What's new

No money, no aircraft carrier !

I was talking about the AC mentioned in the article.

Has it dawned on you that 70% to 80% cost of the ACC has already been spent? you think India cannot afford another 20% of the cost? Do you by any chance know what's India's defense budget - also do you know that there are presently 70 - 80 warships under construction in all our shipyards?
 
Has it dawned on you that 70% to 80% cost of the ACC has already been spent? you think India cannot afford another 20% of the cost? Do you by any chance know what's India's defense budget - also do you know that there are presently 70 - 80 warships under construction in all our shipyards?

The article says it is only 30% finished !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Like some Indian said earlier....India need it because of China but Pakistan doesn't need one since India is just next door.

Doesn`t matter what some member might have said. The role of AC is power projection at distance, as defined and used by navies all over. For sure PN would love to target some distant Indian site, thus putting pressure on different spots. Otherwise China is next door to India too, and a larger border than it shares with Pakistan. How does a carrier helps?
 
Like some Indian said earlier....India need it because of China but Pakistan doesn't need one since India is just next door.

The_Fox_and_the_Grapes.jpg
 
Doesn`t matter what some member might have said. The role of AC is power projection at distance, as defined and used by navies all over. For sure PN would love to target some distant Indian site, thus putting pressure on different spots. Otherwise China is next door to India too, and a larger border than it shares with Pakistan. How does a carrier helps?

Unfortunately Tibet is a buffer between the Chinese mainland and India so India needs an AC to get closer to Beijing , Shanghai etc
 
By the time the hull was first floated on december 2011,it displaced over 14000 ton out of the total 40000 ton,which itself is over 35% of the total displacement.
 
Unfortunately Tibet is a buffer between the Chinese mainland and India so India needs an AC to get closer to Beijing , Shanghai etc
alternatively indians can take china southern or many other airlines. they have plenty of routes serving indian cities :P
 
alternatively indians can take china southern or many other airlines. they have plenty of routes serving indian cities :P

LOL

India can't even get 50 Chinese soldiers who went camping inside India to leave so what makes it possible for India to take Southern Chinese cities ??? LOL
 
Unfortunately Tibet is a buffer between the Chinese mainland and India so India needs an AC to get closer to Beijing , Shanghai etc

India would not and probably cant get the AC close to Beijing and Shanghai. This is not even the purpose. Naval blockade seems more tangible. What good getting close to Beijing and Shanghai do anyway?

Anyways, you do agree that Carriers are for power projection away from mainland?
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom