Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Army chief General Raheel Sharif on Thursday said no military in the world has been able to synergise effects as much as the Pakistan Army has single-handedly.
Addressing the participants at Command and Staff College in Quetta, General Raheel said he is proud of commanding, dynamic and resolute force, Director General Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) Lt-Gen Asim Saleem Bajwa said.
http://tribune.com.pk/story/1110758/army-chief-departs-day-long-visit-quetta/
If you are talking of Conventional warfare then there are MANY Armies
more powerful than Pakistan Army INCLUDING Indian Army
Indian Army's performance in Kargil and Siachen has been BETTER than Pakistan Army
And as far non conventional war is concerned
Indian Army has Never used heavy artillery or Air power while fighting insurgents in Kashmir
and North East
We used IAF Only once in 1966 in the North East state of Manipur
I think you are calculating in direct comparison. what he said is about the skills and achievements. US with all B series bombers, missiles gunships and the most high tech weapons and intelligence, faile to defeat all Taliban infact 50% of Afghanista is practically under Taliban control. they cannot go out from kabul red zone even.
on the other side the whole border area has been cleaned by Pakistan army and there are ground radars and checkposts to stop any possible insurgency.
Armstrong maybe... I think he's on Team Swede myself. But Pakistan didn't side with Norway, it sided with the Americans.
Only you can tell me how someone can find anyone with superior firepower. The "coalition" never overwhelm Soviets.. they were just a nuisance... that is what your military is for superpowers.. a nuisance.. To say they are equal requires a very high degree of narcissism..So let me get this straight, the soviets weren't able to defeat the Afghan and Pakistan coalition because first they weren't able to find them with their sophisticated weapons, superior firepower and technology against a foe on horse back, second they were multiplying within seconds like cockroaches and overwhelmed the Russians with just superior breeding ROFL and this guy is accusing me of being delusional and learn what history your superior breeding one?
If I continue to respond to this buthurt idiotic baniya, his buthurtness might rub off on me lol
We were used as a tool because we allowed ourselves to be used as a tool, we were under the impression that the US were champions of peace and prosperity instead of being nothing more than a war mongering nation which is very clear today but it wasn't at that point in time, siding with the US was the biggest blunder we ever made in history.
Regarding China and the USSR having a "conflict" going on, I'm sure it was nothing compared to the conflict with the west and we still managed to create such a blossoming and brotherly relations with China even though we were in he capitalist corner so I think it wouldn't have made that much of a difference.
If they "could have" then why didn't they? over a decade of war they were made to retreat back to where they came from against a coalition of Pakistan's Army and Afghan Mujahideen, I'm not going to argue with an Indian on this fact, USSR's conventional armed forces were present for over a decade, waged a way and retreated without any gains at all, your could or if theories did not happen.
That same coalition later outwitted and defeated the US led coalition.
Yes it was a big blunder, I agree with you.
What new tech did Genghis Khan posses?
Woo hoo!
A bloated title to an already jingoistic statement.
And who would that be?A Statement to keep the fat, arrogant elephant in the room satisfied.
And who would that be?
We are hearing it from pretty long time now. I don't know they say on what basics?
So what, after 6-7 years, they came back and took control of 70pc of Afghanistan.Actually NATO forces achieved all their military objectives in Afghanistan and Iraq so much so that coward Mullah Omar ran away on a motorbike during the first few days of NATO invasion.
LMAOSoviets did the same thing in Afghanistan, they were more brutal than US and gave 2 fuks about Human rights.They achieved all their military objectives.
If you wanted communist infiltration and Pakistan to become a satellite of USSR then yes.It was us but look how that turned out in the end... I think USSR might have been a far better ally than Baba America...
The object of a guerrilla war is to remain a continuous "nuisance" for the enemy to a point where he is forced to leave your territory. When that objective is achieved, it is considered a victory for the weaker side that has been conducting guerrilla warfare.Only you can tell me how someone can find anyone with superior firepower. The "coalition" never overwhelm Soviets.. they were just a nuisance... that is what your military is for superpowers.. a nuisance.. To say they are equal requires a very high degree of narcissism..
And Soviets were winning inside Afghanistan, right?The Soviet Union took itself out. Its demise was only hastened by outside influences, mainly the US stretching them thin as they competed for influence and dominance.