Pak Army isn't capable of fighting and Bajwa's Kashmir deal with India

[nomi007]

Still no FIR has been registered against Hamid Mir Jaffer.
Its mean Na maloom Afrad are behind him.

 

[HAIDER]

Still no FIR has been registered against Hamid Mir Jaffer.
Its mean Na maloom Afrad are behind him.

Hamid Mir is scared ....didn't you see today in Mohammad Malik show.

 

[ghazi52]

,.,,.,.

 

[Chandragupt Maurya]

Army + Air force + navy combined came to 35,833 personnel in East Pakistan...

Bengalis did not have arms, yet they kept fighting, ready to fight till the last Bengali. Three million Bengalis sacrificed their lives to free Bangladesh, none of them surrendered. The same is true for the Taliban who chose to fight against the USA but did not surrender, and the Vietnamese who did not surrender before the USA or China. Indians never surrender. This surrendering trait is something very unique to the Pakistani Punjabi race, which has been present in them for the last 800 years. The Pakistani Punjabi race surrendered before Islamic invaders and accepted Islam, while the rest of India fought bravely and remained Hindu, even during the British era. During the mutiny of 1857, it was the Pakistani Punjabi race that surrendered, while the rest of India kept fighting.

 

[agamdilawari]

Army + Air force + navy combined came to 35,833 personnel in East Pakistan...

Not ours is it ?

 

[Goritoes]

PA lost their marbles long time ago, they can surely kill Journalists and harass kids on Tiktok but fighting is beyond them, now they are aadi of Sharab/shabab/Kabab.

 

[Khanivore]

It could be a bait for India to underestimate Pakistan's capability. People don't think anymore.

 

[General Dong]

It could be a bait for India to underestimate Pakistan's capability. People don't think anymore

5th Generation warfare!!! LOL faujeets are no different than patwari's, great at creating diversions and pulling BS out of their asses!

 

[Tamerlane]

View attachment 926165

Not ours is it ?

The rest were civilians.

 

[ziaulislam]

Imran Khan freed Abhinandan to win a Nobel prize.

Bajwa is being made a scapegoat.

Abhinand ka achaar dalna tha..??? Bhai prisoner war key jitney bayzati Pakistanio ney key uskey misaal nahi miltey lol


Bechary key naak tu awaam ney Thor deya tha..rahi sahi qasar Hindustan walon key ajeeb o ghariab qiso ney otaar deya

View attachment 926165

Not ours is it ?

Oh bahi kabi mard be bano idhar o na...har dafa bengalio key karnama kayon sunatey hu

Barry sharm key baat hey kh nana sa choza Pakistan adhay Kashmir ko pakar key bayta hey

 

[Tornado23]

Bengalis did not have arms, yet they kept fighting, ready to fight till the last Bengali. Three million Bengalis sacrificed their lives to free Bangladesh, none of them surrendered. The same is true for the Taliban who chose to fight against the USA but did not surrender, and the Vietnamese who did not surrender before the USA or China. Indians never surrender. This surrendering trait is something very unique to the Pakistani Punjabi race, which has been present in them for the last 800 years. The Pakistani Punjabi race surrendered before Islamic invaders and accepted Islam, while the rest of India fought bravely and remained Hindu, even during the British era. During the mutiny of 1857, it was the Pakistani Punjabi race that surrendered, while the rest of India kept fighting.

They were a total of 250,000 MB who all had arms, and another 150,000 Indian soldiers. It's no secret the Indians provided arms en mass to the MB. That's just a straight up lie from you alongside the 3 million myth. It's utterly impossible for 35,833 soldiers +11,000 razakars to have killed 3 million Bangladeshis within such a short amount of time.


The truth was, Pakistan was heavily outnumbered and outgunned but held on fighting for a good 2 weeks, inflicting more casualties on the enemy than they took themselves. There was no 90,000 soldiers fighting. Your own General Manekshaw commented on this saying Indian enjoyed a 50:1 advantage (hyperbole to highlight the numerical advantage India enjoyed over Pakistan in East Pakistan).

View attachment 926165

Not ours is it ?

Post stamps can't be used as evidence for anything. That's like me saying the Queen of England (RIP) is still alive because I have her post stamp from 20 years ago.

 

[Chandragupt Maurya]

They were a total of 250,000 MB who all had arms, and another 150,000 Indian soldiers. It's no secret the Indians provided arms en mass to the MB. That's just a straight up lie from you alongside the 3 million myth. It's utterly impossible for 35,833 soldiers +11,000 razakars to have killed 3 million Bangladeshis within such a short amount of time.


The truth was, Pakistan was heavily outnumbered and outgunned but held on fighting for a good 2 weeks, inflicting more casualties on the enemy than they took themselves. There was no 90,000 soldiers fighting. Your own General Manekshaw commented on this saying Indian enjoyed a 50:1 advantage (hyperbole to highlight the numerical advantage India enjoyed over Pakistan in East Pakistan).


Post stamps can't be used as evidence for anything. That's like me saying the Queen of England (RIP) is still alive because I have her post stamp from 20 years ago.

The West sided with Pakistan and continues to support it over India. One can see this by looking at the inventories of the Indian Air Force (IAF) and the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) in 1971. Around 60-70% of the IAF's imported jets were of Russian origin, while the PAF's jets were top-of-the-line American jets. The West created Pakistan and nurtured it to be used against India, the Soviet Union, Iran, and sometimes even China. Few people know that China did not help Pakistan in 1971 because Pakistan allowed the USA to conduct espionage on China using its territory in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh).

The reason why India has always defeated Pakistan is due to the sheer will and tenacity of the Indian state. Contrary to popular opinion, India is actually a very hard state when it comes to territorial matters. Since 1947, whenever the borders have changed in South Asia, India has always expanded its territory while Pakistan has shrunk.

 

[PanzerKiel]

The West sided with Pakistan and continues to support it over India. One can see this by looking at the inventories of the Indian Air Force (IAF) and the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) in 1971. Around 60-70% of the IAF's imported jets were of Russian origin, while the PAF's jets were top-of-the-line American jets. The West created Pakistan and nurtured it to be used against India, the Soviet Union, Iran, and sometimes even China. Few people know that China did not help Pakistan in 1971 because Pakistan allowed the USA to conduct espionage on China using its territory in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh).

The reason why India has always defeated Pakistan is due to the sheer will and tenacity of the Indian state. Contrary to popular opinion, India is actually a very hard state when it comes to territorial matters. Since 1947, whenever the borders have changed in South Asia, India has always expanded its territory while Pakistan has shrunk.

Try googling around.

Regarding your remark of PAF top of the line US fighters....
F86 Sabre made it's first flight in 1947 while Mig 21 was operationalized in 1959. Shows who was having top of the line fighters.

Instead of few, MANY People, of whom you are not included of course, know that China helped us greatly after 1965 war. Giving equipment of almost 5 whole infantry divisions, 750 type 59 tanks before 1971, 950 tanks after 1971, anti aircraft guns for almost two whole air defence divisions...

Also, try qualifying your statement about india defeating Pakistan.... If yes, why do we all see Pakistan still on the face of world map, that too as a nuclear power.... Or leaving Pakistan intact, not taking it over and allowing it to become a nuclear power and a constant thorn in your side was all part of your magnificent strategic plan.

The West sided with Pakistan and continues to support it over India. One can see this by looking at the inventories of the Indian Air Force (IAF) and the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) in 1971. Around 60-70% of the IAF's imported jets were of Russian origin, while the PAF's jets were top-of-the-line American jets. The West created Pakistan and nurtured it to be used against India, the Soviet Union, Iran, and sometimes even China. Few people know that China did not help Pakistan in 1971 because Pakistan allowed the USA to conduct espionage on China using its territory in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh).

The reason why India has always defeated Pakistan is due to the sheer will and tenacity of the Indian state. Contrary to popular opinion, India is actually a very hard state when it comes to territorial matters. Since 1947, whenever the borders have changed in South Asia, India has always expanded its territory while Pakistan has shrunk.

Regarding Pakistan helping US for espionage against China.... Well it's laughable. Try Google for Nanda Devi, and it's associated CIA program... And you'll come to know how India helped US for espionage against China.

 

[ghazi52]

.,.,

 

[IceCold]

Establishment also has a stake

I would say the establishment has a bigger stake in this as otherwise how would they justify keeping around 4% of the GDP to themselves in comparison to India which is taking 2.66% as of 2021?
India still has to worry about China, what will be our excuse? Hence even if the politicians agree, the military will have another regime change operation before they will let this golden goose walk away.