What's new

Operation Rah-e-Nijat

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kindly go back & read your statement, you said 100% pakistani's agree that the suicide bombings & insurgency is due to drone strikes, which i don't agree with. I did not said i agree with drone strikes.

We all know very well insurgency started after drones attackes.What is other reason of insurgency ?

Are they wanted seperate home land? , Power? , Money? if not then what else is their demand?

Why insurgency was not started in 60 years before drone attacks ?

Do little brain storming you can find the answer :D
 
Allah don't help those who don't help themselves...

The more money will bring more corruption into pakistan (which can be already seen).. and pakistan will remain as so.. thanks to the people like you.. who don't have guts to think of something other then loan and something..


Hmmm.... now what was all that about? :undecided:


Best to end it here. Bye.
 
We all know very well insurgency started after drones attackes.What is other reason of insurgency ?

Are they wanted seperate home land? , Power? , Money? if not then what else is their demand?

Why insurgency was not started in 60 years before drone attacks ?

Do little brain storming you can find the answer :D

The insurgency started when the PA deployed to stop cross border insurgent movement. However, given the ideology of the Taliban, it could be argued that the Taliban would have eventually taken on the state in any case, and tried to expand into the settled districts in a bid to impose their ideology on all of Pakistan. They sincerely believe that Pakistan's judiciary, democracy etc. is 'un-Islamic' and that it must be changed to a system that conforms with the Taliban interpretation of Islam.

There was also a huge spike in violence after the Lal Masjid operation, and while it is your right to criticize the way the operation was handled, it is also the GoP's right to handle such issues as it sees fit. Carrying out suicide bombings, attacking troops etc. is not justified regardless of how much the Taliban disagreed with the Lal Masjid Operation.
 
washingtonpost.com


A Showdown In Waziristan


Tackling a Taliban Haven With Guns and Money


By David Ignatius
Thursday, October 1, 2009

WANA, Pakistan -- The zigzag trip to this garrison town deep in the tribal area of South Waziristan tells a story that's more than a century old: The fierce Mehsud tribe and its allies are a law unto themselves in these rugged mountains, and wise travelers steer clear of their strongholds.

The Mehsud warriors have defied the British Raj, the Pakistani army and lately the Americans and their high-tech Predator drones. Since 2001, they have offered a haven to al-Qaeda and the Taliban and, in the process, made Waziristan one of the most dangerous spots on Earth.

A new battle for control of Waziristan is coming, as the Pakistani military prepares a ground offensive in the Mehsud areas against Taliban and al-Qaeda fighters. The army has code-named the operation "Rahe Nijat," which the commander here translates loosely as "The Way to Get Rid of Them." The assault could start within the next month.

I traveled here from Peshawar in a single-engine Pakistani army Mashaq trainer. The route was not a straight line, which would have taken us over Mehsud territory. That's too risky, even at 8,500 feet. So the young pilot steered a dogleg course during the nearly two-hour flight, making a sharp right over the ancient princely city of Tank.

We could see in the distance the regions where al-Qaeda has taken refuge. It's an almost lunar landscape of dry, trackless peaks with a sparse stubble of trees along the ridges. If you were looking for a place to hide, so rugged and inhospitable that outsiders would tremble at entering, Waziristan would be it. In the days of the Raj, maps of Waziristan were mostly blank; even the intrepid British explorers usually stayed away.

We landed at Wana under a hot sun, in a valley surrounded by sawtooth mountains. To the west, about 20 miles distant, is Afghanistan. A hint of the violent life here is that family compounds are built as little forts, with steep walls and gun turrets at the corners. On Muslim feast days, it's said, the locals have shooting competitions.

The town has two military outposts: a Pakistani army camp and the local headquarters of the Frontier Corps, the tribal force that, in theory, keeps the peace in Waziristan and the six other districts of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas, or FATA.

In recent decades, the government's authority here disappeared. The Pakistani army tried unsuccessfully to regain control in 2007 and 2008, and is said to have struck a secret peace deal with Baitullah Mehsud, then the toughest fighter of the clan and the leader of the Pakistani Taliban.

Wana is relatively calm today because it's controlled not by the Mehsuds but by the rival Waziri tribe, which in the past year has made peace with the government. The Pakistani army worked with the Waziri "maliks," as the tribal leaders are known, to rebuild their power. The government's campaign got a boost in August when a U.S. Predator attack killed Baitullah Mehsud.

