What's new

National Air Defense Command (NADCOM) - Updates & Discussions.

Because (as per some sources here on PDF) we are about to sign a deal to acquire LY80E. So, if it's true, then it is justified to become part of this thread.

Why all of sudden you started posting in 4 years old thread?
 
Because (as per some sources here on PDF) we are about to sign a deal to acquire LY80E. So, if it's true, then it is justified to become part of this thread.

For me all alpha numeric codes are same. But anyway if it gives some heartburn to my beloved friends than good news :pop:
 
Wao. I can't believe I. Shukkar hey Allah ka if it's true.
 
57mm aa guns against rafale su30 and mirage2000.
Your kidding right.

Su30 will carry supersonic brahmos cruise missle range 300km five times speed of sound.
Rafale will carry 500km stealth attack storm shadow or scalp cruise missiles.
And you want aa guns

The guns aren't against the SU's or the Rafale's. These are Close in Weapon Systems.....similar to the ship defense systems. Believe it or not, these are EXTREMELY effective against cruise and other missiles, stand off munitions, low flying objects and UAV's.
If you think India will take a chance to put 200 of their SU's or the Rafale's at risk, you are crazy.

Losing 50 SU 30's and say 20 Rafale's would have tremendous effect on the reputation, moral and the $$. Majority of these things will happen from stand off distances.

There is a reason as to why the PAF is looking into acquiring multiple short / medium range SAM systems in large numbers and more than likely, they'll soon build one too. The main threat is not from the SU-30'2 or Rafal's or the Jags, its from the munition they would fire and the amount of munitions being fired.

When India can have 100 jets at any time firing weapons towards Pakistan from 20 Miles inside the Indian territory, its as dangerous as if these jets are inside Pakistani airspace (but with much more risk of course).

So if you can destroy munitions before hitting their targets, you've essentially countered the SU-30 and Rafale. If 70% or 80% of the munition don't hit the target....what's left?

The next step is to do aerial bombardment and that would result in losing a big number of SU's and Rafale's....I don't think a power projecting country like India wants to show the world "we destroyed 120 Pakistani jets, but we lost 60 SU-30's and 20 Rafale's in a five day war".

What are you allowing the world to see in this case? That JFT is perhaps better than or equal to the SU-30's or Rafale's? or that F-16's, even block 15 ones, destroyed a few SU's or Rafales in dog fight.....so imagine if Pakistan had 1:1 parity....these "junior" platforms would've produced numbers from the above statement to ....pretty much the same on both sides? That's power humiliation, not power projection.

However, both the nations should work like the European Union and help the humanity in the region. Its the most populous region yet most poor too. Between India, Pakistan, China and Russia.....trillions of trade is possible BY ROAD. Why do you want to be enemies when so much more can be achieved for all humans living there if you can create some peace??

Pakistan has bought LY-80 LOMADS SAM.

The document says 3 units were purchased. Does one unit come with 6 missiles on a TEL / VLT? So it'd be 18 missiles total? That's very little.....can someone explain a bit more please on the quantity?
 
Last edited:
A little confusion. HQ-16 is used by PLA but not PLAAF, why PAF bought it but not the army?
 
3 units, 225 million USD. looks like three batteries.



The guns aren't against the SU's or the Rafale's. These are Close in Weapon Systems.....similar to the ship defense systems. Believe it or not, these are EXTREMELY effective against cruise and other missiles, stand off munitions, low flying objects and UAV's.
If you think India will take a chance to put 200 of their SU's or the Rafale's at risk, you are crazy.

Losing 50 SU 30's and say 20 Rafale's would have tremendous effect on the reputation, moral and the $$. Majority of these things will happen from stand off distances.

There is a reason as to why the PAF is looking into acquiring multiple short / medium range SAM systems in large numbers and more than likely, they'll soon build one too. The main threat is not from the SU-30'2 or Rafal's or the Jags, its from the munition they would fire and the amount of munitions being fired.

When India can have 100 jets at any time firing weapons towards Pakistan from 20 Miles inside the Indian territory, its as dangerous as if these jets are inside Pakistani airspace (but with much more risk of course).

