By SABRINA TAVERNISE and ERIC SCHMITT
Published: November 17, 2009
SARAROGHA, Pakistan This windswept, sand-colored town in the badlands of western Pakistan is empty now, cleared of the militants who once claimed it as their capital. But its brick buildings, intact and thick with dust, tell not of an epic battle, but of sudden flight.
Notes from Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq and other areas of conflict in the post-9/11 era. Go to the Blog »
Related
Brown Vows to Continue War Effort in Afghanistan (November 18, 2009)
Training of Afghan Police by Europe Is Found Lacking (November 18, 2009)
At War: A Scrapbook From the Tribal Areas
A month after the Pakistani military began its push into the Taliban stronghold of South Waziristan, militants appear to have been dispersed, not eliminated, with most simply fleeing. That recurring pattern illustrated the problems facing the Obama administration as it enters its final days of a decision on its strategy for Afghanistan.
Success in this region, in the remote mountains near the Afghan border, could have a direct bearing on how many more American troops are ultimately sent to Afghanistan, and how long they must stay.
Pakistan has shown increased willingness to tackle the problem, launching sweeping operations in the north and west of the country this year, but American officials are still urging it to do more, most recently in a letter from President Obama to Pakistans president, Asif Ali Zardari, over the weekend.
On Tuesday, the military escorted journalists on a tour of the area, where it closely restricts access, showing piles of things they had seized, including weapons, bombs, photos and even a long, curly wig. It all started from here, said Brig. Muhammed Shafiq, the commander here. This is the most important town in South Waziristan.
But lasting success has been elusive, tempered by an agile enemy that has moved easily from one part of the tribal areas to the next and even deeper into Pakistan virtually every time it has been challenged.
American analysts expressed surprise at the relatively light fighting and light Pakistani Army casualties seven soldiers in five days in Sararogha supporting their suspicions that the Taliban fighters from the local Mehsud tribe and the foreign fighters who are their allies, including a large contingent of Uzbeks, have headed north or deeper into the mountains. In comparison, 51 Americans were killed in eight days of fighting in Falluja, Iraq, in 2004.
Thats what bothers me, an American intelligence officer said. Where are they?
The Pakistani military says it has learned from past failures in a region where it lost hundreds of men in fighting before. It spent weeks bombing the area before its 30,000 troops entered. It struck alliances with neighboring tribes.
But the pending campaign was no secret, allowing time for local people and militants to escape.
They are fleeing in all directions, said a senior Pakistani security official, who did not want to be identified while discussing national security issues. The Uzbeks are fleeing to Afghanistan and the north, and the Mehsuds are fleeing to any possible place they can think of.
Even so, the fact that the military now occupies the area is something of a success, analysts say, and American officials have expressed measured praise for the Pakistani operation so far.
The Pakistani Army has done pretty well, and they have learned lessons from the Swat campaign, including the use of close-air support from their fighter jets, said a senior American intelligence official, referring to the armys first offensive this spring.
But big questions remain: How long will the military be able to hold the territory? And once they leave, will the militants simply come back?
Are they really winning the people this is the big question, said Talat Masood, a military analyst and former general in Islamabad, the capital. They have weakened the Taliban tactically, but have they really won the area if the people are not with them?
Winning them over will not be easy. Waziristans largely Pashtun population has been abandoned by the military repeatedly in the past, including in 2005, when, after a peace deal, a military commander called Baitullah Mehsud, the head of the Taliban, a soldier of peace. People who are from this area are still deeply skeptical of the armys intentions.
People want to know: how serious is the military this time? said a military official who asked not to be named in order not to undermine the official position publicly.
The military argues that it is, saying that it has lost 70 soldiers in this operation so far, on top of more than 1,000 killed in the last several years of conflict.
Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas, principle spokesman for the Pakistan military, said that about 50 percent of the Mehsud territory is now under army control, including most major towns and roads, and that the military would soon begin to press into villages where militants were hiding.
Finding a reliable local partner will be difficult. The Taliban and Al Qaeda have ruled the impoverished area for so long that they have altered its social structure, killing hundreds of tribal elders and making it hard for the military to negotiate.
The alliances that the military has struck with neighboring tribal leaders, including Hafiz Gul Bahadur, may also prove problematic. The senior Pakistani security official said Mr. Bahadur was hosting the families of two top Pakistani Taliban leaders.
Some American officials also voiced concern that if and when the Pakistani Army crushes the Mehsuds, it will declare victory and cut more permanent peace deals with other Pakistani militant factions, rather than fighting and defeating them.
Theyve got a huge problem and they dont have it figured out so far, said the first American intelligence officer.
But the Pakistani military argues that as long as the other groups are not attacking the Pakistani Army or state, it would be foolish to draw them into the war, particularly because Pakistan is not confident the United States will be around much longer.
Mr. Masood explained the thinking: You are 10,000 miles away and we are going to live with them, so how can we take on every crook who is hostile to you?
And there is history to overcome. One Pakistani intelligence official pointed to the American abandonment of the region in 1989, after the Soviet Union left Afghanistan. If they leave in haste, like they left in the past, we will be back to the bad old days, the official said. Our jihadis would head back to Afghanistan, reopen training camps, and it will be business as usual.
Sabrina Tavernise reported from Sararogha, Pakistan, and Eric Schmitt from Washington. Ismail Khan contributed reporting from Peshawar, Pakistan.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/18/world/asia/18pstan.html