Maj. Gen. Khalid Rabbani, the army commander here, is waiting for the ground battle to begin. "Enough is enough," he says of the Mehsud chiefs and their allies. He's confident that his troops can clear the area, but he worries whether economic development will come fast enough to hold it.

The army has been squeezing South Waziristan for two months now, blocking all roads into the Mehsud area, and Rabbani says the insurgents are running out of food and fuel. About 80,000 noncombatants have left, leaving an estimated 10,000 to 20,000 hard-core fighters.

The Pakistani strategy for rebuilding control here might be termed "back to the future." Once the Taliban's hold is broken, the army will work with the maliks to restore the old tribal power structure. The maliks will get stipends for their "jirgas," or governing councils, and for a network of sentries, known as "khassadars." The maliks will also revive local militias that can defend against insurgents.

A beefed-up Frontier Corps will give the system some muscle. In Peshawar, I visited the Frontier Corps headquarters, housed in a fortress called the Bala Hissar that dates to the Raj. The tribal recruits still dress in their traditional tunics and baggy pants, but their officers are getting 21st-century counterinsurgency training from about 80 U.S. Special Forces troops at a base nearby.

The burly commander of the Frontier Corps, Maj. Gen. Tariq Khan, sums up his philosophy of tribal politics this way: "If you want to be somebody, you must have a bigger caliber and a bigger wallet." Guns and money are on Pakistan's side in the coming showdown with the Mehsuds and their brutal friends, but this is one tough enemy.

davidignatius@washpost.com
 
Dear All-Green:

Your post is both thoughtful and logical, and perhaps represents the “mainstream” point of view. Mainstream doctrine though has landed us is serious difficulties as regards our national integrity, being caught in never ending cycle of violence with no real end in sight. I do appreciate that the cycle of violence unleashed by TTP has spread fear and instability.

I do agree that Gen Musharraf era was marked by relative economic stability and a few infrastructure projects, most notable amongst them being the Mekran Coastal highway. But the tight monetarist approach of Shaukat Aziz resulted in high foreign exchange reserves, and a gradual slide of about 32% of the population below the poverty line, a whooping 8% increase in about 8 years. The Telecom boom however was a global paradigm change; a la railways or aviation, cell phone penetration recorded about the same level growth as Pakistan in Benin, Togo, and Malawi as well.

I beg to differ with your opinion in a few lines:

1. During the Zia era we emerged as the Theykedars of Islam and Jehad; and now we have emrged as the Theykedars of Global War on Terror. In both cases we did the dirty work and took on enormous losses; virtually for peanuts. We just never learnt to negotiate a fair deal. In fact Zia’s record is somewhat better because the PPP based purchasing power on an average Pakistani was by far higher.
2. Now we are worrying about COIN, against a full fledged insurgency that afflicts most of the landmass of Pakistan (Baluchistan included). I have reasons to belive that this insurgency situation was created during the Musharraf era as a money spinning exercise to show the western world that we too are somehow a frontline bulwark state against “Terrorism”. OK!!!!! If we really have to wage war on our own soil, lets do it for the right price!.
3. The price of any commodity or service depends on its perceived value in the eyes of customer (US in this case). Pakistan’s support is absolutely critical, and a demand for a 15% outlay is not unreasonable.

Instead the US found it a lot cheaper to strike a deal with the leadership (both Civil and the military); and pay us small morsels as “reimbursables”. We are caught in a pretty shameful but comic situation:
 PA has to raise invoices for the bullets spent, mavericks fired and fuel used in each operation.
 US demands proof of effectiveness; and we have to show them statistics on extremists killed; and “high ranking Al-Quaeda” roasted alive.
 Then the US covers the “score” deficit through a few more Drone Strikes!
 To add a bot of realism to the action, we throw in a couple of million refugees (IDP’s).
 In the end the US delays our payments and send a few more top commanders to tell us to “do more”.

The only positive thing to come out of this is to see pictures of bearded fellas stripped to their groins and languishing in jails under the watchful eyes of Army guards. A bigger thrill however is the display of catches of arms being displayed to give the nation a sense of Victory.
 
Dear Xeric:

I fully support the US War against Terror, and everything American because they are the Master race. But there are doubts within the US as to what constitutes “Victory” in this never ending conflict. Its a bit of a Phoney war, but nevertheless a great money making opportunity.

What I am against is the rather comically enthusiastic way in which Pakistani civilian and military leadership has taken “ownership” of this war by bringing it to its own soil.

