National Air Defense Command (NADCOM) - Updates & Discussions.

[SQ8]

We killed 2 frost giants already

You'll be dealing with dragons soon. In either case, focus with posts and quality or thou shall face my wrath.

 

[Donatello]

I implied nothing except for the satisfaction that we have a similar system??
Whats the reason for ur fury here??

The reason is that no one gives a shyt about what you have in this topic.

 

[he-man]

The reason is that no one gives a shyt about what you have in this topic.

U did give a shyte sir.
Plus i was feeling happy for pakistanis as we have a similar system so no need for us to match u guys there.No need to make it a big issue sire

 

[Donatello]

U did give a shyte sir.
Plus i was feeling happy for pakistanis as we have a similar system so no need for us to match u guys there.No need to make it a big issue sire

OFF Topic posts by trolls is a serious issue.

 

[Derolo]

Specs are 15km altitude and 40km range

So MR-SAM or LR-SAM?

Also these can or cannot be fitted into F-22P?

 

[ali_raza]

where the money coming from?mbt 3000,cutters,mi35,fc31!!!

 

[MastanKhan]

wise thinking as long range sams have proved less effective then short or medium range systems

Hi,

The current versions of LR sams are indeed extremely deadly.

 

[SQ8]

Specs are 15km altitude and 40km range

So MR-SAM or LR-SAM?

Also these can or cannot be fitted into F-22P?

MR-SAM.. along the same lines(because it is a purchased/reverse engineered/modified) Buk Missile that forms the basis for the HQ-16.

While this version is canisterized and may have naval potential, so far there is no inkling of a naval version. Again, its possible that somewhere in Zhuhai there are models or brochures that outline Naval version of various Chinese SAM systems but as we dont know.. well.. we dont know.

 

[Donatello]

MR-SAM.. along the same lines(because it is a purchased/reverse engineered/modified) Buk Missile that forms the basis for the HQ-16.

While this version is canisterized and may have naval potential, so far there is no inkling of a naval version. Again, its possible that somewhere in Zhuhai there are models or brochures that outline Naval version of various Chinese SAM systems but as we dont know.. well.. we dont know.

It is fine to have short to medium range coverage, but didn't spada provide that pretty well? 40km is more like short range not medium, considering long range is 100km+ S200/300/400 etc

 

[SQ8]

It is fine to have short to medium range coverage, but didn't spada provide that pretty well? 40km is more like short range not medium, considering long range is 100km+ S200/300/400 etc

While the Spada is a slightly better system in certain respects to this system so this basically covers up the bases and areas left by the inability to afford more SPADA batteries.

 

[Imran Khan]

Well we will have barak-8,,so its all fine

bachy bara ho ga every thread same BS is not good

 

[fatman17]

Good news, can complement Spada.

Is it true that spada has been renamed anza III?

 

[Donatello]

Is it true that spada has been renamed anza III?

Hah, god forbid no....

 

[ali_raza]

Hi,

The current versions of LR sams are indeed extremely deadly.

thanks fir reply sir.but isnt it a fact that even bvr,s cant be trusted with there full range.!!

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

No source just speculation