So if you can destroy munitions before hitting their targets, you've essentially countered the SU-30 and Rafale. If 70% or 80% of the munition don't hit the target....what's left?

The next step is to do aerial bombardment and that would result in losing a big number of SU's and Rafale's....I don't think a power projecting country like India wants to show the world "we destroyed 120 Pakistani jets, but we lost 60 SU-30's and 20 Rafale's in a five day war".

What are you allowing the world to see in this case? That JFT is perhaps better than or equal to the SU-30's or Rafale's? or that F-16's, even block 15 ones, destroyed a few SU's or Rafales in dog fight.....so imagine if Pakistan had 1:1 parity....these "junior" platforms would've produced numbers from the above statement to ....pretty much the same on both sides? That's power humiliation, not power projection.

However, both the nations should work like the European Union and help the humanity in the region. Its the most populous region yet most poor too. Between India, Pakistan, China and Russia.....trillions of trade is possible BY ROAD. Why do you want to be enemies when so much more can be achieved for all humans living there if you can create some peace??



The document says 3 units were purchased. Does one unit come with 6 missiles on a TEL / VLT? So it'd be 18 missiles total? That's very little.....can someone explain a bit more please on the quantity?
 
LY-80

Battery configuration with ibis-150 target search radar The S-band radar has a range of 140 km and can detect targets flying at an altitude of 20 km.

and 3 target tracking radar

A single radar guidance vehicle controls two to four launcher units with six missiles ready to launch.

The tracking and guidance radar vehicle performs target acquisition and tracking, and identification of target types. It also controls the missile launching and illuminates the target after the missile is fired. L-band passive phased-array radar is mounted at the rear of the vehicle and has a range of 85 km. The L-band radar can detect up to six targets and track four of them, and provide fire-control/guidance for up to eight missiles.


HQ-16A LY-80 ground to air defence missile system technical data sheet specifications pictures video - Army Recognition - Army Recognition

Same radar ibis 150 is employed with sky dragon 50 and a newer version ibis 200 is now available, IBIS 200 radar has a range of 250 km when in early warning mode - substantially further than the IBIS-150's 130 km range - and 150 km in target designation mode.

SAM Sky Dragon 50

15557610869_cd29cc68fb_b.jpg
 
its good to hav it bt Army should also think about its capabilities with a new change in weaponinstead of that old G-3A3
 
LY-80 E MRSAM is a fantastic weapon. Congrats PAF. Btw, PAF is the second customer, BAF was the first to receive this 4th generation of SAM which is more accurate than the 3rd generation of LY80

1828193.jpg
 
Per OEM IBIS 150 is a target designation radar
So now I am confused, 8 bought along with 3 missile battery

Radar and Electro-Optic Equipment--北方工业

Malaysia is going to buy LY-80E (Export) as well as manufacture it locally

Egypt is buying S300/400, 6 battalions for $3 Billion, so its .5 Billion for a battalion, $225 Million for a battalion of 3 batteries or systems which can be deployed independently at 1/2 the price of S300/400

1 Battery ISBD/KHUTA/Taxila/Kamra complex (Covering the whole area)
1 Battery Sargodha Complex
1 Battery Karachi complex

I assume there will be follow on at least 2-3 more, another battalion

Again these are area defense weapons so is SPADA 2000, low/medium/high altitude (15-15000 meters)
Crotale, Mistral etc. are point defense systems, low level under 10-15 k feet altitude
 
Things are bit out of control , too many systems being mentioned with out a deal going thru

We are hearing almost 3 systems from Russia
We are hearing these 1-2 Systems from China

However we have not signed or received an item , and backed that claim up with solid source

Also worth consideration is with the advancement in Stealth platform or 5th generation being accessible to most armies of world, is it wise to still pump in 1-2 Billion dollars into these systems when World Air-forces will start inducting 5th generation Jets in 10 years time

If anything , the system should be purchased now so we can use them for at least 10-14 years max and the cost should cover the fact stealth planes are present in air
 
Have we already bought it? If yes then how many?
 
Kh-31p used by india can hit a radar at a range of 110 km.... LY80 missile range is 40-50 km.... i dont see any justification for low medium SAMs unless under cover of longer range SAMs like S-300 pmu2 etc.
 
Back
Top Bottom