Now all eyes are glued on Waziristan; waiting for the gory action to start. With about 80% of the population displaced, now is the time to hit the 20% infidel Taliban entrenched in the area.

The most alarming part in the story is the misconception of our Army Commanders “ Once the Taliban's hold is broken, the army will work with the maliks to restore the old tribal power structure”. "If you want to be somebody, you must have a bigger caliber and a bigger wallet."

Tribal areas and Swat / Bajaur appear to be locked in a time warp; but politically they have developed over the last decades. The era of Muajeb Khwar levies died its natural death a long time ago.
 
LAHORE: “”Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Ashfaq Kayani has said Pakistan will not allow US drones to attack Balochistan, a private TV channel reported on Tuesday””.

Such a statement is no worthy of the Commander of our Armed forces, with the direct responsibility to defend Pakistan’s territory against external attack. In other words he is saying that Drone Strikes on FATA / Waziristan are happening with his permission!!.

Does the US actually need his permission to strike Baluchistan?
 
I feel saddened many times when read the naive kind of thoughts & posts of some of the members, specially with Pakistani flags under their names.

Their understanding of Pakistan & its problems & the suffering of its people is far far away from the truth.

Such remarks by them are an insult & disrespect to the thousands of civilians & soldiers martyred at the hands of these barbarians (on whose side such members are) & their parents who have lost their loved ones.

Feel ashamed of such Pakistanis.
 
No 385/2009-ISPR Dated: October 1, 2009
Rawalpindi - October 1, 2009:

COAS Visit North Waziristan Agency

The Chief of Army Staff (COAS), General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani today had a day long visit to North Waziristan Agency to spend time with field commanders and troops deployed in the area. He was briefed about the training and operational matters by respective Commanders. COAS informally interacted with the troops and appreciated their high morale.

COAS later pinned the gallantry awards on officers and men who displayed great acts of valour and bravery. Earlier, on arrival, COAS was received by Lieutenant General Muhammad Masood Aslam, Corps Commander.




Chief of Army Staff, General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani meeting with troops during his visit to North Waziristan Agency on Thursday. (01-10-2009) - Photo ISPR
 
No 384/2009-ISPR Dated: October 1, 2009
Rawalpindi - October 1, 2009:

1. Search and clearance operations are continuing in Swat and Malakand.

2. Swat

a. Security forces conducted a raid on a tip off in Toprai near Gat. During the raid on a house, one of the 2 terrorists present inside who was wearing a suicide jacket exploded himself. Resultantly, 2 terrorists were killed and 2 soldiers were injured in the action.

b. Security forces coducted search operation at Garhi near Shamozai and apprehended 4 suspects.

c. A terrorist voluntarily surrendered himself to security forces at Dagai.

d. Security forces coducted search operation at Kalla Kalle and apprehended 2 terrorists while 3 terrorists voluntarily surrendered themselves to security forces.

3. Relief Activities. 306,350 cash cards have been distributed amongst the IDPs of Malakand.
 
Dear Xeric:

I fully support the US War against Terror, and everything American because they are the Master race. But there are doubts within the US as to what constitutes “Victory” in this never ending conflict. Its a bit of a Phoney war, but nevertheless a great money making opportunity.
First you need to understand that though we are being 'lead' by the US, but we are not owned by them, so whatever this 'Master' or ours would tell/ask us to do wouldn't be done/provided unnecessarily.

Dont forget we are not Afghanistan or Iraq

What I am against is the rather comically enthusiastic way in which Pakistani civilian and military leadership has taken “ownership” of this war by bringing it to its own soil.

This war was never ours, it started as a war that was superimposed on us and we had to fight it for some else, but the ground realities had been such that it was made our war. We couldn't help it. May be, you can call it a failure at the State level or the failure to see the future, but today the position is that it is very much our own war.

You are welcome to blame just anyone (to include Musharraf) for this 'transformation' (it's altogether a different debate and dont want to get into it in this thread)

Now all eyes are glued on Waziristan; waiting for the gory action to start. With about 80% of the population displaced, now is the time to hit the 20% infidel Taliban entrenched in the area.
Whatever!

Gory or sanguinary, we no more care, but i have a question for you, do we have a choice? Or may be there can be an alternative that we ofcourse are eager to listen, may be you can help us out.

The most alarming part in the story is the misconception of our Army Commanders “ Once the Taliban's hold is broken, the army will work with the maliks to restore the old tribal power structure”. "If you want to be somebody, you must have a bigger caliber and a bigger wallet."
Care to elaborate?

May be i am missing something, please.

Tribal areas and Swat / Bajaur appear to be locked in a time warp; but politically they have developed over the last decades. The era of Muajeb Khwar levies died its natural death a long time ago.

It's totally a separate debate, i'll love to discuss it if you take it to that levies/FC/Police 'empowerment' thread.
 
Xeric & AgNoStIc MuSliM Sir, no matter what you tell to our such distinguished members (referred to in one of my posts) about the ground realities & facts, their minds are made up & they won't change their thinking that this war on terror has now become a war of Pakistan.

The fact about the knowledge of our such members can be judged from the fact that one of them used to write Swat as SWAT thinking it as an abbreviation just like FATA & one of them from his recent posts thinks Swat / Bajaur are different then the tribal areas, without knowing that Bajaur comes into FATA, while calling Swat's political development has been in last few decades without knowing the history of Swat & that it is not a tribal area like FATA. From their talk its clear that they think that the Swat insurgency is due Afghanistan without knowing it has no border with it nor any link to it.

This clearly showing the knowledge possessed, if such is the caliber of our such distinguished members what else kind of remarks are you gonna expect out of them other then supporting their Taliban Brothers & insulting & disrespecting the thousands civilians & soldiers martyred in suicide bombings, having their throats cut & slaughtered, martyred by their bullets & bombs.

I feel sorry for such people who come here & talk as if Pakistan is doing all this on its own will without knowing how the people of Pakistan are suffering at the hands of these barbarians.
 
Pakistan to Target Taliban’s ‘Epicenter’

PESHAWAR, Pakistan — After fighting peripheral wars against militants for the last several years, the military is poised to open a campaign in coming days against the Taliban’s main stronghold in Pakistan’s tribal areas, South Waziristan, according to senior military and security officials.

For three months, the military has been drawing up plans, holding in-depth deliberations and studying past operations in the area, where previous campaigns ended in failure and resulted in some of the military’s highest level of casualties.

Even so, military officials said they expected stiff resistance once again in an area that one senior military official called the “epicenter” of the Taliban in Pakistan. It has also become a key base for Al Qaeda. “This is where we will be fighting the toughest of all battles,” the official said.

He and other officials did not want to be identified while discussing confidential preparations for the campaign. But they said the military now seemed ready to try to re-enter the area, having decided it could wait no longer. “If we don’t take the battle to them, they will bring the battle to us,” the official said.

The past two operations in South Waziristan ended up with the military bogged down and suing for peace, resulting in a series of accords that ultimately strengthened the hand of the militants.

An operation in January 2004 led to a peace agreement by that April, followed by another on Feb. 5, 2005, with Baitullah Mehsud, the leader of the Pakistani Taliban. But with few if any enforcement mechanisms, the accords were never sturdy and allowed the militants to regroup and tighten their hold on the region.

In late January 2008, the military launched another operation, called Zalzala, or Earthquake, with the declared goal of dislodging Mr. Mehsud. The operation did not cause even a tremor, and only 12 days later, authorities were struggling to revive the peace accord.

With the failure of the operation went any pretense of state authority in Waziristan, with the government in effect ceding control to emboldened militants.

Military officials hope that things will be different this time, having now taken on militant strongholds, each in their turn, in recent years in other areas: first in Bajaur, then in Mohmand, and, most recently, in the Swat Valley. Perhaps most critical was the elimination of Mr. Mehsud, whose death in an American drone strike in August helped fracture the Pakistani Taliban, also known as Tehrik-i-Taliban. “The Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan as a monolithic organization remains no more,” a security official said.

Since June, Waziristan has been under an economic blockade, with thousands of army soldiers sitting on the fringes of the area, waiting for orders from the military high command to move in.

Some argue that the military should have mounted an operation immediately after Mr. Mehsud’s death. “As far as we are concerned, the operation should have been launched three months ago,” said a senior government official. “Baitullah is dead and his group seems to be in some form of disarray. And this provides the best opportunity to go after them.”

But a senior military official said that, in addition to needing to wait for the forces and resources to be available, the military wanted to see what would be the repercussions of Mr. Mehsud’s death.

“We thought that Baitullah’s death would unravel the Mehsud militant group and galvanize the tribe to stand up to the people they have suffered from,” the official said. “It didn’t happen.”

Now there is a sense within the military establishment that the situation in South Waziristan cannot be allowed to perpetuate. The blockade is nearly three months old, and the military, which has been conducting limited airstrikes, is running out of targets.

The Pakistani Army chief, Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, described Waziristan as an intelligence black hole. “We have to move in,” he said recently.

A large number of civilians have already relocated to Dera Ismail Khan and Tank, both in North-West Frontier Province, giving the army a relatively free hand to mount an operation.

But all agree that the battle ahead is formidable. Questions remain whether the army will be able to hold territory and sustain operations in a tough and treacherous terrain, where snows arrive in late November.

The Mehsud militants not only have the advantage of familiarity with the area, but their numbers — estimated at 6,000 to 7,000 — have been thickened by foreign elements, in particular Uzbeks, who have a reputation as ferocious fighters.

Then there is the Haqqani network, which uses the area as a base for its operations in Afghanistan, and there is Al Qaeda, which depends heavily on the Mehsud fighting force. “They will defend their power base and fight till the very last,” one officer said.

Link : http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/02/world/asia/02pstan.html?_r=1&ref=asia
 
DAWN.COM | Front Page | Battle for Waziristan looms

Battle for Waziristan looms
By Ismail Khan
Friday, 02 Oct, 2009 | 06:35 AM PST

PESHAWAR, Oct 1: After fighting brief skirmishes against militants, the Pakistan Army plans to unfold in the next few days what military officials characterise as the mother of all battles in South Waziristan, senior military and security officials said on Thursday.

“If we don’t take the battle to them, they will bring the battle to us,” a senior military official said of the militants. “The epicentre of the behemoth called the Taliban lies in South Waziristan, and this is where we will be fighting the toughest of all battles.”

For three months, the military has been drawing up plans, holding in-depth deliberations and carrying out studies on past expeditions to make what seems to be the last grand stand against Pakistani Taliban in the Mehsud heartland a success.

“We are ready. The environment is ready,” the senior officer said. But military officials also admit Waziristan will not be an easy battle. “It will not be a walkover. This is going to be casualty-intensive hard fighting. The nation will have to bear the pain,” said another officer.

Already this past summer, the military has lost more than three hundred of its soldiers in the Swat valley. One out of ten was officer — the highest soldier-to-officer casualty ratio in any war, skirmish or operation in the world, a spokesman for the military said.

By the military’s own reckoning, the past two operations against the tribal militants in South Waziristan ended in failure. The Jan 2004 operation led to the infamous Shakai peace agreement in April 2004, followed by another agreement with the now-dead Tehrik-i-Taliban chief Baitullah Mehsud on Feb 5, 2005.

In late January last year, the military launched Operation Zalzala with the stated goal of dislodging Baitullah Mehsud from his stronghold. The operation did not cause even a tremor and only 12 days later, were authorities struggling to revive the dead Sararogha agreement.

With that went even the pretence of any state authority as control of the volatile region was ceded to now emboldened militants.

Much water has flowed under the bridge since then, military officials add. Militants have been driven out of Swat; with additional forces available Bajaur is just heading there and Mohmand is close to being cleared.

“The Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan as a monolithic organisation remains no more,” a security official claimed.

The icing on the cake came with the death of Baitullah Mehsud in a drone attack in August. His death complemented the military’s plan that included an economic blockade already in place since June.

Thousands of army soldiers — two divisions — are now sitting on the fringes of the Mehsud mainland waiting for orders from the high command to move in. A debate is raging within some circles whether the military could have mounted an assault shortly after BM’s death. “As far as we are concerned the operation should have been launched three months ago,” a senior government official said.

“Baitullah is dead and his group seems to be in some sort of disarray. And this provides the best opportunity to go after them,” the official said.

“That may have been correct,” acknowledged a senior military official. “We thought that Baitullah’s death would unravel the Mehsud militant group and galvanise the tribe to stand up to the people who have caused them suffering. It didn’t happen,” the official argued.

And one major factor for the delay, according to this official, was also the availability of additional forces and resources. “We have the men and material now and everything is in place,” he added.

With additional force available, the blockade has been made more effective by occupying three strategic heights along Mehsuds’ border with North Waziristan besides virtually sealing all four access points in the battle-zone from Razmak-Makeen, Wana-Ludda, Jandola-Sararogha and Kanigoram-Jandola. Perhaps the only escape route available to the militants now is to the Shawal mountains.

In addition to this, the government has been able to neutralise Commander Nazir Group in Wana, in the Ahmadzai Wazir area of South Waziristan, and Commander Hafiz Gul Bahadur in North Waziristan.

The killing of seventeen militants of the Nazir group, reportedly by pro-Baitullah Uzbek fighters inside Mehsud territory, drove the last nail in the coffin of a pan-Waziristan alliance between the three groups, cobbled together by the late Baitullah last year.

There is a sense within the military establishment that the situation in South Waziristan could not be allowed to drag on. The blockade is nearly three-months old and the military is sitting on the fringes, firing artillery and fighting off attacks from seemingly desperate Mehsud fighters.

Also, the army is running out of targets for air strikes and quick get-in and get-out type surgical strikes due to intelligence problems. Army chief Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani recently described the Mehsud badlands as an intelligence black hole. “We have to move in,” he said.

Military planners hope that by moving in physically, they would be able to garner crucial support from reluctant Mehsud tribesmen to provide intelligence.

Equally useful support in terms of intelligence may also come from Misbahuddin, who leads the anti-Baitullah group formed by Abdullah Mehsud before he was killed. Indeed, Misbahuddin’s group has been on the trail and hunt of Baitullah’s men, either picking them directly or pointing them out to law enforcers in cities as far away as Karachi and Peshawar.

In another boon for the army, a large number of Mehsud tribesmen have already relocated to Dera Ismail Khan and Tank, giving a relatively free hand to the high command to mount a massive operation in an area spread over 2,419 square kilometres.

But all agree that the battle ahead is formidable. Questions remain if the army would be able to hold and sustain the operation in what is widely believed to be a tough and treacherous terrain.

Weather may also play a significant role in shaping up the battle in a place where temperature drops to 20 degrees centigrade below freezing point in winters.

In the Mehsud heartland, snow starts to set in towards the end of November and that may restrict logistic supplies to un-acclimatised troops fighting in an inhospitable territory. But military strategists say the weather problem would hit the militants more than it would hit the troops.The militants have the advantage of knowing their terrain and territory. “It is difficult to dislodge someone holding the high-ground,” acknowledged one officer.

To strengthen their defences, Mehsuds have the support of some two thousand ferocious fighters. The total strength of the Mehsud-Uzbek and non-local Pakistani militant combine is stated to be between six thousand and seven thousand. “It is going to be a battle with the Uzbeks more than anybody else,” the officer said.

And then there is the external element – the Haqqani and Al Qaeda network that is heavily dependent on the Mehsud fighting force. “They will defend their power base and fight to the last man,” the officer remarked.

In line with their tradition, the officer said, the Mehsuds may try and ignite fire elsewhere in Pakistan. Suicide bombing is their most time-proven and lethal weapon.

Already, 71 people have died in six suicide bombings in the NWFP last month. Qari Hussain, the mastermind of suicide bombings in Pakistan, has already issued a chilling warning to unleash his bombers and “inflict pain” to avenge the death of Baitullah and Hakeemullah’s brother.

To slow down any military movement, the militants are believed to have planted improvised explosive devices and fortified their positions. “They are as much ready for the battle as we are,” a senior official maintained.

“Let’s not assume that the battle will be over in three to four days. It may take us three to four weeks. We have done our homework and are ready for the battle. But in the final analysis, it is God’s will that will determine the course of action. And that’s the punch-line,” the official remarked.
 
Pentagon praises Pakistan’s ability to sustain pressure on Taliban

WASHINGTON: The Pentagon on Wednesday acknowledged the Pakistan Army’s ability to sustain pressure against extremist groups along the Afghan border over the last several months. “We have seen great progress by the Pakistani military over the past several months. And we are pleased with that progress,” Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell said. “The issue had always been the willingness and the ability of the Pakistani military to sustain the pressure they needed to put on terrorist groups in their midst. And I think they have shown over the past several months the ability to sustain that pressure and that’s the key to our success in Afghanistan,” he said. Morrell also talked about the problem of cross-border movement by the Taliban and said the US and its allies needed Pakistan’s pressure on the extremists present at the porous Afghan border. “We need the pressure from Pakistan for us ultimately to be successful in Afghanistan, just as the Pakistanis need us and the Afghan military to maintain pressure on the Afghan side of the border, so that the Taliban don’t become stronger in Pakistan,” he said.

app
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom