline and destruction of the prosperity of every nation they ruled. India is a prime example of it. India was the world's largest economy producing over a quarter of the world's GDP when the British arrived. At the end of the British Raj, India's contribution was reduced to less than 2% of the world GDP.

Education to Colonize Minds:

In his "Prison Notebooks", Antonio Gramsci, an Italian Marxist theorist and politician, says that a class can exercise its power not merely by the use of force but by an institutionalized system of moral and intellectual leadership that promotes certain ideas and beliefs favorable to it. For Gramsci "cultural hegemony" is maintained through the consent of the dominated class which assures the intellectual and material supremacy of the dominant class.

In "Masks of Conquest", author Gauri Viswanathan says that the British curriculum was introduced in India to "mask" the economic exploitation of the colonized. Its main purpose was to colonize the minds of the natives to sustain colonial rule.

Cambridge Curriculum in Pakistan:

The colonial discourse of the superiority of English language and western education continues with a system of elite schools that uses Cambridge curriculum in Pakistan.

Over 270,000 Pakistani students from elite schools participated in Cambridge O-level and A-level International (CIE) exams in 2016, an increase of seven per cent over the prior year.

Cambridge IGCSE exams is also growing in popularity in Pakistan, with enrollment increasing by 16% from 10,364 in 2014-15 to 12,019 in 2015-16. Globally there has been 10% growth in entries across all Cambridge qualifications in 2016, including 11% growth in entries for Cambridge International A Levels and 8 per cent for Cambridge IGCSE, according to Express Tribune newspaper.

The United Kingdom remains the top source of international education for Pakistanis. 46,640 students, the largest number of Pakistani students receiving international education anywhere, are doing so at Pakistani universities in joint degree programs established with British universities, according to UK Council for International Student Affairs.

At the higher education level, the number of students enrolled in British-Pakistani joint degree programs in Pakistan (46,640) makes it the fourth largest effort behind Malaysia (78,850), China (64,560) and Singapore (49,970).

Teach Critical Thinking:

Pakistani educators need to see the western colonial influences and their detrimental effects on the minds of youngsters. They need to improve learning by helping students learn to think for themselves critically. Such reforms will require students to ask more questions and to find answers for themselves through their own research rather than taking the words of their textbook authors and teachers as the ultimate truth.

Summary:

The minds of most of Pakistan's elite remain colonized 70 years after the British rule of Pakistan ended in 1947. They uncritically accept all things western. A quick scan of Pakistan's English media shows the disdain the nation's western educated elites have for their fellow countryman. Far from being constructive, they promote lack of confidence in their fellow "natives" ability to solve their own problems and contribute to hopelessness. Their colonized minds uncritically accept all things western. They often seem to think that the Pakistanis can do nothing right while the West can do no wrong. Unless these colonized minds are freed, it will be difficult for the people of Pakistan to believe in themselves, have the confidence in their capabilities and develop the national pride to lay the foundation of a bright future. The best way to help free these colonized minds is through curriculum reform that helps build real critical thinking.

Related Links:

Haq's Musings

Alam vs Hoodbhoy

Inquiry Based Learning

Dr. Ata ur Rehman Defends Higher Education Reform

Pakistan's Rising College Enrollment Rates

Pakistan Beat BRICs in Highly Cited Research Papers

Launch of "Eating Grass: Pakistan's Nuclear Program"

Upwardly Mobile Pakistan

Impact of Industrial Revolution

Hindutva: Legacy of British Raj

http://www.riazhaq.com/2017/08/pakistan-day-freeing-colonized-minds-of.html
 
.
Mr Haq I mostly agree with your OPs. But this I can't. I wish Pakistan elite had "colonized" minds. If they did they would act and behave like the Western ruling elite. Do they? No they don't. Pakistani ruling elite is not colonized. Japanese, Korean, Chinese and to degree Turkish ruling elite is "occidentalized".

Our elite is oriental to the core but with a veneer of colonization. Who do they act like? I don't see them acting likinf British ruling class? I don't see a Jeremy Corbyn or a Labour Party or even a Cameron of the Tory party in them. I see oriental Moghul and eastern autocracy. Simple as that. I see Moghul Kings and princelings with their courtiers and camp followers. I don't see democrats. I don't see any competent hardworking administrators. I see the same type who were ruling Asia when the Briitish came and took over the entire place because we were ruled by incompetent, corrupt, power hungry despots, lazy lecherous class.
 
.
People who fight for their independence, know the value of independence.
Americans fought for their independence they knew the value of independence. Right after independence they started making their own ways.

Thanks to Third Reich in Germany, the Govt in London was too weak to control her far away colonies and only after little pressure, London had to announce so called independence. But Raj ensured and trained the people, that when they left Subcontinent, power circles were full of their mental slaves.

Today Pakistanis are living in more severe and ruthless kind of salivary. They are slaves of salves. Each and every institution existed in Raj's era, is proud of it's colonial history, including armed forces, and not to forget about Pakistan Penal Code 1860 in Pakistani courts, though there was no Pakistan in 1860.

That's why when speaker of Pakistan's national assembly met the Queen. He proudly said, your majesty we are still your loyal subjects. A foreign minister, Hina Rabbani Khar was proudly presenting a man from British high commission the gifts and awards from Raj to her ancestors.
You can see videos of your leader walking like commoner on London's streets and same man between escort of 20 to 30 police vehicles in Pakistan. Hato, Bacho, side per ho jao, rasta chor do Ghulam kaoum.... ...British Raj ka Ghulam guzar raha he road sey.
 
.
I don't see them acting likinf British ruling class? I don't see a Jeremy Corbyn or a Labour Party or even a Cameron of the Tory party in them. I see oriental Moghul and eastern autocracy. Simple as that. I see Moghul Kings and princelings with their courtiers and camp followers. I don't see democrats. I don't see any competent hardworking administrators. I see the same type who were ruling Asia when the Briitish came and took over the entire place because we were ruled by incompetent, corrupt, power hungry despots, lazy lecherous class.

British prime ministers rule their country and their people as their own. Pakistani elite with colonized minds rules Pakistan as though it were their colony to be looted like the colonial rulers did. That's the crucial difference.

Mughals did not loot their people. That's the reason India remained the world's largest economy producing over a quarter of the world's GDP before the Brits arrived. Brits looted India's resources and impoverished it so much that India contributed less than 2% of world GDP in 1947.

And Pakistan's liberal intellectual elite look at their fellow countrymen with the same contempt as the colonial ruling class did. That, again, is the big difference.
 
Last edited:
.
Pakistani elite with colonized minds
as someone rightly said "Pakistani politicians are like aliens, who have come to our soil to plunder "

Mughals did not loot their people.
Kings rule for themselves and for their progeny. So they facilitate their subjects to unimaginable ways whether it was Qaddafi, Shah of Iran, Mughals etc
However, they hate just one thing that they cannot be questioned or challenged somewhat like Pak Presidents 'right'.
 
.
Brofessor sb,

Mughals did not loot their people.

The Mughals didnt "loot" their people in the sense of "taking wealth out of the country" because they couldnt. Where could they have taken their loot-to Uzbekistan? from where they were booted out in the first place?

Regards
 
.
Brofessor sb,

Mughals did not loot their people.

The Mughals didnt "loot" their people in the sense of "taking wealth out of the country" because they couldnt. Where could they have taken their loot-to Uzbekistan? from where they were booted out in the first place?

Regards

If the Mughals had looted India, its productive capacity as measured by GDP would not have remained the highest in the world.

The British did loot India and dramatically shrunk its GDP. Here's a review of Sashi Tharoor's "Inglorious Empire: what the British did to India" that deals with this subject:

Tharoor sets out energetically, bluntly and hurriedly the litany of exploitation and theft, and the support given to the East India Company. This was before the Government of India Act of 1858 led the British crown to assume direct control. The company had a private army of 260,000 at the start of the 19th century, and the champions of the British industrial revolution plundered India’s thriving manufacturing industries.
Under British rule India’s share of world manufacturing exports fell from 27 per cent to 2 per cent as East India employees made colossal fortunes. The marquess of Salisbury, secretary of state for India in the 1870s, remarked that “India is to be bled”, and by the end of the 19th century it was Britain’s biggest source of revenue.
“To stop is dangerous; to recede ruin” was the logic, as enunciated early by Robert Clive, commander in chief of British India in the mid-18th century. The Indian shipping industry was destroyed and Indian currency manipulated while tariffs and regulations were skewed to favour British industry.

https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/books/inglorious-empire-what-the-british-did-to-india-1.2981299
 
.
Mr Haq I mostly agree with your OPs. But this I can't. I wish Pakistan elite had "colonized" minds. If they did they would act and behave like the Western ruling elite. Do they? No they don't. Pakistani ruling elite is not colonized. Japanese, Korean, Chinese and to degree Turkish ruling elite is "occidentalized".

Our elite is oriental to the core but with a veneer of colonization. Who do they act like? I don't see them acting likinf British ruling class? I don't see a Jeremy Corbyn or a Labour Party or even a Cameron of the Tory party in them. I see oriental Moghul and eastern autocracy. Simple as that. I see Moghul Kings and princelings with their courtiers and camp followers. I don't see democrats. I don't see any competent hardworking administrators. I see the same type who were ruling Asia when the Briitish came and took over the entire place because we were ruled by incompetent, corrupt, power hungry despots, lazy lecherous class.

There is no RULING class in the land of the Free.

and as for the red part.

I am just going to say i feel sorry for you.
 
. .
#India at 70: #Lynchistan #racist #fascist #xenophobic #Hindu #Supremacist #Modi #BJP

"Mr. Modi’s rule represents the most devastating, and perhaps final, defeat of India’s noble postcolonial ambition to create a moral world order. It turns out that the racist imperialism Du Bois despised can resurrect itself even among its former victims: There can be English rule without the Englishman. India’s claims to exceptionalism appear to have been as unfounded as America’s own." --- Pankaj Mishra

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/11/opinion/india-70-partition-pankaj-mishra.html

India at 70, and the Passing of Another Illusion

By PANKAJ MISHRA
AUG. 11, 2017

August 15, 1947, deserved to be remembered, the African-American writer W.E.B. Du Bois argued, “as the greatest historical date” of modern history. It was the day India became independent from British rule, and Du Bois believed the event was of “greater significance” than even the establishment of democracy in Britain, the emancipation of slaves in the United States or the Russian Revolution. The time “when the white man, by reason of the color of his skin, can lord it over colored people” was finally drawing to a close.

It is barely remembered today that India’s freedom heralded the liberation, from Tuskegee to Jakarta, of a majority of the world’s population from the degradations of racist imperialism. India’s first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, claimed that there had been nothing “more horrible” in human history than the days when millions of Africans “were carried away in galleys as slaves to America and elsewhere.” As he said in a resonant speech on Aug. 15, 1947, long ago India had made a “tryst with destiny,” and now, by opening up a broad horizon of human emancipation, “we shall redeem our pledge.”

But India, which turns 70 next week, seems to have missed its appointment with history. A country inaugurated by secular freedom fighters is presently ruled by religious-racial supremacists. More disturbing still than this mutation are the continuities between those early embodiments of postcolonial virtue and their apparent betrayers today.

Du Bois would have been heartbroken to read the joint statement that more than 40 African governments released in April, denouncing “xenophobic and racial” attacks on Africans in India and asking the United Nations Human Rights Council to investigate. The rise in hate crimes against Africans is part of a sinister trend that has accelerated since the Hindu nationalist Narendra Modi came to power in 2014.

Another of its bloodcurdling manifestations is the lynching of Muslims suspected of eating or storing beef. Others include assaults on couples who publicly display affection and threats of rape against women on social media by the Hindu supremacists’ troll army. Mob frenzy in India today is drummed up by jingoistic television anchors and vindicated, often on Twitter, by senior politicians, businessmen, army generals and Bollywood stars.

Hindu nationalists have also come together to justify India’s intensified military occupation of Muslim-majority Kashmir, as well as a nationwide hunt for enemies: an ever-shifting and growing category that includes writers, liberal intellectuals, filmmakers who work with Pakistani actors and ordinary citizens who don’t stand up when the national anthem is played in cinemas. The new world order — just, peaceful, equal — that India’s leaders promised at independence as they denounced their former Western masters’ violence, greed and hypocrisy is nowhere in sight.
 
.
Mr Haq I mostly agree with your OPs. But this I can't. I wish Pakistan elite had "colonized" minds. If they did they would act and behave like the Western ruling elite. Do they? No they don't. Pakistani ruling elite is not colonized. Japanese, Korean, Chinese and to degree Turkish ruling elite is "occidentalized".

Our elite is oriental to the core but with a veneer of colonization. Who do they act like? I don't see them acting likinf British ruling class? I don't see a Jeremy Corbyn or a Labour Party or even a Cameron of the Tory party in them. I see oriental Moghul and eastern autocracy. Simple as that. I see Moghul Kings and princelings with their courtiers and camp followers. I don't see democrats. I don't see any competent hardworking administrators. I see the same type who were ruling Asia when the Briitish came and took over the entire place because we were ruled by incompetent, corrupt, power hungry despots, lazy lecherous class.
They who rule the Western nations are not sincere to their people. In this regard Pakistani elites are the same.
Sure there are exceptions like Corbyn but the elites wish to get rid of him.
 
.
People who fight for their independence, know the value of independence.
Americans fought for their independence they knew the value of independence. Right after independence they started making their own ways.

Thanks to Third Reich in Germany, the Govt in London was too weak to control her far away colonies and only after little pressure, London had to announce so called independence. But Raj ensured and trained the people, that when they left Subcontinent, power circles were full of their mental slaves.

Today Pakistanis are living in more severe and ruthless kind of salivary. They are slaves of salves. Each and every institution existed in Raj's era, is proud of it's colonial history, including armed forces, and not to forget about Pakistan Penal Code 1860 in Pakistani courts, though there was no Pakistan in 1860.

That's why when speaker of Pakistan's national assembly met the Queen. He proudly said, your majesty we are still your loyal subjects. A foreign minister, Hina Rabbani Khar was proudly presenting a man from British high commission the gifts and awards from Raj to her ancestors.
You can see videos of your leader walking like commoner on London's streets and same man between escort of 20 to 30 police vehicles in Pakistan. Hato, Bacho, side per ho jao, rasta chor do Ghulam kaoum.... ...British Raj ka Ghulam guzar raha he road sey.

Did he actually say that? Don't people know about this? That should cause an uproar and he should have been dismissed immediately.

Pakistan should do a massive reform and change all of the institutions before independence. Create its own system, maybe borrowing from the best around the world, but its own system.

Brofessor sb,

Mughals did not loot their people.

The Mughals didnt "loot" their people in the sense of "taking wealth out of the country" because they couldnt. Where could they have taken their loot-to Uzbekistan? from where they were booted out in the first place?

Regards

You read too much books written by the british. I just love this indian mentality.

Indian mentality- Turkish rulers/or muslims as they say who ruled before british are looters, destroyers etc.

British- no word- silence


Facts- British killed more than millions of people in that region or india as we call it now, was looting everything and using all of the resources so the queen can sit in england and sip the best tea.

Look at all the architercture and buildings, beatiful Taj Mahal made during Turk rulers.

Shah Jahan had exchanged ambassadors and documents with the Murad IV, it was through these exchanges led by the Mughal ambassador Sayyid Muhiuddin and his counterpart the Ottoman ambassador Arsalan Agha, that Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan received Mimar Yusuf, Isa Muhammad Effendi and Ismail Effendi, two Turkish architects and students of the famous Koca Mimar Sinan Agha. Both of them later comprised among the Mughal team that would design and build the Taj Mahal.
 
.
We need another 30-40 years of interruptible democracy if we want "Leaders" only than we will be able to get rid of this colonial mindset.
People who fight for their independence, know the value of independence.
Americans fought for their independence they knew the value of independence. Right after independence they started making their own ways.

Thanks to Third Reich in Germany, the Govt in London was too weak to control her far away colonies and only after little pressure, London had to announce so called independence. But Raj ensured and trained the people, that when they left Subcontinent, power circles were full of their mental slaves.

Today Pakistanis are living in more severe and ruthless kind of salivary. They are slaves of salves. Each and every institution existed in Raj's era, is proud of it's colonial history, including armed forces, and not to forget about Pakistan Penal Code 1860 in Pakistani courts, though there was no Pakistan in 1860.

That's why when speaker of Pakistan's national assembly met the Queen. He proudly said, your majesty we are still your loyal subjects. A foreign minister, Hina Rabbani Khar was proudly presenting a man from British high commission the gifts and awards from Raj to her ancestors.
You can see videos of your leader walking like commoner on London's streets and same man between escort of 20 to 30 police vehicles in Pakistan. Hato, Bacho, side per ho jao, rasta chor do Ghulam kaoum.... ...British Raj ka Ghulam guzar raha he road sey.
Great post man :tup: our people don't give Adolf Hitler the credit for their independence he deserves your post is completely on point we couldn't even change the marching style of our armies after British left.
 
.
Here's a review of Sashi Tharoor's
Mr Riaz I am sorry I disagree with you. Tharoor is himself a "inglorious basket" is a Pakistan hater to boot. I do not want to deviate thos thread but I have zero confidence in claims he makes or the notion that everything was hunky dory until the British came along. There is a industry out there that is feeding on British guilt and at the same time is peddling a very India-centric narrative.

It goes something like this. There was one united India living in peace and unity. All the Indians were prosperous and living in harmoney with each. Diversity was celebrated in a land of plenty. Along came the evil British. They divided and conquered. The plundered the country. India became a land of poverty and disunity. The once united communties living together in eternal peace fractured and became eternal enemies.

Gender violence increased as misogny took root because British sponsored fuedual class with land grants. Religious divide was encourgaded as part of "divide and rule". Great Indian industry shrunk and India became a disjointed, begger nation, divided, poverty stricken and at war with itself. India was a superpower which had been turned into a broken pauper.


Really? To begin with if I wanted to study on crime in Rajanpur District in Pakistan with a look at economic factors I would have hell of a job. I would struggle to get hold of accurate statistics for crime and economic activity in that district. This is despite the existence of Federal Statistics Office GOP., and FB-Revenue who are manadated to keept tabs on variables in question. We all know the utter unreliability of records in Pakistann. We even had to use the army to carry such a basic thing as census.

Yet Tharoor writes and talks as if he had records from Moghul times prior to British arrival that are mandated by the Medieval World Bank or some Moghul equivalent of FBR. The fact is records of most things were sketchy to say the least before British arrival.So how someone can write books and make amazing claims is beyond me unless he has access to time machine.

I can certainly tell you the peoples of present day Pakistan benefited enormously from British Raj. Indeed there would have been no Pakistan without the British Raj. One look at the irrigation system, the army, the rail system should be enough to tell us that.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom